UNI88 wrote:

dbackjon wrote:BTW - you're grandparents/parents and everyone else that fought in WWII were antifa as well

So an = anarchists and fa = fascists. What does the ti in the middle equal?

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

ANTI-FAscists

BTW - you're grandparents/parents and everyone else that fought in WWII were antifa as well

AZGrizFan wrote:

dbackjon wrote:Typical Republican

Says the fan of the party that owns Antifa.

They are anarchists, who wouldn't be caught dead voting for a Democrat.

Unlike the GOP, that embraces and elects the right-wing fanatics

Typical Republican

Not if you made them cumulative. Both the cases you cited dealt with districts of unequal population. Example - Arizona has 9 seats. In cumulative voting a voter would get 9 votes. They could cast for 9 different candidates, or 3 each to 3, etc. A third party could run one candidate, have it's memb...

Are you talking about states with only one representative? No. Every one of the 435 Congressional districts is single-member. Not if you made them cumulative. Both the cases you cited dealt with districts of unequal population. Example - Arizona has 9 seats. In cumulative voting a voter would get 9...

There is the Amendment process. And cite where you think it is unconstitutional It doesn’t work at the federal level with single-member districts, which we have had by statute in federal elections since the mid-60s. Trying to implement cumulative voting in single-member districts, even if mathemati...

Ivytalk wrote:

dbackjon wrote:

Do you know what I mean by cumulative voting?

What part of a Parliamentary government do you not like?

It’s unconstitutional in federal elections, but other than that...

There is the Amendment process.


And cite where you think it is unconstitutional

Do you know what I mean by cumulative voting? What part of a Parliamentary government do you not like? I don't like narrow-minded, single-issue political groups. For all of their warts, I prefer the bigger umbrella political parties that bring those groups together. Or do you actually like politica...

CID1990 wrote:

mainejeff wrote:
American don’t even believe their own eyes now....they certainly aren’t going to believe what they read in books.

Well Jeff, I think you and I have some common ground here.

Hug?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can I get one as well?

93henfan wrote:Don't rest on your yannies.

**laurels

Cumulative voting would actually give a third or fourth party a better shot at winning seats in the House. Sure, but in some cases it would be someone's second or third choice, which doesn't really mean they'd want those candidates either. I've seen Parliamentary governments, I really wouldn't want...

Cumulative voting would actually give a third or fourth party a better shot at winning seats in the House.

Then support ranked choice or cumulative voting I'd be fine with ranked choice in primaries, but I don't think it would make any difference in the actual Presidential election. Besides, it ends up giving the eventual winner even more of a mandate (the "see, I had more than 50% of the vote, peo...

It's not like it's close guys. It's been 26 years since Ross Perot got almost 19% of the vote. Nothing has been close since. Last year all the third party together didn't crack 6%. Now, IF a Republican runs as an independent this year, I would expect a better than average year, but don't look for a...

You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year? And voting your conscience is only if they vote ho...

Three of them are Congresspeople from Arizona, one from Texas. But then again, FoxNews fixates on AOC, and doesn't show the racist and idiotic crap the GOP does, so you wouldn't know :nod: :kisswink: I don't watch Fox news. In fact, i don't watch any news . :kisswink: That explains quite a bit, act...

The "Freedom Caucus" is the worst part of Congress, bar none - full of White Supremacists like Andy Biggs, Louis Gohmert, Paul Gosar, Matt Gaetz, Debbie Lesko, etc. The majority have the intellectual brain power of a two year old, and each make statements far dumber and anti-American than...

The "Freedom Caucus" is the worst part of Congress, bar none - full of White Supremacists like Andy Biggs, Louis Gohmert, Paul Gosar, Matt Gaetz, Debbie Lesko, etc. The majority have the intellectual brain power of a two year old, and each make statements far dumber and anti-American than...

So who do you think is a good option? If you could convince 5 people to throw their names in the Dem Primary (because Trump has the GOP nomination locked down), who would you convince? Tulsi Gabbard, the young female Bernie Sanders. http://d2ioe7v385j9xr.cloudfront.net/608_1b3e2628-2b7d-4de0-a42e-d...

It is the same reason that Bernie runs as a Democrat instead of for one of the socialist parties - there’s more campaign money and assistance to be had I’d like to see the Freedom Caucus guys like Amash, Paul and the others come out with Ls by their names but I think political realities in their di...

bluehenbillk wrote:It's bad when there are no good options....again

So who do you think is a good option?

If you could convince 5 people to throw their names in the Dem Primary (because Trump has the GOP nomination locked down), who would you convince?

I read that - very interesting.

Great point about how we spend trillions on wars, China spends it on infrastructure

So LeBron is doing well in the playoffs this year?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Now Z worships at the feet of the morally bankrupt Trump, hands out MAGA hats for Christmas, and prays to Dear Leader Donald every night. You really don't know me, do you? :dunce: :dunce: :dunce: Better than you realize :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :nod: :...