How does any of those three choices make it any different than the previous election cycles?89Hen wrote:Good oped here...
http://ariarmstrong.com/2016/06/should- ... president/
Arguably, this year Johnson is bigger than the Libertarian Party such that he largely escapes its problems. I think a liberty advocate can reasonably argue, “I’m voting for Johnson because of his record and policy positions, not because he’s a Libertarian, and voting for him this year as a protest will send a strong message to the Republican Party that it needs to shape up—or be replaced by a viable liberty party.”
But I think voting for Clinton, voting for another minor-party or independent candidate, or not voting in the presidential race would send a similar message.
The key is for people who cast a protest vote, whatever its form, to clearly and publicly articulate why they are casting a protest vote. It is the public articulation, not the vote itself, that is most important in terms of influencing the future direction of American politics.
I get it, a hell of a lot of "small l" Libertarians would rather bitch and moan about the state of the country while keeping their hands clean with "well, it's not MY fault that things are this way."

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk