FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
Aho Old Guy
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
I am a fan of: Tweetsee
A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie

FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by Aho Old Guy »

:shock:
Comey misstated key Clinton email evidence at Monday hearing
...
“Somehow, her emails were being forwarded to Anthony Weiner, including classified information,’’ Comey said, adding later, “His then-spouse Huma Abedin appears to have had a regular practice of forwarding emails to him for him I think to print out for her so she could then deliver them to the secretary of state.”

At another point in the testimony, Comey said Abedin “forwarded hundreds and thousands of e-mails, some of which contain classified information.’’

Neither of those statements are accurate
, according to people close to the investigation. The investigation found that Abedin did occasionally forward emails to her husband for printing, but it was a far smaller number than described by Comey, and it wasn’t a “regular practice,’’ these people said. None of the forwarded emails were marked classified but a small number - a handful, one person said - contained information that was later judged to contain classified information, these people said.

Justice Department and FBI officials are now considering whether and how to clarify the misstatements ...
My guess is the Director was too busy investigating Russian efforts to influence the 2016 Presidential election (yeah ... that must be it) and any of those FAKE connections to our Dear Leader to be bothered with such Clinton nonsense.

The FBI is the GREATEST! We must respect their authority ...
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by Ibanez »

Aho Old Guy wrote::shock:
Comey misstated key Clinton email evidence at Monday hearing
...
“Somehow, her emails were being forwarded to Anthony Weiner, including classified information,’’ Comey said, adding later, “His then-spouse Huma Abedin appears to have had a regular practice of forwarding emails to him for him I think to print out for her so she could then deliver them to the secretary of state.”

At another point in the testimony, Comey said Abedin “forwarded hundreds and thousands of e-mails, some of which contain classified information.’’

Neither of those statements are accurate
, according to people close to the investigation. The investigation found that Abedin did occasionally forward emails to her husband for printing, but it was a far smaller number than described by Comey, and it wasn’t a “regular practice,’’ these people said. None of the forwarded emails were marked classified but a small number - a handful, one person said - contained information that was later judged to contain classified information, these people said.

Justice Department and FBI officials are now considering whether and how to clarify the misstatements ...
My guess is the Director was too busy investigating Russian efforts to influence the 2016 Presidential election (yeah ... that must be it) and any of those FAKE connections to our Dear Leader to be bothered with such Clinton nonsense.

The FBI is the GREATEST! We must respect their authority ...
Doesn't matter. When you receive a security clearance, and work in the gov't you sign documents, NDAs, etc.. that all say you understand that information is need to know. Furthermore, you are expected to recognize that information, classified properly or not, may be confidential. If you can't get the little things right...how can we expect you to get the big things right?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by CID1990 »

Let's review

None of this happens if Clinton uses a .gov account like the rest of us


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by houndawg »

CID1990 wrote:Let's review

None of this happens if Clinton uses a .gov account like the rest of us


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She should have stuck to Twitter
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by CID1990 »

houndawg wrote:
CID1990 wrote:Let's review

None of this happens if Clinton uses a .gov account like the rest of us


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She should have stuck to Twitter
That would be better than hiding from public oversight.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
Aho Old Guy
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:18 pm
I am a fan of: Tweetsee
A.K.A.: Evil & Nastie

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by Aho Old Guy »

CID1990 wrote:
houndawg wrote:

She should have stuck to Twitter
That would be better than hiding from public oversight.
YES!
That Chicken Hillary could never withstand an 11 hour grilling from a disingenuous opposition whose intent was simply to "drive down poll numbers"
CID1990 wrote:Let's review

None of this happens if Clinton uses a .gov account like the rest of us
YES! (again)
Cankles next scheme was to utilize a national party server for tens of millions of 'FOIA' emails while 'accidentally' losing millions along the way ...



Sent from Planet Claire using a Vulcan Mind Meld via a 56k modem and electric shock therapy
"But the damned and the guiltiest among you are the men who had the capacity to know, yet chose to blank out reality, the men who were willing to sell their intelligence into cynical servitude..."
- John Galt
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by CID1990 »

Aho Old Guy wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
That would be better than hiding from public oversight.
YES!
That Chicken Hillary could never withstand an 11 hour grilling from a disingenuous opposition whose intent was simply to "drive down poll numbers"
CID1990 wrote:Let's review

None of this happens if Clinton uses a .gov account like the rest of us
YES! (again)
Cankles next scheme was to utilize a national party server for tens of millions of 'FOIA' emails while 'accidentally' losing millions along the way ...



Sent from Planet Claire using a Vulcan Mind Meld via a 56k modem and electric shock therapy
The Benghazi hearings drove down her numbers for this reason alone:

Image

I LOVE that photo. When she smirked and tried her best to look like she had better things to do I thought to myself that she was going to have serious issues in the election.

If it was solely the intention of the GOP to drive down her numbers, she played right into their hands. It's like she was trying to help them
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by JohnStOnge »

I don't think the Benghazi hearings hurt Clinton all that much. In fact I think those hearings may have hurt the Republicans as well because I think they were perceived by a lot of people as going on yet another witch hunt. I remember looking at public opinion polling while all that was going on and Clinton was still getting high ratings in terms of being trustworthy. At the time I was incredulous.

I think what killed her was that private e mail server thing that led to FBI investigation. We can never know but I will always think that if she'd never made the decision to use that private server and just used .gov e mail she'd be President right now and it would not have been close if it'd come down to her or Trump.

I think Benghazi fired up people who, for the most part, were never going to vote for her anyway. I think the private server thing did actually cost her a substantial number of votes.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69070
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by kalm »

She lost because she was arrogant, preachy, fake, humorless, and generally unlikeable. Far more than Benghazi or emails.
Image
Image
Image
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by Ibanez »

kalm wrote:She lost because she was arrogant, preachy, fake, humorless, and generally unlikeable. Far more than Benghazi or emails.
:thumb:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
cx500d
Level1
Level1
Posts: 155
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:50 pm
I am a fan of: NDSU
Location: DC

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by cx500d »

kalm wrote:She lost because she was arrogant, preachy, fake, humorless, and generally unlikeable. Far more than Benghazi or emails.
"Was"?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by GannonFan »

kalm wrote:She lost because she was arrogant, preachy, fake, humorless, and generally unlikeable. Far more than Benghazi or emails.
I agree, people trying to peg this to one thing or another miss the bigger picture - the electorate in enough places to matter in the electoral vote (i.e. the way we elect Presidents) were pissed off at the status quo and the same old politicians who delivered the status quo and Hillary was the quintessential status quo candidate. It's really that simple.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: FBI Director's 'Pants On Fire' ?

Post by houndawg »

JohnStOnge wrote:I don't think the Benghazi hearings hurt Clinton all that much. In fact I think those hearings may have hurt the Republicans as well because I think they were perceived by a lot of people as going on yet another witch hunt. I remember looking at public opinion polling while all that was going on and Clinton was still getting high ratings in terms of being trustworthy. At the time I was incredulous.

I think what killed her was that private e mail server thing that led to FBI investigation. We can never know but I will always think that if she'd never made the decision to use that private server and just used .gov e mail she'd be President right now and it would not have been close if it'd come down to her or Trump.

I think Benghazi fired up people who, for the most part, were never going to vote for her anyway. I think the private server thing did actually cost her a substantial number of votes.
Its hurting them now - they have a harder time playing the witch hunt card without causing convulsions of laughter nationwide after their histrionics over Benghazi. Bunch of pussy snowflakes. :coffee:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
Post Reply