89Hen wrote:CID1990 wrote:Sperry's right
No one cares

89Hen wrote:CID1990 wrote:Sperry's right
No one cares
WE used to stand in the ring while people threw them. The object of the "game" was to time your jump so the jart didn't impale your feet. But you had to land back in the ring to get a point. If you landed out of the ring (and jart landed in) the thrower got the point.....now that I'm reading what I just typed, it explains so many of the other poor choices of my youth....89Hen wrote:They were awesome.dbackjon wrote:
We had Jarts - and they are illegal to sell, even person to person.We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.
Holy SHIT! It's like old home week around here! First DuckDuckGriz shows his mug, and now THIS yokel...Appaholic wrote:WE used to stand in the ring while people threw them. The object of the "game" was to time your jump so the jart didn't impale your feet. But you had to land back in the ring to get a point. If you landed out of the ring (and jart landed in) the thrower got the point.....now that I'm reading what I just typed, it explains so many of the other poor choices of my youth....89Hen wrote: They were awesome.We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.
I figured you must have lost.Appaholic wrote:WE used to stand in the ring while people threw them. The object of the "game" was to time your jump so the jart didn't impale your feet. But you had to land back in the ring to get a point. If you landed out of the ring (and jart landed in) the thrower got the point.....now that I'm reading what I just typed, it explains so many of the other poor choices of my youth....89Hen wrote: They were awesome.We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.
Holy sh1t it’s crappaholicAppaholic wrote:WE used to stand in the ring while people threw them. The object of the "game" was to time your jump so the jart didn't impale your feet. But you had to land back in the ring to get a point. If you landed out of the ring (and jart landed in) the thrower got the point.....now that I'm reading what I just typed, it explains so many of the other poor choices of my youth....89Hen wrote: They were awesome.We thought nothing about standing next to the ring while the other two people threw them back.
Not by much....89Hen wrote:I figured you must have lost.Appaholic wrote:
WE used to stand in the ring while people threw them. The object of the "game" was to time your jump so the jart didn't impale your feet. But you had to land back in the ring to get a point. If you landed out of the ring (and jart landed in) the thrower got the point.....now that I'm reading what I just typed, it explains so many of the other poor choices of my youth....
Wasn't there a recent court case (Texas?) that allowed the distribution of the source code to print firearms?Baldy wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
I hate not getting things. What is this?Skjellyfetti wrote:
I was wondering the same thing89Hen wrote:I hate not getting things. What is this?Skjellyfetti wrote:
I believe it's Jelly's lame attempt to make fun of Trump supporters holding Q anon signs.89Hen wrote:I hate not getting things. What is this?Skjellyfetti wrote:
So they’re tin-hat conspiracy theorists, writ large. Amirite?dbackjon wrote:Anyone holding a Q Anon SHOULD Be made fun of
Yes. Mueller is supposed to be working for Trump because Trump has his ass over a barrel and they are going to drain the swamp so much, that you will need to use FEMA camps as their prison.Ivytalk wrote:So they’re tin-hat conspiracy theorists, writ large. Amirite?dbackjon wrote:Anyone holding a Q Anon SHOULD Be made fun of