Will she or won’t she? POLL

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:28 am

Chizzang wrote:
Pwns wrote:If we end up with Clinton versus Trump again then we can call Democracy a failed experiment. Or at least the schit process of choosing nominees in the major parties.
if we end up with Trump and Clinton as our two choices
I will be officially dropping out of American politics

Nobody will miss me obviously - but I will no longer vote
and I will begin the process of divorcing myself from our political system

I am not kidding
at that point nothing matters politically (obviously its all a charade)

It was Game Over with Citizens United. They're just mopping up now.

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 6:27 am

Clinton isn’t going to run. She’s in the middle of a book tour. Adding this element that she may run is good for appearances, articles and keeps her name in the news so she can sell a book.

Many people may be saying she should run.

But I bet many more are telling her to put the pantsuits and mumus away and stay home.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:13 am

Ibanez wrote:Clinton isn’t going to run. She’s in the middle of a book tour. Adding this element that she may run is good for appearances, articles and keeps her name in the news so she can sell a book.

Many people may be saying she should run.

But I bet many more are telling her to put the pantsuits and mumus away and stay home.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Somebody should keep an org chart of all the reasons she claims she lost the election

There are at least 50 reasons

None of them named Hillary Clinton

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:37 am

CID1990 wrote:
Ibanez wrote:Clinton isn’t going to run. She’s in the middle of a book tour. Adding this element that she may run is good for appearances, articles and keeps her name in the news so she can sell a book.

Many people may be saying she should run.

But I bet many more are telling her to put the pantsuits and mumus away and stay home.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Somebody should keep an org chart of all the reasons she claims she lost the election

There are at least 50 reasons

None of them named Hillary Clinton

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm sure "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" is at the top.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:03 pm

Ibanez wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Somebody should keep an org chart of all the reasons she claims she lost the election

There are at least 50 reasons

None of them named Hillary Clinton

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm sure "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" is at the top.

Last week it was misogyny

Before that it was Russians

Vast right wing conspiracies are so 1990s

BTW I read in an article that in her book about important strong women she completely omits Maggie Thatcher. When questioned about it she basically gave the party line pablum about feels and stuff

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:00 pm

CID1990 wrote:
Ibanez wrote: I'm sure "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" is at the top.
Last week it was misogyny

Before that it was Russians

Vast right wing conspiracies are so 1990s

BTW I read in an article that in her book about important strong women she completely omits Maggie Thatcher. When questioned about it she basically gave the party line pablum about feels and stuff

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your obsession with Hilary is duly noted
You seem to know a lot about her details

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 5:16 pm

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Last week it was misogyny

Before that it was Russians

Vast right wing conspiracies are so 1990s

BTW I read in an article that in her book about important strong women she completely omits Maggie Thatcher. When questioned about it she basically gave the party line pablum about feels and stuff

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your obsession with Hilary is duly noted
You seem to know a lot about her details

She’s been in my life since 1992 and she won’t go away

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pwns · Post by **Pwns** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 8:06 pm

Chizzang wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
Last week it was misogyny

Before that it was Russians

Vast right wing conspiracies are so 1990s

BTW I read in an article that in her book about important strong women she completely omits Maggie Thatcher. When questioned about it she basically gave the party line pablum about feels and stuff

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Your obsession with Hilary is duly noted
You seem to know a lot about her details

People keep talking about her because she won't shut up and go away.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:31 pm

Pwns wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Your obsession with Hilary is duly noted
You seem to know a lot about her details

People keep talking about her because she won't shut up and go away.

oh I see...
so that's all that's required to stay in the forefront of Republican thought for years on end

sincerely,
greta thunberg

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Fri Nov 15, 2019 12:47 am

What started out as an observation that Hillary is in denial about why she lost

in a thread about whether she will run again or not

Reliably triggers Clotz into yet another “obsessed with Hillary” post

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Pwns · Post by **Pwns** » Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:14 am

Chizzang wrote:
Pwns wrote:
People keep talking about her because she won't shut up and go away.
oh I see...
so that's all that's required to stay in the forefront of Republican thought for years on end

sincerely,
greta thunberg

She greased the skids for Donald Trump to win the presidency. 2016 and her role in it will be talked about for a long time, and not just by Republicans. Get used to it.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:23 am

Pwns wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
oh I see...
so that's all that's required to stay in the forefront of Republican thought for years on end

sincerely,
greta thunberg
She greased the skids for Donald Trump to win the presidency. 2016 and her role in it will be talked about for a long time, and not just by Republicans. Get used to it.

Pwne I think you may have hit on why Clerdz’s radar is so tuned to people talking about her

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

css75 · Post by **css75** » Fri Nov 15, 2019 6:38 pm

CID1990 wrote:What started out as an observation that Hillary is in denial about why she lost

in a thread about whether she will run again or not

Reliably triggers Clotz into yet another “obsessed with Hillary” post

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My guess is because he is a huge fan of hers.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:58 am

Pwns wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
oh I see...
so that's all that's required to stay in the forefront of Republican thought for years on end

sincerely,
greta thunberg
She greased the skids for Donald Trump to win the presidency. 2016 and her role in it will be talked about for a long time, and not just by Republicans. Get used to it.

I warned them years ago but they wouldn't listen.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Will she or won’t she? POLL

Will Hillary Clinton Run for POTUS in 2020?

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL

Re: Will she or won’t she? POLL