BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:47 pm 50 wins in 50 days. So much winning..
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/202 ... americans/





BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:47 pm 50 wins in 50 days. So much winning..
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/202 ... americans/
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
We all noticed you didn't even bother to list any of the accomplishments as incorrect.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 6:41 pmBDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 4:47 pm 50 wins in 50 days. So much winning..
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/202 ... americans/![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I’m more into non-fiction these days, but I hear it was swell.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 7:02 pmWe all noticed you didn't even bother to list any of the accomplishments as incorrect.
You didn't even read them, did you lazy ass? Just to let you know, the role of lazy ass poster has been filled by Uni St Behar for years. Stop mooching on his job bitch. Find yer own
I'll still always remember, though, that while you are certainly distant from so many of Trump's policies, the startling intersection of kalm's economic plan and Trump's economic plan, that is, trying to bully other countries (and tariffs constitute that) to tilt the balance of trade with the US strongly in the US's favor, is just as startling now as it was when you first voiced it.
Or, he doesn't and he's an idiot. Plenty of evidence for the idiot side of the argument.
Yeah and you’re not portraying my previous arguments fairly either.GannonFan wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 9:22 amI'll still always remember, though, that while you are certainly distant from so many of Trump's policies, the startling intersection of kalm's economic plan and Trump's economic plan, that is, trying to bully other countries (and tariffs constitute that) to tilt the balance of trade with the US strongly in the US's favor, is just as startling now as it was when you first voiced it.
UNI88 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 3:05 pm I know trump wants to blame any and all price increases on biden but he's the one who said “when I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One” so he owns the price of eggs, gas, etc. despite his lame attempts to pass the buck. We need to see the impact of any tariffs too.
Are you going to try and argue that veterans aren't getting fired?
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
And Ft Benning being changed back to Ft Benning.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:35 pmhttps://thehill.com/policy/defense/5137 ... gseth/amp/Pentagon changes Fort Liberty’s name back to Fort Bragg
The Pentagon will change the name of the North Carolina military base Fort Liberty back to Fort Bragg, fulfilling a campaign pledge by President Trump while honoring a different eponym.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Monday signed an order to restore the name of the sprawling Army base to Fort Bragg after it was renamed Fort Liberty in June 2023 as part of a congressionally mandated rule to rename installations honoring Confederate generals.
Hegseth, who signed the memorandum renaming the base while flying to Stuttgart, Germany, said the new moniker pays tribute to Roland L. Bragg, an Army paratrooper who was awarded a Silver Star for actions during the Battle of the Bulge in World War II.
“That’s right. Bragg is back,” Hegseth said after signing the memo in a video posted to the social platform X.
Pentagon press secretary John Ullyot said in a statement the change “underscores the installation’s legacy of recognizing those who have demonstrated extraordinary service and sacrifice for the nation….”
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
He’s agreed to meet. That’s how these things work.
Well, UNI88 thinks Stephen A Smith is a moron.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Stephen A is often interesting and frequently wrong.
1st 2 months Trump is doing what he campaigned on doing.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 1:43 pmStephen A is often interesting and frequently wrong.
If he's correct here then the same argument applies to biden having a mandate in 2020 (not for carrying the battleground states but for the historic number of votes). If people voted for everything trump is doing in 2025+ then people also voted for everything biden did from 2021 - 2024.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Who does trump blame if doge blows up in his face?Cutting government budgets is broadly popular in theory, but if Trump and Musk overcome legal challenges and succeed in large-scale downsizing, they will find that cutting government can backfire on them. By using an axe instead of a scalpel, they run the risk of throwing out the baby with the bathwater and eliminating essential functions. In its haste, DOGE is likely to disrupt services the public supports, making the government less effective. History shows that major government failures are politically lethal, often more so than constitutional arguments. When both occur, they can create serious political problems for the president and the party in power.
...
If Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency plans survive legal challenges, several major failures could follow—each landing squarely on the president’s shoulders. As President Harry Truman famously said, “The buck stops here.”
...
- Disruptions in distribution of Social Security and veterans’ benefits
- Potential delays in tax refund processing
- Increased tax evasion leading to reduced federal revenue ... with fewer staff, the risk of being audited decreases while the incentive to underreport increases. That’s not a sustainable way to reduce the deficit.
- Increased risk of mortality from foodborne illnesses
- Further strain on an already fragile agricultural economy could exacerbate global food insecurity
- Reducing intelligence personnel at the CIA or FBI could increase the risk of domestic terrorist attacks
This list of potential failures extends across nearly every government agency. Musk acknowledges the likelihood of mistakes, saying no one can be perfect, and promises to fix problems quickly. But government operations are not like the tech industry—errors in issuing payments, tracking diseases, or ensuring aviation safety can have serious, sometimes life-threatening consequences. If DOGE indiscriminately slashes budgets and fires essential workers, it risks disaster. The fallout from major failures could hurt Trump’s poll numbers and weaken GOP support.
If your aunt had balls she‘d be your uncle..UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:32 pm It's a month old but relevant ...
How DOGE cutbacks could create a major backlash
Who does trump blame IF doge blows up in his face?Cutting government budgets is broadly popular in theory, but if Trump and Musk overcome legal challenges and succeed in large-scale downsizing, they will find that cutting government can backfire on them. By using an axe instead of a scalpel, they run the risk of throwing out the baby with the bathwater and eliminating essential functions. In its haste, DOGE is likely to disrupt services the public supports, making the government less effective. History shows that major government failures are politically lethal, often more so than constitutional arguments. When both occur, they can create serious political problems for the president and the party in power.
...
If Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency plans survive legal challenges, several major failures could follow—each landing squarely on the president’s shoulders. As President Harry Truman famously said, “The buck stops here.”
...
- Disruptions in distribution of Social Security and veterans’ benefits
- Potential delays in tax refund processing
- Increased tax evasion leading to reduced federal revenue ... with fewer staff, the risk of being audited decreases while the incentive to underreport increases. That’s not a sustainable way to reduce the deficit.
- Increased risk of mortality from foodborne illnesses
- Further strain on an already fragile agricultural economy could exacerbate global food insecurity
- Reducing intelligence personnel at the CIA or FBI could increase the risk of domestic terrorist attacks
This list of potential failures extends across nearly every government agency. Musk acknowledges the likelihood of mistakes, saying no one can be perfect, and promises to fix problems quickly. But government operations are not like the tech industry—errors in issuing payments, tracking diseases, or ensuring aviation safety can have serious, sometimes life-threatening consequences. If DOGE indiscriminately slashes budgets and fires essential workers, it risks disaster. The fallout from major failures could hurt Trump’s poll numbers and weaken GOP support.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Or you could just admit that you have nothing to refute the risks outlined in the article instead of trying to distract/deflect attention away with gratuitous mentions of your relatives.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 7:12 pmIf my aunt had balls she‘d be my uncle.UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 11, 2025 6:32 pm It's a month old but relevant ...
How DOGE cutbacks could create a major backlash
Who does trump blame IF doge blows up in his face?