2025 SCOTUS Decisions
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 31863
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
2025 SCOTUS Decisions
Tik Tok ban upheld. Doesn’t fall across the usual ideological lines, as have bipartisan conks and donks for the ban, and bipartisan conks and donks against it.
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 24681
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico
Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions
Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
on karoline leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
And“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
...
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim majority, the power to impeach a judge with a simple majority vote. But, like a presidential impeachment, any removal requires a vote from a two-thirds majority from the Senate.
...
“What we are seeing is an attempt by one branch of government to intimidate another branch from performing its constitutional duty. It is a direct threat to judicial independence,” Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who specializes in the federal courts, said in an email.
Only one day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.”

Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 31863
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions
So how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
And“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
...
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim majority, the power to impeach a judge with a simple majority vote. But, like a presidential impeachment, any removal requires a vote from a two-thirds majority from the Senate.
...
“What we are seeing is an attempt by one branch of government to intimidate another branch from performing its constitutional duty. It is a direct threat to judicial independence,” Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who specializes in the federal courts, said in an email.
Only one day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.”on karoline leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 24681
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico
Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions
What case? This was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 4:33 pmSo how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?UNI88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
Andon carolyn leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
- BDKJMU
- Level5
- Posts: 31863
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
- I am a fan of: JMU
- A.K.A.: BDKJMU
- Location: Philly Burbs
Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions
This is the ‘2025 SCOTUS Decisions’ thread.
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..

JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 24681
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico
Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions
1) It wasn't a "decision" but it was "the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges."
2) Wouuld you like me to paraphrase you in response when CH and Bobqat post things in threads that aren't even close to the right place?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.