2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 31863
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Post by BDKJMU »

Tik Tok ban upheld. Doesn’t fall across the usual ideological lines, as have bipartisan conks and donks for the ban, and bipartisan conks and donks against it.
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Image
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 24681
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Post by UNI88 »

Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
...
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim majority, the power to impeach a judge with a simple majority vote. But, like a presidential impeachment, any removal requires a vote from a two-thirds majority from the Senate.
...
“What we are seeing is an attempt by one branch of government to intimidate another branch from performing its constitutional duty. It is a direct threat to judicial independence,” Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who specializes in the federal courts, said in an email.

Only one day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.”
And :dunce: on karoline leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 31863
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Post by BDKJMU »

UNI88 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts said. “The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
...
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives, where Republicans hold a slim majority, the power to impeach a judge with a simple majority vote. But, like a presidential impeachment, any removal requires a vote from a two-thirds majority from the Senate.
...
“What we are seeing is an attempt by one branch of government to intimidate another branch from performing its constitutional duty. It is a direct threat to judicial independence,” Marin Levy, a Duke University School of Law professor who specializes in the federal courts, said in an email.

Only one day earlier, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “I have not heard the president talk about impeaching judges.”
And :dunce: on karoline leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
So how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Image
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 24681
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Post by UNI88 »

BDKJMU wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 4:33 pm
UNI88 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:06 pm Roberts rejects Trump's call for impeaching judge who ruled against his deportation plans

And :dunce: on carolyn leavitt's statement. Does she not read her boss' Lie Social posts?
So how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?
What case? This was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 31863
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Post by BDKJMU »

UNI88 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 4:44 pm
BDKJMU wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 4:33 pm
So how did the other 8 justices vote in this case?
What case? This was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges.
This is the ‘2025 SCOTUS Decisions’ thread.
Proud deplorable Ultra MAGA fascist NAZI trash clinging to my guns and religion (and whatever else I’ve been labeled by Obama/Clinton/Biden/Harris).
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Image
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 24681
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: 2025 SCOTUS Decisions

Post by UNI88 »

BDKJMU wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 9:24 pm
UNI88 wrote: Tue Mar 18, 2025 4:44 pm
What case? This was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges.
This is the ‘2025 SCOTUS Decisions’ thread.
1) It wasn't a "decision" but it was "the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States commenting about the Radical Right Lunatics calling for the impeachment of judges."

2) Wouuld you like me to paraphrase you in response when CH and Bobqat post things in threads that aren't even close to the right place?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
Post Reply