Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Political discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by travelinman67 »

Gotta have the market and capacity before jobs will come back.

Washington just doesn't get it.

Capitol Hill needs to invite 100 industry captains into a closed-door session for a few days...THEN, maybe they'll wise up.

PROMISES, PROMISES: Jobs bill won't add many jobs
by The Associated Press
WASHINGTON February 11, 2010, 06:02 am ET

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/stor ... =123568224
There's a problem with the bipartisan jobs bill emerging in the Senate: It won't create many jobs.

The bill includes tax cuts to please Republicans and its passage would hand President Barack Obama a badly needed political victory. But even the Obama administration acknowledges the legislation's centerpiece — a tax cut for businesses that hire unemployed workers — would work only on the margins.

Tax experts and business leaders said companies are unlikely to hire workers just to receive a tax break. Before businesses start hiring, they need increased demand for their products, more work for their employees and more revenue to pay those workers.

"We're skeptical that it's going to be a big job creator," said Bill Rys, tax counsel for the National Federation of Independent Business. "There's certainly nothing wrong with giving a tax break to a business that's hired a new worker, especially in these tough times. But in terms of being an incentive to hire a lot of workers, we're skeptical."...

...The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office recently concluded that reducing Social Security taxes for companies that add workers would be among the most efficient ways for the government to create jobs. However, in showing how difficult it is to create jobs through tax policy, CBO estimates that such a tax break would generate only eight to 18 full-time jobs per $1 million in tax breaks.

The Senate proposal, which is more narrow than the one analyzed by CBO, is estimated to cost about $10 billion. That would add 80,000 to 180,000 jobs over the course of a year. The U.S. economy, meanwhile, has lost 8.4 million jobs since the start of the recession.

Democratic leaders had originally hoped to pass the bill this week, before record snowfalls effectively shut down Congress and much of the rest of the federal government in the nation's capital. Final action now may not come until March.

In addition to a tax break for hiring workers, the Senate package would extend unemployment payments for people without jobs for more than six months as well as subsidies to help the jobless continue paying premiums for health insurance they had been getting through their former employers...

...At a hearing last week, House Democrats peppered Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner with questions about whether a tax break for hiring workers will increase employment. Geithner defended the idea but acknowledged that businesses won't start hiring until demand for their products and services increases.

"I think this will provide a little bit more of a boost, a little more spark to make sure as we grow, we're creating more jobs than we otherwise would," he told the House Ways and Means Committee.

Rys, of the National Federation of Independent Business, said the credit could speed hiring once employers need more workers. But, he said, NFIB members aren't seeing many signs of improvement.

"Right now, business owners just don't have customers," Rys said. "Until you have work for the employee to do, there's really less of a reason to hire a new worker."
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by GannonFan »

Jobs will come back, just as they have after every economic downturn this country has experienced. Maybe not the same jobs and maybe not as many jobs in every area of the country, but eventually they will come back. And that's irregardless what government does. Granted, the government could speed up or slow down the process of the jobs coming back, but ultimately the jobs are created irregardless of government. Of course, that doesn't mean we won't blame politicians for jobs not being here right now nor does it mean we won't congratulate politicians who happen to be lucky enough to be in office when the jobs come back, but it is what it is.

On the bright side, the recovery is definitely coming. Working for a sizeable US manufacturer, we're about 150% versus target for sales recently, and hiring plenty of temps for the time being. We'll eventually pull out of this, regardless of what government is or isn't doing.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by kalm »

[quote]The bill includes tax cuts to please Republicans and its passage would hand President Barack Obama a badly needed political victory. But even the Obama administration acknowledges the legislation's centerpiece — a tax cut for businesses that hire unemployed workers — would work only on the margins.

Tax experts and business leaders said companies are unlikely to hire workers just to receive a tax break. Before businesses start hiring, they need increased demand for their products, more work for their employees and more revenue to pay those workers.[/quote]

Baldy and Cluck, please review carefully. :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by Appaholic »

& this surprises you how? Perhaps they should ease up in income taxes (& local fees for crissakes) on avg Americans so more money can be spent in the marketplace....thereby creating demand for more goods....thereby creating demand for more workers....which will create more goods for sale to people with more disposable income (since they are now working)...which creates sales tax revenue...which......
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by native »

Appaholic wrote:& this surprises you how? Perhaps they should ease up in income taxes (& local fees for crissakes) on avg Americans so more money can be spent in the marketplace....thereby creating demand for more goods....thereby creating demand for more workers....which will create more goods for sale to people with more disposable income (since they are now working)...which creates sales tax revenue...which......
...creates global warming... :roll:
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by Appaholic »

native wrote:
Appaholic wrote:& this surprises you how? Perhaps they should ease up in income taxes (& local fees for crissakes) on avg Americans so more money can be spent in the marketplace....thereby creating demand for more goods....thereby creating demand for more workers....which will create more goods for sale to people with more disposable income (since they are now working)...which creates sales tax revenue...which......
...creates global warming... :roll:
just cap-n-trade it....
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by AZGrizFan »

GannonFan wrote:Jobs will come back, just as they have after every economic downturn this country has experienced. Maybe not the same jobs and maybe not as many jobs in every area of the country, but eventually they will come back. And that's irregardless what government does. Granted, the government could speed up or slow down the process of the jobs coming back, but ultimately the jobs are created irregardless of government.
travelinman67 wrote:The Senate proposal, which is more narrow than the one analyzed by CBO, is estimated to cost about $10 billion. That would add 80,000 to 180,000 jobs over the course of a year. The U.S. economy, meanwhile, has lost 8.4 million jobs since the start of the recession.
So if, as Gannon says, the jobs will come back regardless of what Washington does, why in the FUCK are we going to spend $55,555 PER JOB CREATED, according to the CBO figures? And that's using the generous figure of 180,000 jobs created. It becomes $125,000/job at the lower 80,000 job figure.

This is exhibit A for what's wrong with this country. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by Appaholic »

AZGrizFan wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Jobs will come back, just as they have after every economic downturn this country has experienced. Maybe not the same jobs and maybe not as many jobs in every area of the country, but eventually they will come back. And that's irregardless what government does. Granted, the government could speed up or slow down the process of the jobs coming back, but ultimately the jobs are created irregardless of government.
travelinman67 wrote:The Senate proposal, which is more narrow than the one analyzed by CBO, is estimated to cost about $10 billion. That would add 80,000 to 180,000 jobs over the course of a year. The U.S. economy, meanwhile, has lost 8.4 million jobs since the start of the recession.
So if, as Gannon says, the jobs will come back regardless of what Washington does, why in the FUCK are we going to spend $55,555 PER JOB CREATED, according to the CBO figures? And that's using the generous figure of 180,000 jobs created. It becomes $125,000/job at the lower 80,000 job figure.

This is exhibit A for what's wrong with this country. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
& here's exhibit B & C...

Image
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:
The bill includes tax cuts to please Republicans and its passage would hand President Barack Obama a badly needed political victory. But even the Obama administration acknowledges the legislation's centerpiece — a tax cut for businesses that hire unemployed workers — would work only on the margins.

Tax experts and business leaders said companies are unlikely to hire workers just to receive a tax break. Before businesses start hiring, they need increased demand for their products, more work for their employees and more revenue to pay those workers.[/quote]

Baldy and Cluck, please review carefully. :thumb:
It's common sense to most. i just hope you are beginning to learn something, finally.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote:
The bill includes tax cuts to please Republicans and its passage would hand President Barack Obama a badly needed political victory. But even the Obama administration acknowledges the legislation's centerpiece — a tax cut for businesses that hire unemployed workers — would work only on the margins.

Tax experts and business leaders said companies are unlikely to hire workers just to receive a tax break. Before businesses start hiring, they need increased demand for their products, more work for their employees and more revenue to pay those workers.[/quote]

Baldy and Cluck, please review carefully. :thumb:
:lol:

You forgot to read the small print. :geek:

People want things...pent up demand is there. Fools still want big screen TVs because they have to keep up with the Joneses (marketing). But, they can't pay for them...because the wealthy haven't decided it is time to put money back into the system.

A long time ago, if someone wanted something, he could go into a field and gather some wealth from his labor. Not so anymore. It takes wealth to turn on the labor faucet...


You'll figure it out soon enough.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by CID1990 »

I like pie.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by kalm »

Cluck U wrote:
kalm wrote:
:lol:

You forgot to read the small print. :geek:

People want things...pent up demand is there. Fools still want big screen TVs because they have to keep up with the Joneses (marketing). But, they can't pay for them...because the wealthy haven't decided it is time to put money back into the system.

A long time ago, if someone wanted something, he could go into a field and gather some wealth from his labor. Not so anymore. It takes wealth to turn on the labor faucet...
Again, you're close. You're almost there. I'm rootin' for ya, I really am. :thumb:

So you're now agreeing with Galbraith, and I sense you're really close to agreeing with the article that demand will turn on the labor market.

If you can admit that I'm right in that regard too (albeit with the typical insult to mask your insecurity) we will then be done with our three-thread economic discussion.

You will have agreed with pretty much everything I have posted.

Don't let me down...we're almost home. :nod:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by native »

AZGrizFan wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Jobs will come back, just as they have after every economic downturn this country has experienced. Maybe not the same jobs and maybe not as many jobs in every area of the country, but eventually they will come back. And that's irregardless what government does. Granted, the government could speed up or slow down the process of the jobs coming back, but ultimately the jobs are created irregardless of government.
travelinman67 wrote:The Senate proposal, which is more narrow than the one analyzed by CBO, is estimated to cost about $10 billion. That would add 80,000 to 180,000 jobs over the course of a year. The U.S. economy, meanwhile, has lost 8.4 million jobs since the start of the recession.
So if, as Gannon says, the jobs will come back regardless of what Washington does, why in the FUCK are we going to spend $55,555 PER JOB CREATED, according to the CBO figures? And that's using the generous figure of 180,000 jobs created. It becomes $125,000/job at the lower 80,000 job figure.

This is exhibit A for what's wrong with this country. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
:lol: $55k per job would be a bargain.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by YoUDeeMan »

kalm wrote:
Cluck U wrote:
:lol:

You forgot to read the small print. :geek:

People want things...pent up demand is there. Fools still want big screen TVs because they have to keep up with the Joneses (marketing). But, they can't pay for them...because the wealthy haven't decided it is time to put money back into the system.

A long time ago, if someone wanted something, he could go into a field and gather some wealth from his labor. Not so anymore. It takes wealth to turn on the labor faucet...
Again, you're close. You're almost there. I'm rootin' for ya, I really am. :thumb:

So you're now agreeing with Galbraith, and I sense you're really close to agreeing with the article that demand will turn on the labor market.

If you can admit that I'm right in that regard too (albeit with the typical insult to mask your insecurity) we will then be done with our three-thread economic discussion.

You will have agreed with pretty much everything I have posted.

Don't let me down...we're almost home. :nod:

Nope...you said weath didn't create jobs...that demand created jobs. You are wrong. There will be no jobs without money. PERIOD. There will always be demand. There is no less demand now than there was two years ago...BUT THERE ISN'T AS MUCH MONEY.

Demand hasn't created jobs for quite some time...see Haiti and every third world country. You keep ignoring that huge gap in your theory and dismiss it as easily as those with money dismiss that part of the world's demands. They have oodles and oodles of demand...but no way to pay for their pent up demand. People still want new cars, and would even go into hock to get one...but the MONEY is not there.

Let's repeat...people still want to buy cars, TVs, homes, etc...but the MONEY is not there. Until the wealthy decide to put money back into the system, the jobs won't be there.

Case in point: if you suddenly provide very, very cheap loans for cars, but not houses, then you will see people purchase cars. Keep that up long enough and the jobs will follow in the car markets. Provide cheap loans to big screen TVs and people will buy big screen TVs...not cars. The jobs will then follow to the TV makers.

Sorry to take your old school theories to the crapper. Demand can sit there forever and won't be answered by a single job if money isn't given to grease the wheels.

On the other hand, money can create a job in a second. Money rules. People's wants, needs, demands, and desires come second...they all can be manipulated or ignored by those with the money.

To deny the above reality, as ugly as some may find it, is foolish. Seriously, how in the world can you ignore what is right in front of you?

And G-boy was right about the marketing component...I've already stated that many times over (you should at least try to read and understand the things someone is writing before you argue with them)...but he was wrong on too many other things to be taken seriously. The man worked in an enclosed system...oooops!
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
Rob Iola
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Lurking

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by Rob Iola »

GannonFan wrote:Jobs will come back, just as they have after every economic downturn this country has experienced. Maybe not the same jobs and maybe not as many jobs in every area of the country, but eventually they will come back. And that's irregardless what government does. Granted, the government could speed up or slow down the process of the jobs coming back, but ultimately the jobs are created irregardless of government. Of course, that doesn't mean we won't blame politicians for jobs not being here right now nor does it mean we won't congratulate politicians who happen to be lucky enough to be in office when the jobs come back, but it is what it is.

On the bright side, the recovery is definitely coming. Working for a sizeable US manufacturer, we're about 150% versus target for sales recently, and hiring plenty of temps for the time being. We'll eventually pull out of this, regardless of what government is or isn't doing.
Thanks GF! For all the bickering it's good to hear reasons for optimism.
Proletarians of the world, unite!
User avatar
Wedgebuster
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12260
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:06 pm
I am a fan of: UNC BEARS
A.K.A.: OB55
Location: Where The Rivers Run North

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by Wedgebuster »

Jeez, nobody can just create jobs from a political position. Especially since all our manufacturing has been outsourced already.

Small business, and especially very small business needs to have the confidence, and the financial backing to add a few jobs. Can't have much confidence when lenders refuse loans to small businesses.

In October, I hired my first employee since July of 1996. I used a personal line of credit last June to expand my business, because I was told small business loans were poisonous.

Actually used to money to buy a recreational dwelling in the mountains. :lol:

Paid it back in full at the end of October. :nod:

Make fun of my multi-dimensional political point of view fellas, but I did do my part here.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Promises, Promises: Jobs Bill Fails

Post by kalm »

Nope...you said weath didn't create jobs...that demand created jobs. You are wrong. There will be no jobs without money. PERIOD. There will always be demand. There is no less demand now than there was two years ago...BUT THERE ISN'T AS MUCH MONEY.

Demand hasn't created jobs for quite some time...see Haiti and every third world country. You keep ignoring that huge gap in your theory and dismiss it as easily as those with money dismiss that part of the world's demands. They have oodles and oodles of demand...but no way to pay for their pent up demand. People still want new cars, and would even go into hock to get one...but the MONEY is not there
.

Labor (jobs) creates wealth. There is less demand now not because there is less wealth amongst the rich, but because there is less wealth in the middle class.
Let's repeat...people still want to buy cars, TVs, homes, etc...but the MONEY is not there. Until the wealthy decide to put money back into the system, the jobs won't be there.


Why do third world countries like Haiti not have no wealth? Why do people in the U.S. have no money to buy a car? Why is it the wealthy have pulled their money from the system?
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply