These are my sentiments exactly. Plus, because she's the current Solicitor General, she is going to have recuse herself in many important cases which will come before the court during her first two or three years -- in almost every case in which the government has appeared and taken a position through the Office of the Solicitor General. There might be a number of cases, too many perhaps, affirming the opinion below based on a 4-4 split of the court, with Kagan abstaining.Ivytalk wrote:It could have been worse, I suppose. All else equal, I would have preferred someone with judicial experience. Arguing a handful of cases as Solicitor General and running Harvard Law School for a few years don't amount to the experience I'm looking for.![]()
At least she's not a community organizer.
BTW, isn't the Dean of Harvard Law by definition a community organizer?






