BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Political discussions
JoltinJoe
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7050
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by JoltinJoe »

Ivytalk wrote:It could have been worse, I suppose. All else equal, I would have preferred someone with judicial experience. Arguing a handful of cases as Solicitor General and running Harvard Law School for a few years don't amount to the experience I'm looking for. :|

At least she's not a community organizer. :coffee:
These are my sentiments exactly. Plus, because she's the current Solicitor General, she is going to have recuse herself in many important cases which will come before the court during her first two or three years -- in almost every case in which the government has appeared and taken a position through the Office of the Solicitor General. There might be a number of cases, too many perhaps, affirming the opinion below based on a 4-4 split of the court, with Kagan abstaining.

BTW, isn't the Dean of Harvard Law by definition a community organizer? ;)
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by Ivytalk »

JoltinJoe wrote:
Ivytalk wrote:It could have been worse, I suppose. All else equal, I would have preferred someone with judicial experience. Arguing a handful of cases as Solicitor General and running Harvard Law School for a few years don't amount to the experience I'm looking for. :|

At least she's not a community organizer. :coffee:
These are my sentiments exactly. Plus, because she's the current Solicitor General, she is going to have recuse herself in many important cases which will come before the court during her first two or three years -- in almost every case in which the government has appeared and taken a position through the Office of the Solicitor General. There might be a number of cases, too many perhaps, affirming the opinion below based on a 4-4 split of the court, with Kagan abstaining.

BTW, isn't the Dean of Harvard Law by definition a community organizer?
;)
Almost, JoltinJoe. The current dean, Martha Minow (who succeeded Kagan), also clerked for Thurgood Marshall and was nominated by BHO to serve on the board of Legal Services Corp. Her resume reflects a wide variety of other garden-variety liberal legal creds. I'm keeping my wallet zipped for yet another year. :coffee:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
Biff
Level1
Level1
Posts: 189
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:07 am
I am a fan of: The Citadel
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by Biff »

93henfan wrote:She's hot. I'm guessing that she's a strong proponent for gay rights?


Image
I thought for sure she was a man. It wasn't until I turned the sound on the TV hearing her name to find out otherwise.

Not very knowledgable in this area, but the fact that she is ugly at least gives me some hope that she has never gotten anything in life easy.
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Are there any attractive Supreme Court Justices... there haven't been many females and they're all ugly. Not sure why her appearance is that much of a surprise.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36357
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by BDKJMU »

danefan wrote:
GannonFan wrote:I've got no problem with the selection - she was clearly one of the more moderate of the bunch (I wouldn't had like it if he went with Wood as the pick). And, she's plenty bright enough. Yeah, she's nothing to look at, which makes the ban on live video of the SC a good thing, but all in all, I think she's a good pick.

It'll be interesting if there's any resistance to this pick, not from the right, which will probably make the requisite objections and questions, but really from the left. Many saw Stevens as the ultra-liberal on the bench (not that he was, but he was perceived that way) and some on the far left may think Kagan is far too moderate to replace Stevens (in essence letting the Court drift to the right). It'll be interesting how that goes.
Agreed.

Like his selection of Sotamayor, Obama has again pushed the Court to the right.
She has zero experience as a judge. Its been 40 years since their was a nominee with zero judicial experience. At least Rehnquist had significant litigation experience, which Kagan doesn't have. She argued what, a whopping 6 cases before SCOTUS as Solicitor Gen?

So no judicial experience. No significant trial experience. What, a doz law articles and a couple of book reviews? What exactly qualifies her to be a Supreme Ct justice? Would you want your head coach to be some who has no coaching experience? The Supreme Ct shouldn't be for on the job training.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36357
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by BDKJMU »

Obama said he wanted a Supreme Ct that looks like America. Well, lets see, the majority of the country is Protestant. Assuming Kagan is confirmed, the number of protestant Suprememe Ct judges will = Zero for the 1st time ever. Stevens was the last protestant on the Ct. Also the # of judges not a product of Harvard or Yale will now = Zero. (Stevens was Univ of Chicago & Northwestern).

Some diversity there.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: BREAKING: Obama Nominates Kagan For SCOTUS

Post by dbackjon »

BDKJMU wrote:Obama said he wanted a Supreme Ct that looks like America. Well, lets see, the majority of the country is Protestant. Assuming Kagan is confirmed, the number of protestant Suprememe Ct judges will = Zero for the 1st time ever. Stevens was the last protestant on the Ct. Also the # of judges not a product of Harvard or Yale will now = Zero. (Stevens was Univ of Chicago & Northwestern).

Some diversity there.

The Catholic/Jewish conspiracy!!




(Note, we do need more justices not from Harvard or Yale)
:thumb:
Post Reply