And this mentality is exactly what I was referring to when I stated environmentalists's are taking themselves out of the rational argument. The fact is we use coal & are going to use coal. So we need to lessen the impacts of both it's extraction & consumption as it is a viable soource of energy when used in a responsible manner. But to oppose it only because it is coal is a myopic view at best....HI54UNI wrote:The tree huggers are a big part of the problem because they are so blinded by their hatred of anything coal. For example Alliant Energy proposed to build a new coal fired plant and in exchange they would shut down 3 older plants. Although it was larger the new plant would have emitted less pollution because of all the new technology such as scrubbers, baghouses, etc. However the tree huggers fought them every step of the way so Alliant decided to give up and cancel the project. So we still have those 3 old plants emitting pollution everyday so Alliant can meet their power supply needs. Great move wasn't it?houndawg wrote:
Who else but tree huggers could possibly be opposed to breathing poison and removing mountaintops?
Wikileaks cables and Saudi oil:
- Appaholic
- Supporter

- Posts: 8583
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
- I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
- A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
- Location: Mills River, NC
Re: Wikileaks cables and Saudi oil:
http://www.takeahikewnc.com
“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck
Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck
Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Wikileaks cables and Saudi oil:
You need a better question- whether we're ready to pay more is irrelevant. You will pay more every year regardless of whether you're ready or not and regardless of where the new energy comes from. Like taxes.HI54UNI wrote:Nice deflection. Now answer the question. Are you ready to pay 25 cents a kwh (or more)? Are you ready to pay higher prices for everything you buy because electricity will cost Ford, Walmart, the farmer, etc. more? Are you ready for your taxes to go up so the schools and other government buildings can pay the higher costs? Are you ready to contribute more money, either through a personal donation or through higher taxes, so we can provide more heating assistance to the poor that can no longer afford their electric bill?Grizalltheway wrote:
Just tree huggers? What about people who live near them, and have to breathe the **** that comes out? Or people like Appa who get to see the tops of their mountains taken off?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Wikileaks cables and Saudi oil:
Also, why don't we take the billions in subsidies we give to oil companies and put it towards clean energy sources?houndawg wrote:You need a better question- whether we're ready to pay more is irrelevant. You will pay more every year regardless of whether you're ready or not and regardless of where the new energy comes from. Like taxes.HI54UNI wrote:
Nice deflection. Now answer the question. Are you ready to pay 25 cents a kwh (or more)? Are you ready to pay higher prices for everything you buy because electricity will cost Ford, Walmart, the farmer, etc. more? Are you ready for your taxes to go up so the schools and other government buildings can pay the higher costs? Are you ready to contribute more money, either through a personal donation or through higher taxes, so we can provide more heating assistance to the poor that can no longer afford their electric bill?
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Wikileaks cables and Saudi oil:
Oh please. If they wanted that plant their lobbyists would have seen to it. They have platoons of lawyers that eat treehuggers for breakfast every day.HI54UNI wrote:The tree huggers are a big part of the problem because they are so blinded by their hatred of anything coal. For example Alliant Energy proposed to build a new coal fired plant and in exchange they would shut down 3 older plants. Although it was larger the new plant would have emitted less pollution because of all the new technology such as scrubbers, baghouses, etc. However the tree huggers fought them every step of the way so Alliant decided to give up and cancel the project. So we still have those 3 old plants emitting pollution everyday so Alliant can meet their power supply needs. Great move wasn't it?houndawg wrote:
Who else but tree huggers could possibly be opposed to breathing poison and removing mountaintops?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine