Why is the MSM glorifying this? Where are the anti-war peace loving liberals?
President Obama should be impeached and tried for war crimes against humanity. Obama=Bush=Clinton=Bush=Reagan and so on.
Sad.



What we are doing in Libya now is in no way connected to Pan Am 103. Any attempt to create a linkage only makes you look foolish.blueballs wrote:Do these words carry any meaning- "Pan Am flight 103, Lockerbie, Scotland?"


Yes, and the people who thought Obama was nothing like his predecessors were naive. One person can't change the way Washington works and the way America does operates its foreign policy. Well, maybe one person could but he or she was probably aborted or died in a senseless war.catamount man wrote:...shown by the United States toward a country that has never attacked American soil, Libya. 48 innocent people DEAD.
Why is the MSM glorifying this? Where are the anti-war peace loving liberals?
President Obama should be impeached and tried for war crimes against humanity. Obama=Bush=Clinton=Bush=Reagan and so on.
Sad.


Agreed, but any attempt to portray the intervention in Libya as the USA attacking an innocent nation is even more foolish. BTW, The USA should have taken Qadaffi out after that terrorist attack back in the 1980's.CitadelGrad wrote:What we are doing in Libya now is in no way connected to Pan Am 103. Any attempt to create a linkage only makes you look foolish.blueballs wrote:Do these words carry any meaning- "Pan Am flight 103, Lockerbie, Scotland?"





Bronco wrote:“Make no mistake, today we are part of a broad coalition,”
BHO
5 partners and the ARAB League is already trying to pull out...
...after calling for a no fly zone
Arab League criticizes Western strikes on Libya
Canada.com/AFP ^ | 3/20/2011 | Unattributed
CAIRO - The Arab League on Sunday criticized Western military strikes on Libya, a week after urging the United Nations to slap a no-fly zone on the oil-rich North African state.
"What has happened in Libya differs from the goal of imposing a no-fly zone and what we want is the protection of civilians and not bombing other civilians," Arab League secretary general Amr Mussa told reporters.
On March 12, the Arab League urged the United Nations to impose a no-fly zone on Libya and said Moammar Gadhafi’s regime had "lost legitimacy" as it sought to snuff out a rebellion designed to oust him from power.
(Excerpt) Read more at canada.com ...



There are plenty of non-innocent nations we have attacked in the past and been pilloried for it.blueballs wrote:Agreed, but any attempt to portray the intervention in Libya as the USA attacking an innocent nation is even more foolish. BTW, The USA should have taken Qadaffi out after that terrorist attack back in the 1980's.CitadelGrad wrote:
What we are doing in Libya now is in no way connected to Pan Am 103. Any attempt to create a linkage only makes you look foolish.

We did try to take him out int he 80's. Reagan had his tent bombed and killed one of his kids. Anyway, if we decide to attack every nation that is not innocent, we'll be at war with the entire world. We were goaded into this by Britain and France who manipulated a weak ass president into continuing a costly and senseless interventionist foreign policy.blueballs wrote:Agreed, but any attempt to portray the intervention in Libya as the USA attacking an innocent nation is even more foolish. BTW, The USA should have taken Qadaffi out after that terrorist attack back in the 1980's.CitadelGrad wrote:
What we are doing in Libya now is in no way connected to Pan Am 103. Any attempt to create a linkage only makes you look foolish.



We'd have to attack ourselves. With Britain and France's permission of course.CitadelGrad wrote:We did try to take him out int he 80's. Reagan had his tent bombed and killed one of his kids. Anyway, if we decide to attack every nation that is not innocent, we'll be at war with the entire world. We were goaded into this by Britain and France who manipulated a weak ass president into continuing a costly and senseless interventionist foreign policy.blueballs wrote:
Agreed, but any attempt to portray the intervention in Libya as the USA attacking an innocent nation is even more foolish. BTW, The USA should have taken Qadaffi out after that terrorist attack back in the 1980's.

CitadelGrad wrote:We did try to take him out int he 80's. Reagan had his tent bombed and killed one of his kids. Anyway, if we decide to attack every nation that is not innocent, we'll be at war with the entire world. We were goaded into this by Britain and France who manipulated a weak ass president into continuing a costly and senseless interventionist foreign policy.

hey shitbird - I never said that - never implied - never thought it.Cluck U wrote:CitadelGrad wrote:We did try to take him out int he 80's. Reagan had his tent bombed and killed one of his kids. Anyway, if we decide to attack every nation that is not innocent, we'll be at war with the entire world. We were goaded into this by Britain and France who manipulated a weak ass president into continuing a costly and senseless interventionist foreign policy.![]()
Obama is killing civilians...the Arab League has already said we've gone too far. And a rebel fighter plane gets shot down....WTF was he doing flying in a no fly zone anyway?.
It's a Democrat's wet dream!
Hey, TTBF...are you working on the spin? How's the "Iran wants Bahrain as a province" thing going?


Agree. It was payback for goading weak ass Blair into Iraq....oh yeah, and for that whole "Freedom Fries" incident...don't fok with the French...CitadelGrad wrote:We were goaded into this by Britain and France who manipulated a weak ass president into continuing a costly and senseless interventionist foreign policy.

CID1990 wrote:
By the way, we HAVE attacked Libya before. In fact, I recall France refusing us permission to overfly their territory from Britain, which contributed to the loss of one of our F-111s along with the crew. I think France should be carrying the water on this one, if for no other reason than that.

