Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
- JohnStOnge
- Egalitarian

- Posts: 20316
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
- I am a fan of: McNeese State
- A.K.A.: JohnStOnge
Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
Over the past few days you may have seen news stories about how the current President is moving more towards Federal fleet use of alternative fuels. It caught my eye because about a month ago I was shaking my head upon seeing something that is already going on.
At least some Federal employees are being told they have to use alternative fuels in government vehicles capable of using them. Usually that means E-85 as there are pretty many flex-fuel vehicles. The employees in question were given the link http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/locator/stations/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and told they had to use it to plan their trips so that they'd go to stations that provide E-85. And they are supposed to go out of their way if necessary to do so. They were told there was once the potential for getting exceptions if alternative fuel wasn't sufficiently available but no more.
What this means is that at least some Federal employees are forced to incur substantially greater fuel cost. To begin with, you can see at http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com/?redirec ... /index.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; that it costs about 11% more to drive a given distance on E-85 fuel than it does on typical regular gasoline because, though E-85 costs less per gallon, it contains only about 75% of the energy per unit volume as gasoline does.
On top of that, the subject Federal emplloyees are required to drive additional miles in order to sometimes go out of their way in order to go to E-85 stations.
In the grand scheme of Federal spending I'm sure it isn't much. But should the Federal government really be pushing an internal policy that will raise fuel cost by something greater than 11% when, at the same time, it's kind of starting to hit the wall after decades of copious over spending?
At least some Federal employees are being told they have to use alternative fuels in government vehicles capable of using them. Usually that means E-85 as there are pretty many flex-fuel vehicles. The employees in question were given the link http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/locator/stations/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and told they had to use it to plan their trips so that they'd go to stations that provide E-85. And they are supposed to go out of their way if necessary to do so. They were told there was once the potential for getting exceptions if alternative fuel wasn't sufficiently available but no more.
What this means is that at least some Federal employees are forced to incur substantially greater fuel cost. To begin with, you can see at http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com/?redirec ... /index.asp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; that it costs about 11% more to drive a given distance on E-85 fuel than it does on typical regular gasoline because, though E-85 costs less per gallon, it contains only about 75% of the energy per unit volume as gasoline does.
On top of that, the subject Federal emplloyees are required to drive additional miles in order to sometimes go out of their way in order to go to E-85 stations.
In the grand scheme of Federal spending I'm sure it isn't much. But should the Federal government really be pushing an internal policy that will raise fuel cost by something greater than 11% when, at the same time, it's kind of starting to hit the wall after decades of copious over spending?
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
E-85 is not only more inefficient, it also hastens the deterioration of mechanical components.
http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblog ... thano.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblog ... thano.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
youngterrier
- Level3

- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
Obama is a socialist
-
TwinTownBisonFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
i really wish we'd convert the federal fleet to CNG (as much as is practical)
i really wonder why ups/fedex/usps haven't already done this...
i really wonder why ups/fedex/usps haven't already done this...
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions


- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
I'd imagine they'd have to phase it in over time, rather than just replacing their entire fleets at once.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:i really wish we'd convert the federal fleet to CNG (as much as is practical)
i really wonder why ups/fedex/usps haven't already done this...
-
TwinTownBisonFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
right - but instead they're going with regular gas hybrids... (an old high school buddy is ups driver... was telling me about this last week)Grizalltheway wrote:I'd imagine they'd have to phase it in over time, rather than just replacing their entire fleets at once.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:i really wish we'd convert the federal fleet to CNG (as much as is practical)
i really wonder why ups/fedex/usps haven't already done this...
also... holy shit on that sig dude...
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions


-
youngterrier
- Level3

- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
Could the case be made that one of the few things keeping middle eastern countries at bay (to an extent) is the fact that we buy so much oil from them? Granted, the U.S gets most of its oil from Canada, but think about it. They need the United States and other European countries to buy their oil to essentially drive their economy. If we didn't have that dependency, I don't think things would really improve relation-wise.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69154
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
This.TwinTownBisonFan wrote: also... holy shit on that sig dude...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What movie is that from? She looks like a younger Ann Archer but I'm guessing it's not her?
-
TwinTownBisonFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
MAD MEN dude... amazing show... and she's not the only good thing about it.kalm wrote:This.TwinTownBisonFan wrote: also... holy shit on that sig dude...![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What movie is that from? She looks like a younger Ann Archer but I'm guessing it's not her?
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions


- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Alternative Fuels and Government Spending
Troof.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:MAD MEN dude... amazing show... and she's not the only good thing about it.kalm wrote:
This.
What movie is that from? She looks like a younger Ann Archer but I'm guessing it's not her?




