Nice out of context quote. It was in reference to hospital visits which Tman was attributing to the deleterious physical affects of weed. Of course there can be long term affects.89Hen wrote:Hey kalm.kalm wrote:Weed in and of itself does not cause bodily harm.
who cares if its harmless or not?89Hen wrote:On a previous thread I specifically asked for pro-pot people to post their agreement that it was not harmless. I think maybe I got one response back.kalm wrote:
I don't think anyone said it was harmless. And there are **** tons of non-users who agree with legalization.
CID1990 wrote:who cares if its harmless or not?89Hen wrote: On a previous thread I specifically asked for pro-pot people to post their agreement that it was not harmless. I think maybe I got one response back.
i could care less if it makes peoples guts explode and their heads pop off
its their business
Hippie.Chizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
who cares if its harmless or not?
i could care less if it makes peoples guts explode and their heads pop off
its their business
This concept is lost on 89hen and T-man...
They are less government right up until you say Woman or Pot then they become Nanny State Fans
Its the strongest case of Cognitive Dissonance I've seen on this board
travelinman67 wrote:Hippie.Chizzang wrote:
This concept is lost on 89hen and T-man...
They are less government right up until you say Woman or Pot then they become Nanny State Fans
Its the strongest case of Cognitive Dissonance I've seen on this board
You have sunk to the level of Densedawg.
Read or go away...
http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... 75#p922993
Jeezus...I wonder what happened to you.
Don't go soft on me now
Not really. The ACA is a bit of a game changer with things like this.CID1990 wrote:who cares if its harmless or not?89Hen wrote: On a previous thread I specifically asked for pro-pot people to post their agreement that it was not harmless. I think maybe I got one response back.
i could care less if it makes peoples guts explode and their heads pop off
its their business
Oh lets play...CAA Flagship wrote:Not really. The ACA is a bit of a game changer with things like this.CID1990 wrote:
who cares if its harmless or not?
i could care less if it makes peoples guts explode and their heads pop off
its their business
i think the idea is that unhealthy lifestyles become everybody's business because everybody is payingChizzang wrote:Oh lets play...CAA Flagship wrote: Not really. The ACA is a bit of a game changer with things like this.
Do Tell why exactly the ACA and situations like this are "game Changers"
Not a big fan of pop, and I certainly wouldn't pay 30 dollars for it.CID1990 wrote:i think the idea is that unhealthy lifestyles become everybody's business because everybody is payingChizzang wrote:
Oh lets play...
Do Tell why exactly the ACA and situations like this are "game Changers"
and the government has an interest in telling you not to drink booze, eat big macs or smoke cigarettes or dope
in spite of that I still dont give a sh1t... it is our destiny that this government will ultimately kill our lifestyles while trying to improve them and it will bankrupt us in the process- and there is nothing we can do about it
so smoke and drink up while you still can for less than 30 dollars a pop
Dammit,CID1990 wrote:i think the idea is that unhealthy lifestyles become everybody's business because everybody is payingChizzang wrote:
Oh lets play...
Do Tell why exactly the ACA and situations like this are "game Changers"
and the government has an interest in telling you not to drink booze, eat big macs or smoke cigarettes or dope
in spite of that I still dont give a sh1t... it is our destiny that this government will ultimately kill our lifestyles while trying to improve them and it will bankrupt us in the process- and there is nothing we can do about it
so smoke and drink up while you still can for less than 30 dollars a pop
Sorry Cleets, major fail here. Show one instance where I said pot shouldn't be legal. You'll be searching a long time. My entire contention on several threads for the past several years is that there will be a LOT more problems with the legalization of pot than some of you will admit.Chizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
who cares if its harmless or not?
i could care less if it makes peoples guts explode and their heads pop off
its their business
This concept is lost on 89hen and T-man...
They are less government right up until you say Woman or Pot then they become Nanny State Fans
Its the strongest case of Cognitive Dissonance I've seen on this board
BTW, it's not a woman issue. You keep saying it in the hopes it will be so.Chizzang wrote:This concept is lost on 89hen and T-man...
They are less government right up until you say Woman
Sorry for being late to the party, Chizzy.Chizzang wrote:Dammit,CID1990 wrote:
i think the idea is that unhealthy lifestyles become everybody's business because everybody is paying
and the government has an interest in telling you not to drink booze, eat big macs or smoke cigarettes or dope
in spite of that I still dont give a sh1t... it is our destiny that this government will ultimately kill our lifestyles while trying to improve them and it will bankrupt us in the process- and there is nothing we can do about it
so smoke and drink up while you still can for less than 30 dollars a pop
I was waiting for Flagtard to tell me all about the dangers of Marijuana and how its all about the healthcare system and additional expenses treating pot smokers... and what do you do - but come crashing through my trap - and f**ck it all up...
BUT: The idea of pot being illegal because of our present healthcare system is so damned stupid I wanted Flaggy to share his deep insights into the "smart way to deal with Marijuana" and all that
CID1990 I can't take you anywhere anymore
CAA Flagship wrote:Sorry for being late to the party, Chizzy.Chizzang wrote:
Dammit,
I was waiting for Flagtard to tell me all about the dangers of Marijuana and how its all about the healthcare system and additional expenses treating pot smokers... and what do you do - but come crashing through my trap - and f**ck it all up...
BUT: The idea of pot being illegal because of our present healthcare system is so damned stupid I wanted Flaggy to share his deep insights into the "smart way to deal with Marijuana" and all that
CID1990 I can't take you anywhere anymore
Do you think warning labels on the sammich baggies should have stronger language? Currently they say this:
“There may be health risks associated with the consumption of this product.”
“This product was produced without regulatory oversight for health, safety, or efficacy.”
Oh, and like 89hen, I never said it should be illegal. I'm saying that if flies in the opposite direction of the ACA.
/thread.Chizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
who cares if its harmless or not?
i could care less if it makes peoples guts explode and their heads pop off
its their business
This concept is lost on 89hen and T-man...
They are less government right up until you say Woman or Pot then they become Nanny State Fans
Its the strongest case of Cognitive Dissonance I've seen on this board
Might as well put a warning label on chairs and couches because sitting will shorten your life vs. standing/walking.Chizzang wrote:CAA Flagship wrote: Sorry for being late to the party, Chizzy.
Do you think warning labels on the sammich baggies should have stronger language? Currently they say this:
“There may be health risks associated with the consumption of this product.”
“This product was produced without regulatory oversight for health, safety, or efficacy.”
Oh, and like 89hen, I never said it should be illegal. I'm saying that if flies in the opposite direction of the ACA.
Who cares what the warning label says..?
Nobody reads them - on anything - And how does raw sugar not have the LARGEST WARNING LABEL in all of consumable products sold over the counter...?
Sugar costs our healthcare system BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars
So how the hell are you still alive?CAA Flagship wrote:Might as well put a warning label on chairs and couches because sitting will shorten your life vs. standing/walking.Chizzang wrote:
Who cares what the warning label says..?
Nobody reads them - on anything - And how does raw sugar not have the LARGEST WARNING LABEL in all of consumable products sold over the counter...?
Sugar costs our healthcare system BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars
Grizalltheway wrote:So how the hell are you still alive?CAA Flagship wrote: Might as well put a warning label on chairs and couches because sitting will shorten your life vs. standing/walking.
Not sure. Damn I logged a bunch of hours on the couch this weekend. 
But isn't that the point you're trying to make..?CAA Flagship wrote:Might as well put a warning label on chairs and couches because sitting will shorten your life vs. standing/walking.Chizzang wrote:
Who cares what the warning label says..?
Nobody reads them - on anything - And how does raw sugar not have the LARGEST WARNING LABEL in all of consumable products sold over the counter...?
Sugar costs our healthcare system BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars
Oh the IRONYNo. The point I'm trying to make is that the legalization of pot is being introduced AFTER the mandated ACA. All the other bad shit was around before it. That's a big difference. How many more unhealthy things will we legalize/introduce/promote now that the producers are footing the healthcare costs?Chizzang wrote:But isn't that the point you're trying to make..?CAA Flagship wrote: Might as well put a warning label on chairs and couches because sitting will shorten your life vs. standing/walking.
Yes there are some dangers associated with Marijuana use - obviously
However its FAR LESS expensive to America than SUGAR abuse and Fast Food abuse
But we rally around those things like they were sacred tombs
Fast food and sugar abuse KILL more people and cost more than any drug
and we seriously seriously need to educate our endangered youth about the evils of those things - but instead we feed than that sh!t in our schools
depends on the revenue they generate...CAA Flagship wrote:No. The point I'm trying to make is that the legalization of pot is being introduced AFTER the mandated ACA. All the other bad shit was around before it. That's a big difference. How many more unhealthy things will we legalize/introduce/promote now that the producers are footing the healthcare costs?Chizzang wrote:
But isn't that the point you're trying to make..?
Yes there are some dangers associated with Marijuana use - obviously
However its FAR LESS expensive to America than SUGAR abuse and Fast Food abuse
But we rally around those things like they were sacred tombs
Fast food and sugar abuse KILL more people and cost more than any drug
and we seriously seriously need to educate our endangered youth about the evils of those things - but instead we feed than that sh!t in our schools
Does mcDonlads have a healthcare diet facility for their FAT clientele they're slowly killing..?Many pot smokers are health nuts. They eat lots of Kale and free range chicken. Instead of sleeping off an alcohol induced hangover most of the day, they tend to get up early and go for a mountain bike ride, snowshoeing, working in their organic garden and such.Chizzang wrote:depends on the revenue they generate...CAA Flagship wrote: No. The point I'm trying to make is that the legalization of pot is being introduced AFTER the mandated ACA. All the other bad shit was around before it. That's a big difference. How many more unhealthy things will we legalize/introduce/promote now that the producers are footing the healthcare costs?
Marijuana sales are taxed 25% from the farm to the re-seller and then 25% from the re-seller to the consumer and that revenue is used to pay for treatment centers and health facilities..!!!
Does sugar sales and McDonalds sh!t food Sales go towards any of that...?
kalm wrote:Many pot smokers are health nuts. They eat lots of Kale and free range chicken. Instead of sleeping off an alcohol induced hangover most of the day, they tend to get up early and go for a mountain bike ride, snowshoeing, working in their organic garden and such.Chizzang wrote:
depends on the revenue they generate...
Marijuana sales are taxed 25% from the farm to the re-seller and then 25% from the re-seller to the consumer and that revenue is used to pay for treatment centers and health facilities..!!!
Does sugar sales and McDonalds sh!t food Sales go towards any of that...?
Good for them.kalm wrote:Many pot smokers are health nuts. They eat lots of Kale and free range chicken. Instead of sleeping off an alcohol induced hangover most of the day, they tend to get up early and go for a mountain bike ride, snowshoeing, working in their organic garden and such.Chizzang wrote:
depends on the revenue they generate...
Marijuana sales are taxed 25% from the farm to the re-seller and then 25% from the re-seller to the consumer and that revenue is used to pay for treatment centers and health facilities..!!!
Does sugar sales and McDonalds sh!t food Sales go towards any of that...?
And yet you still have no argument that I can discern..?CAA Flagship wrote:Good for them.kalm wrote:
Many pot smokers are health nuts. They eat lots of Kale and free range chicken. Instead of sleeping off an alcohol induced hangover most of the day, they tend to get up early and go for a mountain bike ride, snowshoeing, working in their organic garden and such.
They get to go home with a star today.
So it's OK to stereotype when it fits your argument?
Sounds like something 89Hen would say, right?
