I use those with my AR-15 with the chainsaw attachment.

I use those with my AR-15 with the chainsaw attachment.
If it was obvious that Rittenhouse was going to be found guilty, would the National Guard be needed???
Well, that IS good news.
I don’t understand why the NG is needed for mostly peaceful protesters93henfan wrote:Wisconsin Governor Evers deploys 500 National Guard troops in anticipation of the verdict.
If a large group is out destroying property after curfew, they are rioters and looters, not peaceful anything, nor are they protesters.
Even if they're carrying their two plus boo vax card?
Yep. The DA clearly hadn’t read, or didn’t understand, the Wisconsin statute. Either way, the DA is a moron for charging for a crime that clearly isn’t a crime according to the statute, as Rittenhouse clearly wasn’t carrying an SBR, and the rifle he was carring he was allowed to possess..
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
I don't care if they are walking on their elbows, with their fingers up there ass.
The prosecution attorney with the thin tie and the spunk in his hair should be relieved of his job for stating today that because Rittenhouse brought a gun, he gave up his right to self defense.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 6:43 pmYep. The DA clearly hadn’t read, or didn’t understand, the Wisconsin statute. Either way, the DA is a moron for charging for a crime that clearly isn’t a crime according to the statute, as Rittenhouse clearly wasn’t carrying an SBR, and the rifle he was carring he was allowed to possess..
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Him charging Gooseneck should happen any day now then, shouldn't it?93henfan wrote:The prosecution attorney with the thin tie and the spunk in his hair should be relieved of his job for stating today that because Rittenhouse brought a gun, he gave up his right to self defense.BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 6:43 pm Yep. The DA clearly hadn’t read, or didn’t understand, the Wisconsin statute. Either way, the DA is a moron for charging for a crime that clearly isn’t a crime according to the statute, as Rittenhouse clearly wasn’t carrying an SBR, and the rifle he was carring he was allowed to possess..
Yeah, he actually said that.
What in the actual fuck?
I won't even get into all of the complete fallacies they tried to push about guns and ammo. What a complete shitshow of a prosecution.
Are underage people allowed to carry illegally purchased firearms?BDKJMU wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 6:43 pmYep. The DA clearly hadn’t read, or didn’t understand, the Wisconsin statute. Either way, the DA is a moron for charging for a crime that clearly isn’t a crime according to the statute, as Rittenhouse clearly wasn’t carrying an SBR, and the rifle he was carring he was allowed to possess..
Not to mention there's no chamber flag (at least not in the photo's i've seen) to indicate it's safe to handle in that setting.
The DA also has his finger on the trigger, as is contrasted by Rittenhouse who has his finger outside the trigger guard.