US Strikes Iran

[BDKJMU]

You can’t name anyone from any US or foreign intel agency who has disagreed with that assessment.

Badly damaged is NOT the same as obliterated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok Iran even admits to badly damaged.
Israel and the US say destroyed.

[kalm]

Badly damaged is NOT the same as obliterated.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok Iran even admits to badly damaged.
Israel and the US say destroyed.

So now we’re trusting Iran as to the condition of their uranium production weapons facilities? After they were judged?

Obliterated is how describe Hegseth at company a party.

[SeattleGriz]

Ok Iran even admits to badly damaged.
Israel and the US say destroyed.

So now we’re trusting Iran as to the condition of their uranium production weapons facilities? After they were judged?

Obliterated is how describe Hegseth at company a party.

Wow. I take a two week break from the dipshittery and when I come back, this Klan post is the first I see.

Love how American technology is inferior when it's dropped directly by US forces, but somehow top notch when second and third level old shit is cycled out for Ukraine as the next wonder weapon.

Can't make this up if you tried.

[Caribbean Hen]

So now we’re trusting Iran as to the condition of their uranium production weapons facilities? After they were judged?

Obliterated is how describe Hegseth at company a party.

Wow. I take a two week break from the dipshittery and when I come back, this Klan post is the first I see.

Love how American technology is inferior when it's dropped directly by US forces, but somehow top notch when second and third level old shit is cycled out for Ukraine as the next wonder weapon.

Can't make this up if you tried.

Been a bad streak for Clam

America is winning again

[Baldy]

Oleksandr Merezhko does not equal Buddy Carter (or the government of Pakistan).

My bad. You guys were referencing the "peace deal" that Trump claimed to have brokered. Even if it was true (it's wasn't) it lasted all of 11 minutes.

Pathetic

11 minutes?

Care to elaborate?

[Baldy]

Oleksandr Merezhko does not equal Buddy Carter (or the government of Pakistan).

Maybe Earl LeRoy "Buddy" Carter should take a break from sucking trump's tiny little penis and/or beating his wife/first cousin in their doublewide and actually read the qualifications.

The Nobel Prize should "be awarded to the person or group who has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses". I'm not sure dropping bombs on Iran does a lot for the fraternity of nations, abolition of standing armies or promotion of peace Congresses.

The same government of Pakistan that has overtly and covertly supported terrorists such as the Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba. The government that can't make up their mind - Pakistan condemns Trump's bombing of Iran - a day after nominating him for Peace Prize

Controversies aside, how far above "Buddy" and the governement of Pakistan is Oleksandr Merezhko?

If only you could have hyperventilated this vigorously when Obama was awarded the Nobel for doing nothing.

[bobbythekidd]

My bad. You guys were referencing the "peace deal" that Trump claimed to have brokered. Even if it was true (it's wasn't) it lasted all of 11 minutes.

Pathetic

11 minutes?

Care to elaborate?

Sorry brother. I should have included the /s. Peace was never agreed to. It didn't take long after Trump's announcement for missiles to start landing.

[Baldy]

11 minutes?

Care to elaborate?

Sorry brother. I should have included the /s. Peace was never agreed to. It didn't take long after Trump's announcement for missiles to start landing.

They agreed to a cease fire and no bombs have hit Iran or Israel in what? Three days now?

[Bobcat]

Wow. I take a two week break from the dipshittery and when I come back, this Klan post is the first I see.

Love how American technology is inferior when it's dropped directly by US forces, but somehow top notch when second and third level old shit is cycled out for Ukraine as the next wonder weapon.

Can't make this up if you tried.

Been a bad streak for Clam

America is winning again

When the USA wins Kkkalm gets the pouty face and his wittle eyes tear up

[UNI88]

Maybe Earl LeRoy "Buddy" Carter should take a break from sucking trump's tiny little penis and/or beating his wife/first cousin in their doublewide and actually read the qualifications.

The Nobel Prize should "be awarded to the person or group who has “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies, and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses". I'm not sure dropping bombs on Iran does a lot for the fraternity of nations, abolition of standing armies or promotion of peace Congresses.

The same government of Pakistan that has overtly and covertly supported terrorists such as the Taliban and Lashkar-e-Taiba. The government that can't make up their mind - Pakistan condemns Trump's bombing of Iran - a day after nominating him for Peace Prize

Controversies aside, how far above "Buddy" and the governement of Pakistan is Oleksandr Merezhko?

If only you could have hyperventilated this vigorously when Obama was awarded the Nobel for doing nothing.

I didn’t think Obama earned it either but I’m capable of putting my biases aside and being rational. You should try it sometime …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Baldy]

You can’t name anyone from any US or foreign intel agency who has disagreed with that assessment.

Well yeah…I’d hope not seeing how it’s intel.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/22/nx-s1-54 ... xperts-say

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics ... lear-sites

This must be why Hegseth and Trump’s only answer is the courage of our forces….which no one is disputing.

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

[UNI88]

Well yeah…I’d hope not seeing how it’s intel.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/22/nx-s1-54 ... xperts-say

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics ... lear-sites

This must be why Hegseth and Trump’s only answer is the courage of our forces….which no one is disputing.

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

russia collusion was not a hoax. There was evidence of communication but not enough for to prosecute. It was valid for news sources to investigate and report on the possible collusion. Lack of prosecution does not equal hoax. Calling it a hoax is reason eleventy billion and one why trump and MAQA yahoos can't be trusted.

The hunter laptop was another story and everyone who worked to bury it should be ashamed.

[kalm]

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

russia collusion was not a hoax. There was evidence of communication but not enough for to prosecute. It was valid for news sources to investigate and report on the possible collusion. Lack of prosecution does not equal hoax. Calling it a hoax is reason eleventy billion and one why trump and MAQA yahoos can't be trusted.

The hunter laptop was another story and everyone who worked to bury it should be ashamed.

As should Gulilanni for his involvement. R’s had it for how long brought it up at how many hearings when they were in control of the house? And yet nothing came of it other than Hunter traded off his Dad’s name. Same as the Trump children.

[SeattleGriz]

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

russia collusion was not a hoax. There was evidence of communication but not enough for to prosecute. It was valid for news sources to investigate and report on the possible collusion. Lack of prosecution does not equal hoax. Calling it a hoax is reason eleventy billion and one why trump and MAQA yahoos can't be trusted.

The hunter laptop was another story and everyone who worked to bury it should be ashamed.

Then you should easily be able to list off those "communications" for us right, Columbo? Put up or shut up.

[BDKJMU]

You can’t name anyone from any US or foreign intel agency who has disagreed with that assessment.

Well yeah…I’d hope not seeing how it’s intel.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/22/nx-s1-54 ... xperts-say

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics ... lear-sites

This must be why Hegseth and Trump’s only answer is the courage of our forces….which no one is disputing.

The 1st is 2 guys, 1 a college professor, with no access to classified intel. Now maybe they have contacts to some who do.

The 2nd, the CNN, was written by the same Fake News CNN reporter who reported the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo, and is is based on unnamed ‘sources‘. If the news was credible, it wouldn’t be unnamed sources.

So again you can’t name anyone from any US intel agency who has disagreed with that assessment. That would be a source with a name behind it (not anonymous).

[BDKJMU]

Oops..

[Caribbean Hen]

Been a bad streak for Clam

America is winning again

When the USA wins Kkkalm gets the pouty face and his wittle eyes tear up

Yes and ironically he’s never been anywhere

[Caribbean Hen]

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

russia collusion was not a hoax. There was evidence of communication but not enough for to prosecute. It was valid for news sources to investigate and report on the possible collusion. Lack of prosecution does not equal hoax. Calling it a hoax is reason eleventy billion and one why trump and MAQA yahoos can't be trusted.

The hunter laptop was another story and everyone who worked to bury it should be ashamed.

But the election wasn’t stolen

[Caribbean Hen]

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

russia collusion was not a hoax. There was evidence of communication but not enough for to prosecute. It was valid for news sources to investigate and report on the possible collusion. Lack of prosecution does not equal hoax. Calling it a hoax is reason eleventy billion and one why trump and MAQA yahoos can't be trusted.

The hunter laptop was another story and everyone who worked to bury it should be ashamed.

But the election wasn’t stolen and those one thousand yahoos should of just ignored it

[kalm]

Oops..

Yawn.

Retired.

So you can’t “you can’t name anyone from any US or foreign intel agency who has” confirmed Iran’s capabilities were obliterated.

No one knows the extent for sure was my point.

[BDKJMU]

Oops..

Yawn.

Retired.

So you can’t “you can’t name anyone from any US or foreign intel agency who has” confirmed Iran’s capabilities were obliterated.

No one knows the extent for sure was my point.

At least with that guy it’s a name person who was high level (probably still has a TSC,) who would have high level contacts.

The original CNN article written by the Fake News reporter who pushed the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo hoax, didn’t name a source, and didn‘t include it was low level confidence.

[kalm]

Yawn.

Retired.

So you can’t “you can’t name anyone from any US or foreign intel agency who has” confirmed Iran’s capabilities were obliterated.

No one knows the extent for sure was my point.

At least with that guy it’s a name person who was high level (probably still has a TSC,) who would have high level contacts.

The original CNN article written by the Fake News reporter who pushed the Hunter laptop was Russian disinfo hoax, didn’t name a source, and didn‘t include it was low level confidence.

It’s funny you think CNN represents all msm news. Do you have any idea how many former intelligence people are agreeing with me? That’s it’s too early to tell the extent of the damage, how long it will set them back, much less the misuse of the word obliterated, that preliminary reports suggest otherwise?

Defending Trump’s hubris and goofiness is an uphill climb. But you just keep trudging along.

[Bobcat]

Well yeah…I’d hope not seeing how it’s intel.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/22/nx-s1-54 ... xperts-say

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics ... lear-sites

This must be why Hegseth and Trump’s only answer is the courage of our forces….which no one is disputing.

Reason eleventy billion as to why you can never hate the 'press' enough and to never trust anything they say. The author of that article from CNN is Natasha Bertrand. She was the main protagonist at Business Insider pushing the Russia collusion hoax and the Hunter laptop is Russian disinformation hoax. She is one of the worst of the worst.

She ran with the assessment and basically and quite emphatically said in the article that the mission was a failure. However, she failed to inform the reader of one extremely important and glaring fact. The assessment had a "low confidence" tag attached to it. Journalistic malpractice.

[Bobcat]

When the USA wins Kkkalm gets the pouty face and his wittle eyes tear up

Yes and ironically he’s never been anywhere

He hotboxes, I think you have to travel to get one, don't you? Not a drug head so don't know

[kalm]

Yes and ironically he’s never been anywhere

He hotboxes, I think you have to travel to get one, don't you? Not a drug head so don't know

The hating in this thread exposes so much insecurity…