Cash for Clunkers!!!

[AZGrizFan]

Oh yes. Clearly it's a conspiracy.

Gullable donk fuck.

You have got to kidding me? Do you even know how graphs and charts are created?! It's not done by hand.

[Ibanez]

You have got to kidding me? Do you even know how graphs and charts are created?! It's not done by hand.

It's a simple fact. In the 21st century, multimedia corporations, schools, tv stations are using programs to create graphics. Define x and y, enter data points and you have a graph. A computer isn't going to show 8.6% higher than 8.9%...unless something is inverted. But that isn't the case. I'm not much for conspiracy but this is as obvious and biased as the MSNBC audio tapes of G. Zimmerman.

[Grizalltheway]

Oh yes. Clearly it's a conspiracy.

Gullable donk fuck.

You have got to kidding me? Do you even know how graphs and charts are created?! It's not done by hand.

Don't be silly. Only the evil left wing media is capable of bias or deception.

[AZGrizFan]

It's a simple fact. In the 21st century, multimedia corporations, schools, tv stations are using programs to create graphics. Define x and y, enter data points and you have a graph. A computer isn't going to show 8.6% higher than 8.9%...unless something is inverted. But that isn't the case. I'm not much for conspiracy but this is as obvious and biased as the MSNBC audio tapes of G. Zimmerman.

OK. Kudos to you for sniffing that one out, Poirot.

[Bronco]

-
Thanks for posting this old thread
I got a kick out of reading what the useful idiots were posting back then on how our golfer in chief was going to turn around the economy...you just wait and see

[Chizzang]

-
Thanks for posting this old thread
I got a kick out of reading what the useful idiots were posting back then on how our golfer in chief was going to turn around the economy...you just wait and see

have you ever actually added anything useful to a thread (ever?)

This has actually been a fascinating thread which you just dumbed down a whole notch by posting

[dbackjon]

-
Thanks for posting this old thread
I got a kick out of reading what the useful idiots were posting back then on how our golfer in chief was going to turn around the economy...you just wait and see

Lame.

Presidents really don't vacation - but since you brought it up...

[AZGrizFan]

-
Thanks for posting this old thread
I got a kick out of reading what the useful idiots were posting back then on how our golfer in chief was going to turn around the economy...you just wait and see

Lame.

Presidents really don't vacation - but since you brought it up...

Oh, that's rich.

[Ibanez]

It's a simple fact. In the 21st century, multimedia corporations, schools, tv stations are using programs to create graphics. Define x and y, enter data points and you have a graph. A computer isn't going to show 8.6% higher than 8.9%...unless something is inverted. But that isn't the case. I'm not much for conspiracy but this is as obvious and biased as the MSNBC audio tapes of G. Zimmerman.

OK. Kudos to you for sniffing that one out, Poirot.

When the facts are against you, make snide comments.

[houndawg]

-
Thanks for posting this old thread
I got a kick out of reading what the useful idiots were posting back then on how our golfer in chief was going to turn around the economy...you just wait and see

seen the DOW lately?

[AZGrizFan]

OK. Kudos to you for sniffing that one out, Poirot.

When the facts are against you, make snide comments.

Doesn't matter, right? I mean, all Fox viewers are retards anyway, so they can't comprehend the graph they're being shown anyways....at least that's what dipshitdog, dipshitboy and dipshitcat lead us to believe...

[houndawg]

When the facts are against you, make snide comments.

Doesn't matter, right? I mean, all Fox viewers are retards anyway, so they can't comprehend the graph they're being shown anyways....at least that's what dipshitdog, dipshitboy and dipshitcat lead us to believe...

Et tu, AZwipe?

First we get Tman sniveling about the mean ol' wibewuls rat packing him, then UNI88 starts whimpering about a "special hard-on" for Tman, Ibetalk laments the lack of substance in between his insults, and now you start with the crybaby sh*t too?

Bunch of pussies.

[AZGrizFan]

Doesn't matter, right? I mean, all Fox viewers are retards anyway, so they can't comprehend the graph they're being shown anyways....at least that's what dipshitdog, dipshitboy and dipshitcat lead us to believe...

Et tu, AZwipe?

First we get Tman sniveling about the mean ol' wibewuls rat packing him, then UNI88 starts whimpering about a "special hard-on" for Tman, Ibetalk laments the lack of substance in between his insults, and now you start with the crybaby sh*t too?

Bunch of pussies.

Well, which is it? ARE Fox viewers too stupid to understand? Or is it a vast conspiracy? Because it can't be both.

[houndawg]

Et tu, AZwipe?

First we get Tman sniveling about the mean ol' wibewuls rat packing him, then UNI88 starts whimpering about a "special hard-on" for Tman, Ibetalk laments the lack of substance in between his insults, and now you start with the crybaby sh*t too?

Bunch of pussies.

Well, which is it? ARE Fox viewers too stupid to understand? Or is it a vast conspiracy? Because it can't be both.

The former.

[AZGrizFan]

Well, which is it? ARE Fox viewers too stupid to understand? Or is it a vast conspiracy? Because it can't be both.

The former.

Then the graph is irrelevant. Which was my point all along.

[Baldy]

Lame.

Presidents really don't vacation - but since you brought it up...

Source: Maddow Blog

[Ibanez]

When the facts are against you, make snide comments.

Doesn't matter, right? I mean, all Fox viewers are retards anyway, so they can't comprehend the graph they're being shown anyways....at least that's what dipshitdog, dipshitboy and dipshitcat lead us to believe...

It does matter. I never said anything about Fox viewers. I don't know them. Well, a few. They're level-headed people. The problem lies with journalistic integrity (or the lack thereof). Fox isn't the only guilty party, far from it.

[AZGrizFan]

You didn't even read either the article or the paper did you...
(Admit it)

If you'd like I'll begin explaining all of the things wrong with the paper

He read it, and just like Fox News expects, he didn't question anything nor did he think to himself, " Well, a $3B reduction in auto industry revenue of 9-11 months isn't ideal for them, but maybe those people saved the money. Or paid off a debt. Or bought something else. "

Really? Didn't say anything about Fox News viewers?

[Ibanez]

He read it, and just like Fox News expects, he didn't question anything nor did he think to himself, " Well, a $3B reduction in auto industry revenue of 9-11 months isn't ideal for them, but maybe those people saved the money. Or paid off a debt. Or bought something else. "

Really? Didn't say anything about Fox News viewers?

Where in that did I say "retard" or say they can't "comprehend"? Yup. I made a blanket statement. My bad. As if you have NEVER made a blanket statement about anyone or anything? The "Holier than thou" attitude suits no one.


Fact remains, Fox News skewed a visual to continue their obsessive agenda against anything Obama related. I don't like Obama, but c'mon. It's hardly the first time a major news org has mislead the public with facts. I can't think of any CNN examples at the moment.

[AZGrizFan]

Really? Didn't say anything about Fox News viewers?

Where in that did I say "retard" or say they can't "comprehend"? Yup. I made a blanket statement. My bad. As if you have NEVER made a blanket statement about anyone or anything? The "Holier than thou" attitude suits no one.


Fact remains, Fox News skewed a visual to continue their obsessive agenda against anything Obama related. I don't like Obama, but c'mon.

I don't make blanket statements. So, to make sure I've got this straight, YOU believe Fox News is embroiled in a vast conspiracy to rail against anything Obama related, while dipshitdawg believes Fox views are idiots and couldn't comprehend a flawed graph anyways.

[kalm]

Where in that did I say "retard" or say they can't "comprehend"? Yup. I made a blanket statement. My bad. As if you have NEVER made a blanket statement about anyone or anything? The "Holier than thou" attitude suits no one.


Fact remains, Fox News skewed a visual to continue their obsessive agenda against anything Obama related. I don't like Obama, but c'mon.

I don't make blanket statements. So, to make sure I've got this straight, YOU believe Fox News is embroiled in a vast conspiracy to rail against anything Obama related, while dipshitdawg believes Fox views are idiots and couldn't comprehend a flawed graph anyways.

Fox producers aren't smart enough to realize their audience isn't smart enough to read descriptive graphs.

[AZGrizFan]

I don't make blanket statements. So, to make sure I've got this straight, YOU believe Fox News is embroiled in a vast conspiracy to rail against anything Obama related, while dipshitdawg believes Fox views are idiots and couldn't comprehend a flawed graph anyways.

Fox producers aren't smart enough to realize their audience isn't smart enough to read descriptive graphs.

[Ibanez]

Where in that did I say "retard" or say they can't "comprehend"? Yup. I made a blanket statement. My bad. As if you have NEVER made a blanket statement about anyone or anything? The "Holier than thou" attitude suits no one.


Fact remains, Fox News skewed a visual to continue their obsessive agenda against anything Obama related. I don't like Obama, but c'mon.

I don't make blanket statements. So, to make sure I've got this straight, YOU believe Fox News is embroiled in a vast conspiracy to rail against anything Obama related, while dipshitdawg believes Fox views are idiots and couldn't comprehend a flawed graph anyways.

Yes. Yes you do. Every time you say "liberals" or "donks" or "progressives". Your shit must smell like roses.

But, there's no conspiracy. Fox News misrepresents the facts. Fox News is the Anti-obama channel. He could cure HIV and Fox News would find a sinister angle. Those are facts. Hounddawg can believe what he wants, but I don't think it's mature or correct to assume every Republican is evil, every Democrat is going to raise your taxes, every Southerner is dumb and every blonde girl is an easy lay.

[AZGrizFan]

I don't make blanket statements. So, to make sure I've got this straight, YOU believe Fox News is embroiled in a vast conspiracy to rail against anything Obama related, while dipshitdawg believes Fox views are idiots and couldn't comprehend a flawed graph anyways.

Yes. Yes you do. Every time you say "liberals" or "donks" or "progressives". Your shit must smell like roses.

But, there's no conspiracy. Fox News misrepresents the facts. Fox News is the Anti-obama channel. He could cure HIV and Fox News would find a sinister angle. Those are facts. Hounddawg can believe what he wants, but I don't think it's mature or correct to assume every Republican is evil, every Democrat is going to raise your taxes, every Southerner is dumb and every blonde girl is an easy lay.

Perhaps you missed the sarcasm there. Go back and reread it, then get back to me.

[Ibanez]

Yes. Yes you do. Every time you say "liberals" or "donks" or "progressives". Your shit must smell like roses.

But, there's no conspiracy. Fox News misrepresents the facts. Fox News is the Anti-obama channel. He could cure HIV and Fox News would find a sinister angle. Those are facts. Hounddawg can believe what he wants, but I don't think it's mature or correct to assume every Republican is evil, every Democrat is going to raise your taxes, every Southerner is dumb and every blonde girl is an easy lay.

Perhaps you missed the sarcasm there. Go back and reread it, then get back to me.

I probably did. That's why you need to use or