Coronavirus COVID-19

Political discussions
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SDHornet »

kalm wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:16 pm
SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:48 am

Make sure you tell your un-vaxxed employees and coworkers to stay away from public places. :coffee:
That’s your choice as a parent. Just be prepared to stay home a lot until this wave blows over.

Your turn.
Not too worried. All this is just as enforceable as the mask mandates...hence the push for digital vax passports.

It's all about control folks like you and Ganny is totally on board with "safety" at the expense of freedom.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SDHornet »

BDKJMU wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:27 pm
GannonFan wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 9:59 am

I don't care what the DNC thinks. I will never agree to vaccine mandates for everyone. But I have no problem with places like schools and hospitals and public transportation and international travel and restaurants and gyms and other locations requiring vaccinations to use those facilities. You make a choice if you want to use those places or if you want to stay unvaccinated. Your call.

And just because you have a magical 8 year window before you deem a vaccination to be safe doesn't mean that others have to abide by your 8 year window. We didn't do that before with other vaccines so I don't see why this one needs such special protection.
If a private business wants to mandate proof of vaccine or negative test for their customers that is their right.. But govt has no business telling private businesses like restaurants, bars, gyms, private schools, pro sports teams, etc, that they have to mandate it for their customers.
Yup.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SDHornet »

Gil Dobie wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:39 pm
AshevilleApp wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:30 pm

Okay. Are Texas and Florida being hit hard right now? That might explain the news focus. I'm paying more attention to how things are going locally, so haven't tried to keep up nationally.
Florida deaths per million is going up faster than most states right now. California isn't in the top 25, actually #36.
We stopped counting once the recall became an issue for Newsom.
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SDHornet »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:38 pm
JohnStOnge wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:34 pm

A number of the States near the top of the list got hit before the country really had come to grips with what was going on. They got hit first. Like New York. Yes. Things were very bad there in the beginning. But now things are much worse in Florida and Texas. As of now, if you use the Worldometers site, you calculate that during August to date there have been 22 COVID-19 deaths per million population in New York vs. 87 in Texas and a whopping 166 in Florida.

And it's happening in the context of a situation in which the Governor's of Texas and Florida are obviously acting like complete idiots. Texas and Florida don't have the legitimate "excuse" of having been blindsided like New York was. Texas and Florida just have an obvious "Party of Stupid" problem.
I believe this is their seasonal surge...and Delta. Both had spikes starting in June last year as well.
There was a reason for the spike last June. For some reason I can't remember what it was though...
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by Ibanez »

SDHornet wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 12:05 pm Then why the liability removal? Why the dual approach now that Pfizer has been “approved”? :coffee: :coffee:
Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.
The liability has been law since the 80s so it’s nothing new. It’s not as if it was created specifically for the COVID-19 vaccine. At one point is also covered any serious side effects from Viagra.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SDHornet »

Ibanez wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:19 pm
SDHornet wrote:
Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.
The liability has been law since the 80s so it’s nothing new. It’s not as if it was created specifically for the COVID-19 vaccine. At one point is also covered any serious side effects from Viagra.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pfizer has a squeaky clean record so I'm sure everything with this vax is all good.
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by JohnStOnge »

SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:52 pm
kalm wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 1:16 pm

That’s your choice as a parent. Just be prepared to stay home a lot until this wave blows over.

Your turn.
Not too worried. All this is just as enforceable as the mask mandates...hence the push for digital vax passports.

It's all about control folks like you and Ganny is totally on board with "safety" at the expense of freedom.
Obviously we have a lot of laws that restrict freedom in the interest of safety. I don't even need to give a whole bunch of examples. I am against many of them. Like the one example I'll give: Seat belt laws. But the difference between something like a seat belt law and a mask mandate is obvious. When you don't wear a seat belt, you compromise your own safety. VERY unlikely that you're compromising the safety of anybody else. When you refuse to comply with a mask mandate, you are compromising the safety of other people.

I have always said that Libertarianism is the idea that you can do whatever you want as long as you don't cross the line into obviously affecting other people. And this nut job anti mask stuff as well as the nut job anti vax stuff is obviously putting other people at risk. You have a right to not wear a mask up until the point where you are around somebody else. And you have a right to be unvaccinated. But other people have the right to say you can't be around them if you are not wearing a mask and/or you are not vaccinated.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19504
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SDHornet »

JohnStOnge wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:34 pm
SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:52 pm

Not too worried. All this is just as enforceable as the mask mandates...hence the push for digital vax passports.

It's all about control folks like you and Ganny is totally on board with "safety" at the expense of freedom.
Obviously we have a lot of laws that restrict freedom in the interest of safety. I don't even need to give a whole bunch of examples. I am against many of them. Like the one example I'll give: Seat belt laws. But the difference between something like a seat belt law and a mask mandate is obvious. When you don't wear a seat belt, you compromise your own safety. VERY unlikely that you're compromising the safety of anybody else. When you refuse to comply with a mask mandate, you are compromising the safety of other people.

I have always said that Libertarianism is the idea that you can do whatever you want as long as you don't cross the line into obviously affecting other people. And this nut job anti mask stuff as well as the nut job anti vax stuff is obviously putting other people at risk. You have a right to not wear a mask up until the point where you are around somebody else. And you have a right to be unvaccinated. But other people have the right to say you can't be around them if you are not wearing a mask and/or you are not vaccinated.
Seat belt laws are used to keep people out of public places? Who knew!
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18758
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SeattleGriz »

SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:46 pm
AZGrizFan wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 12:05 pm

Then why the liability removal? Why the dual approach now that Pfizer has been “approved”? :coffee: :coffee:
Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.
If Pfizer got the approval, by law Moderna and J&J lose their EUA status, as there is an approved vaccine on the market, but that hasn't happened. I understand the approval to be for a future version that has not been manufactured yet.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by JohnStOnge »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:35 pm
SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:46 pm

Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.
If Pfizer got the approval, by law Moderna and J&J lose their EUA status, as there is an approved vaccine on the market,
I suspect that's not true. But if it is that's bad because the Moderna vaccine appears to be the most effective COVID-19 vaccine.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18758
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SeattleGriz »

JohnStOnge wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:48 pm
SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:35 pm

If Pfizer got the approval, by law Moderna and J&J lose their EUA status, as there is an approved vaccine on the market,
I suspect that's not true. But if it is that's bad because the Moderna vaccine appears to be the most effective COVID-19 vaccine.
It's true, but to be honest, why would you all of a sudden ban two vaccines that have been used quite extensively? I could see a sidestepping of that rule being justified.

It true because that is why you heard so much bitching about HCQ and Ivermectin. People are saying that's why they "buried" those two, because if there was something effective, the vaccines could have not gotten their EUAs in the first place.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by ∞∞∞ »

SeattleGriz wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:35 pm
SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:46 pm

Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.
If Pfizer got the approval, by law Moderna and J&J lose their EUA status, as there is an approved vaccine on the market, but that hasn't happened. I understand the approval to be for a future version that has not been manufactured yet.
I had to look this up and it seems to be a misinterpretation of the law.

The law says you can't issue an EUA when there's an approved vaccine on the market. Moderna and J&J already had EUAs issued before Pfizer received its FDA approval. They wouldn't be able to get an EUA if they tried now, but nothing in the law says it's lost once another drug is approved. In fact, the termination reasons are specifically stated in section (a)(2):

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

Basically the EUA is terminated if the Secretary of Health & Human Services determines the reason for the EUA doesn't exist anymore or the status of the product has changed (ex. it gained FDA approval or has been rejected).
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by Ibanez »

SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:22 pm
Ibanez wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 5:19 pm
The liability has been law since the 80s so it’s nothing new. It’s not as if it was created specifically for the COVID-19 vaccine. At one point is also covered any serious side effects from Viagra.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pfizer has a squeaky clean record so I'm sure everything with this vax is all good.
That's a deflection, SD. None of them have a squeaky clean record. Neither does any car company, telecommunication company, restaurant, apparel maker, home builder, etc... You ever taken a prescription pill before? You want to bet that Pharma company has done something dirty?


The point is...the liability shield is neither new nor nefarious. It's been in existence since 1988 with additional legislation in 2005. And it doesn't last forever, just 4 years. It's just a talking point but once you look at the history and realize that there isn't any special treatment being afforded the manufacturers of COVID vaccines, objectively, I don't see how you can use it against them in terms of the COVID vaccine. :twocents:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by 89Hen »

JohnStOnge wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:34 pm A number of the States near the top of the list got hit before the country really had come to grips with what was going on. They got hit first. Like New York. Yes. Things were very bad there in the beginning. But now things are much worse in Florida and Texas.
So it's like college football. Lose badly early in the season and you can still make the playoffs, but lose a closer game later in the year and you're toast.
Image
∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12373
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by ∞∞∞ »

89Hen wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:10 am
JohnStOnge wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:34 pm A number of the States near the top of the list got hit before the country really had come to grips with what was going on. They got hit first. Like New York. Yes. Things were very bad there in the beginning. But now things are much worse in Florida and Texas.
So it's like college football. Lose badly early in the season and you can still make the playoffs, but lose a closer game later in the year and you're toast.
Bad comparison considering we were still trying to understand Covid, how it spread, how to treat it at the hospital, nor did we have vaccines.
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by 89Hen »

∞∞∞ wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:27 am
89Hen wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:10 am

So it's like college football. Lose badly early in the season and you can still make the playoffs, but lose a closer game later in the year and you're toast.
Bad comparison considering we were still trying to understand Covid, how it spread, how to treat it at the hospital, nor did we have vaccines.
Meh. Those states at the top of the list did worse than others.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67775
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by kalm »

∞∞∞ wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:27 am
89Hen wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:10 am

So it's like college football. Lose badly early in the season and you can still make the playoffs, but lose a closer game later in the year and you're toast.
Bad comparison considering we were still trying to understand Covid, how it spread, how to treat it at the hospital, nor did we have vaccines.
Red states are like UNI. Ranked to start, fall from rankings after a brutal OOC and early conferences losses, but then a late resurgence with a couple of quality wins to eek out an at-large, followed by the boat racing of a weaker conference champ, only to lose in the 2nd round. Will start the next surge ranked high again due in part to Massey.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18758
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:45 am
∞∞∞ wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:27 am

Bad comparison considering we were still trying to understand Covid, how it spread, how to treat it at the hospital, nor did we have vaccines.
Red states are like UNI. Ranked to start, fall from rankings after a brutal OOC and early conferences losses, but then a late resurgence with a couple of quality wins to eek out an at-large, followed by the boat racing of a weaker conference champ, only to lose in the 2nd round. Will start the next surge ranked high again due in part to Massey.
You just said out loud what I was thinking of UNI! :lol:

Montana is the Texas of FCS, so we've got no room to criticize though.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 28817
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by UNI88 »

89Hen wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:10 am
JohnStOnge wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:34 pm A number of the States near the top of the list got hit before the country really had come to grips with what was going on. They got hit first. Like New York. Yes. Things were very bad there in the beginning. But now things are much worse in Florida and Texas.
So it's like college football. Lose badly early in the season and you can still make the playoffs, but lose a closer game later in the year and you're toast.
The early stages and now are two different seasons. NY won the pre-vaccine COVID death championship. The post-vaccine/delta+ variant championship is still up for grabs.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by 89Hen »

kalm wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:45 am
∞∞∞ wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:27 am

Bad comparison considering we were still trying to understand Covid, how it spread, how to treat it at the hospital, nor did we have vaccines.
Red states are like UNI. Ranked to start, fall from rankings after a brutal OOC and early conferences losses, but then a late resurgence with a couple of quality wins to eek out an at-large, followed by the boat racing of a weaker conference champ, only to lose in the 2nd round. Will start the next surge ranked high again due in part to Massey.
:lol: :notworthy: I think we've started something here.
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by GannonFan »

SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:46 pm
AZGrizFan wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 12:05 pm

Then why the liability removal? Why the dual approach now that Pfizer has been “approved”? :coffee: :coffee:
Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.

Huh? Where are you reading that it's just an extension of the emergency use status? It's fully approved, has a brand name now and everything. No different than any other approved vaccine that's been on the market in the past.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by Ibanez »

GannonFan wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:15 am
SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:46 pm

Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.

Huh? Where are you reading that it's just an extension of the emergency use status? It's fully approved, has a brand name now and everything. No different than any other approved vaccine that's been on the market in the past.
This one is different! It's covered under a liability shield that the avg person didn't know existed. RAWR!
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39258
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by 89Hen »

This aged well.

Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18758
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by SeattleGriz »

GannonFan wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:15 am
SDHornet wrote: Thu Aug 26, 2021 4:46 pm

Saw that this "approval" was just an extension of their emergency use status. Not sure if true.

And yes, good point on the liability removal.

Huh? Where are you reading that it's just an extension of the emergency use status? It's fully approved, has a brand name now and everything. No different than any other approved vaccine that's been on the market in the past.
But can you go out and actually get the brand name version right now, or do you have to get the original under the EUA?
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19120
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Coronavirus COVID-19

Post by GannonFan »

SeattleGriz wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:39 am
GannonFan wrote: Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:15 am


Huh? Where are you reading that it's just an extension of the emergency use status? It's fully approved, has a brand name now and everything. No different than any other approved vaccine that's been on the market in the past.
But can you go out and actually get the brand name version right now, or do you have to get the original under the EUA?
??? You want to make a distinction between what was manufactured prior to the FDA giving the full approval and that that was made after they signed the paper? Why is that a distinction point? To get full approval requires not only the testing, but it requires things like the FDA auditing and inspecting the manufacturing facilities. The process to make the vaccine and the methods/equipment to do so haven't changed since they've embarked on the path to full authorization.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Post Reply