HI54UNI wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:The sad thing about this is that Hillary could have just immediately said, "Well, my Doctor told me Friday I have pneumonia and told me to take it easy but I decided to go ahead and keep going. Guess I should've listened to her" Something like that. And that probably would've worked in her favor. Being a determined trooper and all that.
I don't know why she hasn't figured out yet that this "privacy" thing of hers gets her in trouble.
Except that wouldn't fit what actually happened over the weekend. She was supposedly diagnosed on Friday and then went to fundraisers. So if she would've skipped the 9/11 memorial that would've shown that her donors are more important than remembering 9/11 (which they probably are).
How can you support anyone who's first reaction to everything is to lie and deceive? There isn't an honest bone in her body.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1584f/1584f8dc635bb7c273e633826fd05f582ab153bf" alt="Oh No :ohno:"
Are you serious? The answer to your question is obvious. The other realistic alternative lies even more. And he's completely nuts. I can't believe you even asked that question.
If you want to say Clinton is dishonest, fine. But the problem you have is that Trump is even MORE dishonest. Plus he's got the emotional maturity of a 12 year old and has absolutely no clue.
How can YOU support an alternative who lies even more than Clinton does and who is basically a middle school kid in a 70 year old man's body? Plus all sorts of other problems.
At least she has SOME clue as to what's going on in the world. The alternative does not.