89Hen wrote:Cluck U wrote:
I'm perfectly OK with other people dying and suffering to benefit me. In reality, you are OK with it, too.
So it is funny that pro-life people are concerned about the life of a fetus, but no so concerned about how that fetus ends up living...or dying...so long as the pro-life people's lifestyles aren't negatively impacted.
A lot of what you say is correct... and then you don't stop and go too far with the last paragraph.
Everyone is a hypocrite, even the most ardent supporters of a "noble" cause (PETA, Greenpeace, etc..). However, I can't do anything to change labor laws in Vietnam other than not buy a particular shirt. You have to admit, that's not a big impact. Along those same lines, I don't do enough to help the pro-life agenda. We used to cook dinners a couple times a month for a local pregnancy center, but we haven't done that in a while. I haven't written my political leaders in a long time. I could do more. But that doesn't change my stance on this issue.
Sure it doesn't change your stance on the issue...but it sure does sum up your choices about how you choose to live. You'd rather live comfortably and have people die for your way of life rather than live off the grid and leave no casualties.
It is quite silly to say that buying a shirt made by slaves is OK because if you didn't buy that shirt (oh, such a sacrifice you'd be making) it would not make that much difference. That goes right back to the study that shows people care more about, or relate better towards, one person suffering in a picture versus a group of people suffering.
At some point, somewhere inside of us, it becomes OK not to care about the lives of others when it stops being about individuals.
We are dropping bombs on people in multiple countries, and you'd be hard pressed to find a time we weren't. And, despite the rhetoric to the contrary, we aren't bombing and killing a bunch of people that were going to attack you tomorrow. We ousted Ghaddaffi for what...to bring peace to Libya?

We want Assad out for what reason? Why did we oust a Democratically elected leader of Egypt...right after we supported a revolution that would give people Democracy?

Why are we dealing with the Kurds? Why are we supporting the countries we support? We are still in Afghanistan...why?
This isn't rocket science...we kill for resources. Always have, always will. Sure, it isn't advertised as murder, but it sure is murder. Casualties of a necessary war?

Huh? That is only true if you say that the war is necessary for you to drive your car. Progress, 89. We kill for progress. Lots of innocent people die for your shirts, your phone, your car, and your standard of living.
And you are OK with that. You really are.
And I don't think that is a bad thing.
