Hillary "overheating".

[JohnStOnge]

I has pneumonia when I was 31 or 32. I was relatively in shape and working out regularly back then.
Anyway, it was not a bad case and just barely visible(liquid in the lung) on the xray.
I was flat on my back for 10 days. I would be completely exhausted climbing the stairs.

How does a 70 year old woman, recover from that **** in hours? Or even a couple days.

As noted, she actually could have made the thing a positive if the first thing that would've come out was something like, "My Doctor told me I have pneumonia and recommended I take it easy but I didn't listen."

As time goes on, though, I wonder if what happened is that her staff didn't know what was up. I think it's possible they told the press what they told the press because she was hiding her condition from THEM. I say that because while listening to the radio driving around I heard a thing about how during the late 1990s she had a blood clot issue and hid it from her staff. She had a nurse traveling with her and took steps to keep her staff from knowing it was a nurse.

I just shake my head. Like in that 1990s thing. WHY on EARTH would she be worried about her own staff knowing she had a blood clot? She was the First Lady. What on EARTH is the down side of having the First Lady's staff know she had a blood clot issue?

It's like she has this privacy thing just for the sake of having a privacy thing.

[HI54UNI]

I has pneumonia when I was 31 or 32. I was relatively in shape and working out regularly back then.
Anyway, it was not a bad case and just barely visible(liquid in the lung) on the xray.
I was flat on my back for 10 days. I would be completely exhausted climbing the stairs.

How does a 70 year old woman, recover from that **** in hours? Or even a couple days.

As noted, she actually could have made the thing a positive if the first thing that would've come out was something like, "My Doctor told me I have pneumonia and recommended I take it easy but I didn't listen."

As time goes on, though, I wonder if what happened is that her staff didn't know what was up. I think it's possible they told the press what they told the press because she was hiding her condition from THEM. I say that because while listening to the radio driving around I heard a thing about how during the late 1990s she had a blood clot issue and hid it from her staff. She had a nurse traveling with her and took steps to keep her staff from knowing it was a nurse.

I just shake my head. Like in that 1990s thing. WHY on EARTH would she be worried about her own staff knowing she had a blood clot? She was the First Lady. What on EARTH is the down side of having the First Lady's staff know she had a blood clot issue?

It's like she has this privacy thing just for the sake of having a privacy thing.

Except she didn't/doesn't have pneumonia.

[andy7171]

I has pneumonia when I was 31 or 32. I was relatively in shape and working out regularly back then.
Anyway, it was not a bad case and just barely visible(liquid in the lung) on the xray.
I was flat on my back for 10 days. I would be completely exhausted climbing the stairs.

How does a 70 year old woman, recover from that **** in hours? Or even a couple days.

As noted, she actually could have made the thing a positive if the first thing that would've come out was something like, "My Doctor told me I have pneumonia and recommended I take it easy but I didn't listen."

As time goes on, though, I wonder if what happened is that her staff didn't know what was up. I think it's possible they told the press what they told the press because she was hiding her condition from THEM. I say that because while listening to the radio driving around I heard a thing about how during the late 1990s she had a blood clot issue and hid it from her staff. She had a nurse traveling with her and took steps to keep her staff from knowing it was a nurse.

I just shake my head. Like in that 1990s thing. WHY on EARTH would she be worried about her own staff knowing she had a blood clot? She was the First Lady. What on EARTH is the down side of having the First Lady's staff know she had a blood clot issue?

It's like she has this privacy thing just for the sake of having a privacy thing.

That's the whole issue. She lies, denies, floats out possible reasons, denies again, releases as little real info, denies she lies, lies again and then says its old news a year later.

But that's your vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[93henfan]

As noted, she actually could have made the thing a positive if the first thing that would've come out was something like, "My Doctor told me I have pneumonia and recommended I take it easy but I didn't listen."

As time goes on, though, I wonder if what happened is that her staff didn't know what was up. I think it's possible they told the press what they told the press because she was hiding her condition from THEM. I say that because while listening to the radio driving around I heard a thing about how during the late 1990s she had a blood clot issue and hid it from her staff. She had a nurse traveling with her and took steps to keep her staff from knowing it was a nurse.

I just shake my head. Like in that 1990s thing. WHY on EARTH would she be worried about her own staff knowing she had a blood clot? She was the First Lady. What on EARTH is the down side of having the First Lady's staff know she had a blood clot issue?

It's like she has this privacy thing just for the sake of having a privacy thing.

That's the whole issue. She lies, denies, floats out possible reasons, denies again, releases as little real info, denies she lies, lies again and then says its old news a year later.

But that's your vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She's a sociopath. Smiling in your face while reaching around and putting the knife in your back. There are a lot of dead people in her wake who tell no tales.

I have no problem at all putting up with Trump just to keep that wretched cunt away from the White House.

[Ivytalk]

As noted, she actually could have made the thing a positive if the first thing that would've come out was something like, "My Doctor told me I have pneumonia and recommended I take it easy but I didn't listen."

As time goes on, though, I wonder if what happened is that her staff didn't know what was up. I think it's possible they told the press what they told the press because she was hiding her condition from THEM. I say that because while listening to the radio driving around I heard a thing about how during the late 1990s she had a blood clot issue and hid it from her staff. She had a nurse traveling with her and took steps to keep her staff from knowing it was a nurse.

I just shake my head. Like in that 1990s thing. WHY on EARTH would she be worried about her own staff knowing she had a blood clot? She was the First Lady. What on EARTH is the down side of having the First Lady's staff know she had a blood clot issue?

It's like she has this privacy thing just for the sake of having a privacy thing.

That's the whole issue. She lies, denies, floats out possible reasons, denies again, releases as little real info, denies she lies, lies again and then says its old news a year later.

But that's your vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Andy FTW!

[CAA Flagship]

Ed Klein: Hillary Has a Bad Heart Valve, Turned Down Surgery

Hillary Clinton has a heart valve problem and turned down advice from her doctors to have surgery in order to avoid any public fallout from it, author Ed Klein said Monday night.

Klein, the author of "Guilty as Sin: Uncovering New Evidence of Corruption and How Hillary Clinton and the Democrats Derailed the FBI Investigation" spoke with Sean Hannity on Fox News regarding his new book about the Clintons.

After confirming Clinton has an irregular heart beat, Klein said her health problems are far worse.

"She has a heart valve problem. The doctors wanted to replace the valve and she didn't do it," Klein said.

When Hannity followed up by saying a doctor would discuss with a patient fixing a heart valve condition via surgery, Klein said that conversation took place.

"They did and she said no because she was worried if she had, it would leak out that she had a surgery and that would somehow undercut her presidential race."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ed-Kle ... id/751503/

[Skjellyfetti]

lol

looney tunes

[Ibanez]

Ed Klein: Hillary Has a Bad Heart Valve, Turned Down Surgery

Hillary Clinton has a heart valve problem and turned down advice from her doctors to have surgery in order to avoid any public fallout from it, author Ed Klein said Monday night.

Klein, the author of "Guilty as Sin: Uncovering New Evidence of Corruption and How Hillary Clinton and the Democrats Derailed the FBI Investigation" spoke with Sean Hannity on Fox News regarding his new book about the Clintons.

After confirming Clinton has an irregular heart beat, Klein said her health problems are far worse.

"She has a heart valve problem. The doctors wanted to replace the valve and she didn't do it," Klein said.

When Hannity followed up by saying a doctor would discuss with a patient fixing a heart valve condition via surgery, Klein said that conversation took place.

"They did and she said no because she was worried if she had, it would leak out that she had a surgery and that would somehow undercut her presidential race."

That sounds nice but some independent verification and proof would be nice.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ed-Kle ... id/751503/

[CAA Flagship]

lol

looney tunes

Skepticism is fine. Denial is dangerous.

[Baldy]

lol

looney tunes

Skepticism is fine. Denial is dangerous.

Absolutely, and definitely not out of the realm of possibility.

[Skjellyfetti]

Who is keeping track?

I think something like hypothyroidism, Parkinson's, dementia, pneumonia, MS, heart valve problem.

Am I missing anything "not outside the realm of possibility"?

[CID1990]

I have light hypothyroidism which is why I hypothesized that if something really is wrong with her it could be that- lightheadedness and oversensitivity to heat. She isn't flushy in the face though, but makeup could cover that

If that is what it is, it really isn't that much of a concern


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Ivytalk]

Who is keeping track?

I think something like hypothyroidism, Parkinson's, dementia, pneumonia, MS, heart valve problem.

Am I missing anything "not outside the realm of possibility"?

Herpes.

[Ibanez]

Who is keeping track?

I think something like hypothyroidism, Parkinson's, dementia, pneumonia, MS, heart valve problem.

Am I missing anything "not outside the realm of possibility"?

Parvo

Spoiler: show

Before BDK makes a dumb comment - I know it's only in animals.

[JohnStOnge]

Some of the internals of the CNN post debate poll (http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/image ... ll.pdf.pdf) illustrate why I don't watch these debates. They're not really debates.

More respondents said Mike Pence won than said Kaine won. 48% vs. 42%. So why was that.

It wasn't because of command of the issues. 48% of respondents said Kaine had better command of the issues vs. 41% who said Pence did.

It wasn't because Pence did a better job of defending the top of his ticket. 58% said Kaine did a better job of that vs. 35% who said Pence did.

So how is it that more thought Pence won if Kaine had better command of the issues and did a better job of defending the top of the ticket?

I think I know. 53% thought Pence was more likeable vs. 37% who thought Kaine did.

Plus I'm guessing the moderator let Pence get away with repeatedly lying in saying Trump didn't say things that he did say. I'm guessing, for instance, that when Pence said Trump didn't say NATO is obsolete the moderator didn't say, "Wait a second Mr. Pence, he did say that."

And I do believe moderators in these things should do that. In fact, they should have an earpiece so staff can let them know when somebody lies like that so they can immediately call them on it.

I think if they did that Trump and his side would have no side because the whole Trump campaign lies SO much.

[SeattleGriz]

Who is keeping track?

I think something like hypothyroidism, Parkinson's, dementia, pneumonia, MS, heart valve problem.

Am I missing anything "not outside the realm of possibility"?

Herpes.

Don't forget about the shitbag and her adult diapers.

[Ivytalk]

Some of the internals of the CNN post debate poll (http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/image ... ll.pdf.pdf) illustrate why I don't watch these debates. They're not really debates.

More respondents said Mike Pence won than said Kaine won. 48% vs. 42%. So why was that.

It wasn't because of command of the issues. 48% of respondents said Kaine had better command of the issues vs. 41% who said Pence did.

It wasn't because Pence did a better job of defending the top of his ticket. 58% said Kaine did a better job of that vs. 35% who said Pence did.

So how is it that more thought Pence won if Kaine had better command of the issues and did a better job of defending the top of the ticket?

I think I know. 53% thought Pence was more likeable vs. 37% who thought Kaine did.

Plus I'm guessing the moderator let Pence get away with repeatedly lying in saying Trump didn't say things that he did say. I'm guessing, for instance, that when Pence said Trump didn't say NATO is obsolete the moderator didn't say, "Wait a second Mr. Pence, he did say that."

And I do believe moderators in these things should do that. In fact, they should have an earpiece so staff can let them know when somebody lies like that so they can immediately call them on it.

I think if they did that Trump and his side would have no side because the whole Trump campaign lies SO much.

If you don't watch the debates, why do you give two shits who "wins" them?