Cooter is also a turtle!Grizalltheway wrote:Cooter is from Tennessee.kalm wrote:
Oh. Sorry. They sounded southern?

Cooter is also a turtle!Grizalltheway wrote:Cooter is from Tennessee.kalm wrote:
Oh. Sorry. They sounded southern?
I was just trying to keep you involved in the conversation, but I guess no good deed goes unpunished these days.kalm wrote:Then maybe you shouldn't have quoted me and used the cup of coffee emoji, AZGrizFanalltheway...Grizalltheway wrote:
So you were correct in saying he's Southern, Derwyn.
Sorry, Home Skillet. Ibanez was being a know-it-all again and I took it out on you.Grizalltheway wrote:I was just trying to keep you involved in the conversation, but I guess no good deed goes unpunished these days.kalm wrote:
Then maybe you shouldn't have quoted me and used the cup of coffee emoji, AZGrizFanalltheway...
Can't blame you for that. Smarmy little cunt!kalm wrote:Sorry, Home Skillet. Ibanez was being a know-it-all again and I took it out on you.Grizalltheway wrote:
I was just trying to keep you involved in the conversation, but I guess no good deed goes unpunished these days.
A snapper!Ibanez wrote:Cooter is also a turtle!Grizalltheway wrote:
Cooter is from Tennessee.
http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ru ... cia-2017-1It was set up after the director of the CIA, John Brennan, received a recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into Trump's campaign coffers, the BBC's Paul Wood reported. The recording was passed to him by the intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States, according to the BBC. On October 15, the task force was granted a warrant by a judge in the FISA court — named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act — to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks that may have been implicated in the money transfer, a senior intelligence official told the BBC. Trump was not named in the warrant, but three of his associates were the subject of the inquiry.
There's definitely some smoke still with this one....Skjellyfetti wrote:http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ru ... cia-2017-1It was set up after the director of the CIA, John Brennan, received a recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into Trump's campaign coffers, the BBC's Paul Wood reported. The recording was passed to him by the intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States, according to the BBC. On October 15, the task force was granted a warrant by a judge in the FISA court — named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act — to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks that may have been implicated in the money transfer, a senior intelligence official told the BBC. Trump was not named in the warrant, but three of his associates were the subject of the inquiry.
The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeachedkalm wrote:There's definitely some smoke still with this one....Skjellyfetti wrote: http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ru ... cia-2017-1
And the joke will be on Vlad.CID1990 wrote:The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeachedkalm wrote:
There's definitely some smoke still with this one....
Skjellyfetti wrote:http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ru ... cia-2017-1It was set up after the director of the CIA, John Brennan, received a recording of a conversation about money from the Kremlin going into Trump's campaign coffers, the BBC's Paul Wood reported. The recording was passed to him by the intelligence agency of one of the Baltic States, according to the BBC. On October 15, the task force was granted a warrant by a judge in the FISA court — named after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act — to intercept the electronic records from two Russian banks that may have been implicated in the money transfer, a senior intelligence official told the BBC. Trump was not named in the warrant, but three of his associates were the subject of the inquiry.
Hypothetically, if that were to happen, I wonder who Pence would choose as VP.CID1990 wrote:The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeachedkalm wrote:
There's definitely some smoke still with this one....
If Trump didn't know, then how would he be impeached?CID1990 wrote:The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeachedkalm wrote:
There's definitely some smoke still with this one....
Fair question. I guess he could ask Chris Christie...Cluck U wrote:If Trump didn't know, then how would he be impeached?CID1990 wrote:
The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeached
This is a guy that has so much to hide he won't even submit his taxes...CID1990 wrote:The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeachedkalm wrote:
There's definitely some smoke still with this one....
Indeed, the shock that people seem to have regarding the potential that Trump may have received campaign money from a foreign donor is almost nonsensical when those same people turned a blind eye to the Clinton Foundation doing the same thing for at least the past 8 years. And it's not like the Clinton's were even hiding it. ABCNews even did an almost "gosh, it's so blatant we have to say something" piece on the pay-to-play stuff that happened in Haiti right in the light of day, and most people just shrugged it off.Ibanez wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote: http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-ru ... cia-2017-1
Awesome
Meanwhile, foreign donors have been cancelling multi-million dollar donations to the Clinton Global Initiative since their chosen one lost.
It really is humorous, isn't it?GannonFan wrote:Indeed, the shock that people seem to have regarding the potential that Trump may have received campaign money from a foreign donor is almost nonsensical when those same people turned a blind eye to the Clinton Foundation doing the same thing for at least the past 8 years. And it's not like the Clinton's were even hiding it. ABCNews even did an almost "gosh, it's so blatant we have to say something" piece on the pay-to-play stuff that happened in Haiti right in the light of day, and most people just shrugged it off.Ibanez wrote:
Awesome
Meanwhile, foreign donors have been cancelling multi-million dollar donations to the Clinton Global Initiative since their chosen one lost.
And the same people that spent eight years demanding to see a birth certificate aren't the slightest bit curious about Trump's taxes or his ties to the Russian mob.Chizzang wrote:This is a guy that has so much to hide he won't even submit his taxes...CID1990 wrote:
The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeached
With a Republican Congress? No way.CID1990 wrote:The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeachedkalm wrote:
There's definitely some smoke still with this one....
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
At this point, what difference does it make?Cluck U wrote:If Trump didn't know, then how would he be impeached?CID1990 wrote:
The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeached
Just when you thought the ironic entertainment was done for until 2018.Cluck U wrote:It really is humorous, isn't it?GannonFan wrote:
Indeed, the shock that people seem to have regarding the potential that Trump may have received campaign money from a foreign donor is almost nonsensical when those same people turned a blind eye to the Clinton Foundation doing the same thing for at least the past 8 years. And it's not like the Clinton's were even hiding it. ABCNews even did an almost "gosh, it's so blatant we have to say something" piece on the pay-to-play stuff that happened in Haiti right in the light of day, and most people just shrugged it off.
I think a lot of rules and conventions are going out the window in this administration.Skjellyfetti wrote:With a Republican Congress? No way.CID1990 wrote:
The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeached
He's already gaslighted the MSM enough that no matter what comes out... it can just be dismissed as "gotcha journalism" or "fake news"
Also, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg on the Russia stuff. They want to see a peaceful transition of power and then it's game on. These Russia rumors are going to escalate like nothing we've ever seen before as leaks emerge and more reputable people confirm what's so far suspected.
Hey, he used the "gaslighting" term. My women's studies prof friend from Facebook uses that term relentlessly, along with all the other academia terms used to silence the opposition or those with differing thoughts. Awesome that you're picking up on it too now!Skjellyfetti wrote:With a Republican Congress? No way.CID1990 wrote:
The good news is that if there is something to this I don't think this admin will be adept enough to sidestep it or spin it away. Trump would be impeached
He's already gaslighted the MSM enough that no matter what comes out... it can just be dismissed as "gotcha journalism" or "fake news"
Also, I think this is just the tip of the iceberg on the Russia stuff. They want to see a peaceful transition of power and then it's game on. These Russia rumors are going to escalate like nothing we've ever seen before as leaks emerge and more reputable people confirm what's so far suspected.