
She will be flying this flag on Tuesday night:




That guy just signed his own death warrant.Baldy wrote: This guy is the former assistant director of the FBI and likened the Clinton Foundation to organized crime. A "cesspool". Called her a "pathological liar".
And you want to put that shit in the White House? Full fucking retard.

I rooting for a tie.Ibanez wrote:A tie would most likely mean neither Clinton or Trump wouldn't win. A tie would be a historical event. A tie would be more interesting than anything that has happened in the past 18(?) months.kalm wrote:
A tie would extend the election which you said cant go away fast enough in another thread.

kalm wrote:I rooting for a tie.Ibanez wrote: A tie would most likely mean neither Clinton or Trump wouldn't win. A tie would be a historical event. A tie would be more interesting than anything that has happened in the past 18(?) months.


Ibanez wrote:A tie would most likely mean neither Clinton or Trump wouldn't win. A tie would be a historical event. A tie would be more interesting than anything that has happened in the past 18(?) months.kalm wrote:
A tie would extend the election which you said cant go away fast enough in another thread.
Why don't you not mind your own business? I don't not like how you make fun of Ibanez using double negatives. I don't want no flack from you about it neither. Flak either.Grizalltheway wrote:Ibanez wrote: A tie would most likely mean neither Clinton or Trump wouldn't win. A tie would be a historical event. A tie would be more interesting than anything that has happened in the past 18(?) months.

93henfan wrote:Why don't you not mind your own business? I don't not like how you make fun of Ibanez using double negatives. I don't want no flack from you about it neither. Flak either.Grizalltheway wrote:
Not to sound like a one-nutted Palousian, but ground flax seed in Greek yogurt with some fresh blueberries ain't half bad.CAA Flagship wrote:93henfan wrote:
Why don't you not mind your own business? I don't not like how you make fun of Ibanez using double negatives. I don't want no flack from you about it neither. Flak either.



Guhhh....aaa!93henfan wrote:Not to sound like a one-nutted Palousian, but ground flax seed in Greek yogurt with some fresh blueberries ain't half bad.CAA Flagship wrote:
ARE YOU CHOKING? I WILL HELP YOU!!kalm wrote:Guhhh....aaa!93henfan wrote:
Not to sound like a one-nutted Palousian, but ground flax seed in Greek yogurt with some fresh blueberries ain't half bad.
DAMNIT!Grizalltheway wrote:Ibanez wrote: A tie would most likely mean neither Clinton nor Trump wouldn't win. A tie would be a historical event. A tie would be more interesting than anything that has happened in the past 18(?) months.
FIFY.Grizalltheway wrote:Real faggots eat Kashi.


You're so sweet, you little sugar hound.Grizalltheway wrote:Real niggas eat Kashi.

Ibanez wrote:A tie would most likely mean neither Clinton or Trump wouldn't win. A tie would be a historical event. A tie would be more interesting than anything that has happened in the past 18(?) months.kalm wrote:
A tie would extend the election which you said cant go away fast enough in another thread.

I apologize.Grizalltheway wrote:Words hurt, Baldy.




The no-margin-for-error map
This one, according to polls, is probably Trump's best bet -- but it's also one in which he has no margin for error.
Trump could carry every state Mitt Romney won in 2012 (including North Carolina) and flip the Barack Obama states of Florida, Ohio, Iowa, Nevada and New Hampshire.
How tight would this path be? So tight that Trump would also have to lock up Nebraska's Omaha-based congressional district and Maine's rural district to get those single electoral votes.
f there's a 'silent majority' of working-class whites
This is Trump's dream scenario, because it cracks Clinton's blue wall of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania -- which he hasn't been able to win in polls.
In this map, Trump doesn't need to sweat tight races in Nevada or New Hampshire.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/03/politics/ ... index.htmlIf Clinton bleeds votes to Gary Johnson
Three smaller, fiercely independent states could tip from Clinton's column to Trump's if she loses many of the Republican-leaning voters who just aren't comfortable with Trump -- not to the GOP nominee, but to Libertarian Gary Johnson.
Those states are Nevada, New Hampshire and Colorado -- all places where Johnson has beaten his poll numbers from big swing states -- and they'd be enough for Trump to win
Bronco wrote:-
Wasn't there a post on how dumb Trump voters are? Here are progs showing off

[/quote]Ibanez wrote:6 Ways Trump can win
f there's a 'silent majority' of working-class whites
This is Trump's dream scenario, because it cracks Clinton's blue wall of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania -- which he hasn't been able to win in polls.
In this map, Trump doesn't need to sweat tight races in Nevada or New Hampshire.



