By the time someone is making 100's millions of dollars, they are no longer being rewarded for their productivity, they are being rewarded for their power. It becomes anti-democratic.native wrote:Kalm, you advocate broad, sweeping prescriptions that wipe out hundreds or thousands of times more healthy cells than diseased cells, and in the end may not not cure the disease and will introduce even more insidious diseases.kalm wrote:
And...please explain how the productive class has been taken advantage of and how, based on productivity you justify compensation that is 100's if not 1,000's of times greater than the average worker. What does a hedge fund manager produce?
Also, regardless of McCain-Feingold, corporate rights are not enumerated in the constitution, and public funding of elections is the answer. Let a candidate or politician stand on the issues and their voting record, conservative or liberal.
Why does it bother you so much that someone makes more money? Why is it so very important to tear someone else down? Markets suck, but they work better than anything else.
Markets suck when, through a lack of regulation they create and entrench oligarchies. Broad sweeping prescriptions are required right now because broad sweeping changes have occurred to our financial system. Glass-Steagal was a broad, sweeping prescription that worked pretty well.









