AFAIK, this hasn't been the case with MO's initiative. But again, conks still label her as fascist control freak for trying to reduce childhood obesity.Cluck U wrote:Hey, if the government wants to encourage people to eat a healthy meal, yee-ha! But what the government usually wants to do is to "encourage" people to eat a healthy meal and then use that as an excuse to set up yet another federally funded agency, stuffed with administrators who are friends/supporters of one of the parties or the President, that gives away several hundred million dollars of other people's tax money.Grizalltheway wrote:
And yet Michelle Obama gets blasted by the Tman's of the world for encouraging (not requiring) children to eat more healthily.![]()
Hello.![]()
Think of all the money poor people can save on sodas. Tap water is, for the most part, relatively cheap...and unless you live near a freaking fracking place, it is generally healthier than sodas.
$5.8 trillion in 10 years
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: $5.8 trillion in 10 years
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: $5.8 trillion in 10 years
Reducing childhood obesity is WAY down the list of reasons as to why M.O. is a fascist control freak.Grizalltheway wrote:AFAIK, this hasn't been the case with MO's initiative. But again, conks still label her as fascist control freak for trying to reduce childhood obesity.Cluck U wrote:
Hey, if the government wants to encourage people to eat a healthy meal, yee-ha! But what the government usually wants to do is to "encourage" people to eat a healthy meal and then use that as an excuse to set up yet another federally funded agency, stuffed with administrators who are friends/supporters of one of the parties or the President, that gives away several hundred million dollars of other people's tax money.![]()
Hello.![]()
Think of all the money poor people can save on sodas. Tap water is, for the most part, relatively cheap...and unless you live near a freaking fracking place, it is generally healthier than sodas.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: $5.8 trillion in 10 years
Okay. You'd still tap that ass.AZGrizFan wrote:Reducing childhood obesity is WAY down the list of reasons as to why M.O. is a fascist control freak.Grizalltheway wrote:
AFAIK, this hasn't been the case with MO's initiative. But again, conks still label her as fascist control freak for trying to reduce childhood obesity.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: $5.8 trillion in 10 years
Grizalltheway wrote:Okay. You'd still tap that ass.AZGrizFan wrote:
Reducing childhood obesity is WAY down the list of reasons as to why M.O. is a fascist control freak.![]()
![]()
In a "grudge-fuck, control freak" kind of way.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: $5.8 trillion in 10 years
No new bureaucracy but she's using existing ones and the money they control to add more red tape and regulations so it's only shitty instead of being really shitty.Grizalltheway wrote:AFAIK, this hasn't been the case with MO's initiative. But again, conks still label her as fascist control freak for trying to reduce childhood obesity.Cluck U wrote:
Hey, if the government wants to encourage people to eat a healthy meal, yee-ha! But what the government usually wants to do is to "encourage" people to eat a healthy meal and then use that as an excuse to set up yet another federally funded agency, stuffed with administrators who are friends/supporters of one of the parties or the President, that gives away several hundred million dollars of other people's tax money.![]()
Hello.![]()
Think of all the money poor people can save on sodas. Tap water is, for the most part, relatively cheap...and unless you live near a freaking fracking place, it is generally healthier than sodas.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire