Google Busted

[Chizzang]

the Republican hand wringing over Google is delicious sauce...



So you're saying people can be influenced by discrete malicious factors..?
Information we already know about Russia and Facebook and manipulating information in key states
No big deal - didn't really happen

but Google manipulating data - that's a real problem



Too hilarious

[Pwns]

the Republican hand wringing over Google is delicious sauce...



So you're saying people can be influenced by discrete malicious factors..?
Information we already know about Russia and Facebook and manipulating information in key states
No big deal - didn't really happen

but Google manipulating data - that's a real problem



Too hilarious

That's two whopper false equivalences in this thread, Chizz.



Unless you're going to try and tell me there's no difference in being able to create fake Twitter accounts and actually controlling what search results and Youtube videos people will see.

[Skjellyfetti]

The guy from the email wasn't suggesting removing the videos or preventing people from viewing them. It was to remove them from "suggested" videos... videos they're recommending you watch.

[UNI88]

the Republican hand wringing over Google is delicious sauce...



So you're saying people can be influenced by discrete malicious factors..?
Information we already know about Russia and Facebook and manipulating information in key states
No big deal - didn't really happen

but Google manipulating data - that's a real problem



Too hilarious

That's two whopper false equivalences in this thread, Chizz.



Unless you're going to try and tell me there's no difference in being able to create fake Twitter accounts and actually controlling what search results and Youtube videos people will see.

What about the hypocrisy of complaining about Google and giving Comcast, etc. a free pass with gutting net neutrality? I can use other search engines, I might not have other options for internet providers. Is it ok because their politics are righteous or because they make generous contributions to politicians?

[Chizzang]

the Republican hand wringing over Google is delicious sauce...



So you're saying people can be influenced by discrete malicious factors..?
Information we already know about Russia and Facebook and manipulating information in key states
No big deal - didn't really happen

but Google manipulating data - that's a real problem



Too hilarious

That's two whopper false equivalences in this thread, Chizz.



Unless you're going to try and tell me there's no difference in being able to create fake Twitter accounts and actually controlling what search results and Youtube videos people will see.

The equivalency is "information manipulation"
and choosing to believe that it matters over here but not over there

When you understand the Russian Facebook scenario beyond the Fox News interpretation
please come back - it will be an interesting conversation at that point

[Pwns]

Oh, the Ruskies had plant on the Facebook BoD or a senior programmer?

Otherwise, it is indeed false equivalence. Next.

[Chizzang]

Oh, the Ruskies had plant on the Facebook BoD or a senior programmer?

Otherwise, it is indeed false equivalence. Next.

You're just proving you don't understand
and haven't read the reports



We are talking about data manipulation effecting the outcomes of elections right..?
or are we arguing about something else..?

[Skjellyfetti]

I imagine Pwns would be pretty upset if a member of Google's BoD stumped for Hillary at the DNC convention. One might even say it would produce a bit more outrage than this email from a nobody.

[JohnStOnge]

Hey JSO....Bing it and find a source to your liking. They have documents and emails and a video.

I looked at the article. They pretty much have nothing. What they do it snip small segments of language out of context. You should not even be looking at Newsbusters. It is not a credible source. And neither is Project Veritas.

Google is simply trying to control the distribution of false information.

It is truly tragic that the conservative movement has come to this. If you want to win, you should try to win with the truth. Now we have crap like this Newsbusters thing and Project Veritas trying to win with lies and deception.

[JohnStOnge]

And that Prager U thing. I mean please.

[Pwns]

Oh, the Ruskies had plant on the Facebook BoD or a senior programmer?

Otherwise, it is indeed false equivalence. Next.

You're just proving you don't understand
and haven't read the reports



We are talking about data manipulation effecting the outcomes of elections right..?
or are we arguing about something else..?

Whatever you say, Chizz.

[Chizzang]

You're just proving you don't understand
and haven't read the reports



We are talking about data manipulation effecting the outcomes of elections right..?
or are we arguing about something else..?

Whatever you say, Chizz.

I'm trying to work with you here...

[kalm]

Hey JSO....Bing it and find a source to your liking. They have documents and emails and a video.

I looked at the article. They pretty much have nothing. What they do it snip small segments of language out of context. You should not even be looking at Newsbusters. It is not a credible source. And neither is Project Veritas.

Google is simply trying to control the distribution of false information.

It is truly tragic that the conservative movement has come to this. If you want to win, you should try to win with the truth. Now we have crap like this Newsbusters thing and Project Veritas trying to win with lies and deception.

This thread didn’t exactly go the way you wanted, did it, Pwns?

[Ibanez]

Hey JSO....Bing it and find a source to your liking. They have documents and emails and a video.

I looked at the article. They pretty much have nothing. What they do it snip small segments of language out of context. You should not even be looking at Newsbusters. It is not a credible source. And neither is Project Veritas.

Google is simply trying to control the distribution of false information.

It is truly tragic that the conservative movement has come to this. If you want to win, you should try to win with the truth. Now we have crap like this Newsbusters thing and Project Veritas trying to win with lies and deception.

Credible or not, what authority does Google have to say what I can and cannot read?

[Chizzang]

I looked at the article. They pretty much have nothing. What they do it snip small segments of language out of context. You should not even be looking at Newsbusters. It is not a credible source. And neither is Project Veritas.

Google is simply trying to control the distribution of false information.

It is truly tragic that the conservative movement has come to this. If you want to win, you should try to win with the truth. Now we have crap like this Newsbusters thing and Project Veritas trying to win with lies and deception.

Credible or not, what authority does Google have to say what I can and cannot read?

None, go to another bakery...
it's pretty simple

[CID1990]

Credible or not, what authority does Google have to say what I can and cannot read?

None, go to another bakery...
it's pretty simple

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[GannonFan]

None, go to another bakery...
it's pretty simple

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Deep State Bakery, Inc. Secret investor to pretty much every bakery in existence. It's like Tow Truck Wars, but with baked goods.

[Ibanez]

Credible or not, what authority does Google have to say what I can and cannot read?

None, go to another bakery...
it's pretty simple

yup. Choose not read it/eat there/listen/watch. Be an adult and make your own decisions.

[CID1990]

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Deep State Bakery, Inc. Secret investor to pretty much every bakery in existence. It's like Tow Truck Wars, but with baked goods.

I’m just the lone B-17, awaiting the flak that indicates that I’m over the target


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

None, go to another bakery...
it's pretty simple

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry

When we have a Federal System that encourages industry monopoly
and actively supports protectionism - you get what you get

Good luck

[CID1990]

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry

When we have a Federal System that encourages industry monopoly
and actively supports protectionism - you get what you get

Good luck

Not only is it flak, it’s diversionary flak


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

When we have a Federal System that encourages industry monopoly
and actively supports protectionism - you get what you get

Good luck

Not only is it flak, it’s diversionary flak

I can direct you to another Bakery
if you're confused

Perhaps your monopoly ISP carrier (protected from on high) can help..?

[kalm]

Not only is it flak, it’s diversionary flak

I can direct you to another Bakery
if you're confused

Perhaps your monopoly ISP carrier (protected from on high) can help..?

You would think a bunch of free market competition loving fiscal conservatives would be consistent when it come to monopolies like they are with the debt.

[UNI88]

None, go to another bakery...
it's pretty simple

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, Google has 90+% of the search engine market but there are alternatives and it isn't difficult to use them. You just type in a Bing, Yahoo or something else and off you go. It's easier than finding a different, more agreeable baker.

And I still get a chuckle out of all the hypocritical politicians b!tching about Google controlling content (after they gutted net neutrality) or being a monopoly (while advocating for big government monopoly and failing to understand that in the technology industry, dominant firms rise and fade - IBM, Microsoft, Apple, etc.).

[Chizzang]

I didn’t realize we had a monopolistic bakery that controls 90% of the baking industry

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, Google has 90+% of the search engine market but there are alternatives and it isn't difficult to use them. You just type in a Bing, Yahoo or something else and off you go. It's easier than finding a different, more agreeable baker.

And I still get a chuckle out of all the hypocritical politicians b!tching about Google controlling content (after they gutted net neutrality) or being a monopoly (while advocating for big government monopoly and failing to understand that in the technology industry, dominant firms rise and fade - IBM, Microsoft, Apple, etc.).

This ^ a thousand times This...