Kamala Harris gaffe and verbal bungles watch

[BDKJMU]

More deep thoughts by Harris:

[SeattleGriz]

Gotta start her out slowly with only one sound bite. Let her work her way up to two, like Hillary. (It's a constitutional crisis and it's a threat to our democracy).

[houndawg]

first female President: Liz Cheney running as an Independent after being primaried.

[BDKJMU]

first female President: Liz Cheney running as an Independent after being primaried.

ZERO chance of that phony neocon becoming POTUS.

[houndawg]

first female President: Liz Cheney running as an Independent after being primaried.

ZERO chance of that phony neocon becoming POTUS.

Never say never

[GannonFan]

ZERO chance of that phony neocon becoming POTUS.

Never say never

The GOP will never run her as a candidate. Is she going to run as a Democrat?

[Winterborn]

Never say never

The GOP will never run her as a candidate. Is she going to run as a Democrat?

Would be one of the few times in her career that she is honest if she did.

[houndawg]

Never say never

The GOP will never run her as a candidate. Is she going to run as a Democrat?

Independent I would think



Cheney/Sanders '24

[GannonFan]

The GOP will never run her as a candidate. Is she going to run as a Democrat?

Independent I would think



Cheney/Sanders '24

The chances of an independent winning a Presidential election are zero, plus or minus zero.

[SDHornet]

[SeattleGriz]

Fire sale! Photo with Kamala reduced from 15k down to bargain basement 5k.

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

[GannonFan]

I don't understand how she can't get better speech writers. She's not the first politician who sucks at speaking extemporaneously, and she herself may not be filled with lots of great ideas, so that's why it's perplexing that she just doesn't have a better support team to just tell her what to say. In this modern age of politics, she should fit the mold of a winning candidate, she just needs better material to read off of in situations like this. She should be an ideal paper candidate but her team just sucks as well.

[BDKJMU]

I don't understand how she can't get better speech writers. She's not the first politician who sucks at speaking extemporaneously, and she herself may not be filled with lots of great ideas, so that's why it's perplexing that she just doesn't have a better support team to just tell her what to say. In this modern age of politics, she should fit the mold of a winning candidate, she just needs better material to read off of in situations like this. She should be an ideal paper candidate but her team just sucks as well.

That wouldn't solve her problem of when there's no teleprompter, in which case she just repeats the same flowery phrase or 2 word salad over and over, as evidenced by numerous clips in this thread.

I don't think its her team's fault. She got to the top despite little talent, because of identity politics (female, minority) + willing to spread her legs. Her team has had a bunch of turnover since 2020. That tells you the problem isn't the coaches, but the player. You could have the greatest coaches out there, but if the player lacks talent, there's only so much they can do.

[SeattleGriz]

I don't understand how she can't get better speech writers. She's not the first politician who sucks at speaking extemporaneously, and she herself may not be filled with lots of great ideas, so that's why it's perplexing that she just doesn't have a better support team to just tell her what to say. In this modern age of politics, she should fit the mold of a winning candidate, she just needs better material to read off of in situations like this. She should be an ideal paper candidate but her team just sucks as well.

I remember reading that she's unwilling to prepare. You can have the best writers, but if you're unwilling to put in any effort, the great writing doesn't matter.

I see it all the time at work. Someone is hosting a meeting, but doesn't come with either an agenda or a plan.

[Winterborn]

I don't understand how she can't get better speech writers. She's not the first politician who sucks at speaking extemporaneously, and she herself may not be filled with lots of great ideas, so that's why it's perplexing that she just doesn't have a better support team to just tell her what to say. In this modern age of politics, she should fit the mold of a winning candidate, she just needs better material to read off of in situations like this. She should be an ideal paper candidate but her team just sucks as well.

It is pretty simple. Would you work for an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park?

The position of speech writer for VP is prestigious and people will put up with quite a bit for that title. When they do not, one has to ask why. Somethings are just not worth the money/title they come with.

[UNI88]

I don't understand how she can't get better speech writers. She's not the first politician who sucks at speaking extemporaneously, and she herself may not be filled with lots of great ideas, so that's why it's perplexing that she just doesn't have a better support team to just tell her what to say. In this modern age of politics, she should fit the mold of a winning candidate, she just needs better material to read off of in situations like this. She should be an ideal paper candidate but her team just sucks as well.

It is pretty simple. Would you work for an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park?

The position of speech writer for VP is prestigious and people will put up with quite a bit for that title. When they do not, one has to ask why. Somethings are just not worth the money/title they come with.

Are we still talking about Harris or did we switch to trump?

[BDKJMU]

It is pretty simple. Would you work for an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park?

The position of speech writer for VP is prestigious and people will put up with quite a bit for that title. When they do not, one has to ask why. Somethings are just not worth the money/title they come with.

Are we still talking about Harris or did we switch to trump?

There you go again “But Trump!”

[UNI88]

Are we still talking about Harris or did we switch to trump?

There you go again “But Trump!”

He is "an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park." Prove me wrong.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

[AZGrizFan]

There you go again “But Trump!”

He is "an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park." Prove me wrong.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

Isn’t there a thread just like this dedicated to him?

[BDKJMU]

There you go again “But Trump!”

He is "an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park." Prove me wrong.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

But Trump!

[UNI88]

He is "an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park." Prove me wrong.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

Isn’t there a thread just like this dedicated to him?

There is. So what? I like to point out the irony of Conks criticizing Donk politicians for inept leadership, lying, etc. just like I pointed out the irony of Donks during trump's presidency. It's my shtick.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

He is "an egotistical b&$ch that treats their staff like something you would scrape off of your shoe after visiting the dog park." Prove me wrong.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

I got nothing!

FYP

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

I got nothing!

All I got is ‘But Trump!’

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

FYP.