HI54UNI wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
In general districts with larger tax bases are going to have better-funded schools, are they not?
That may or may not be true, depending on the state. Many states have school equity laws to equalize funding for "rich" and "poor" districts.
Don't pay attention to GrizHalfwit and kalm...they know only what they want to know.
And, just to expand everyone's knowledge...there are a growing number of idiots in Delaware that are
demanding that equality necessitates that
MORE money per student go towards the Black (of course, they say poor schools instead of Black schools) schools than the White schools and that White schools should be forced to do more with less money than Black schools. When questioned about the rational, the supporters immediately, despite their insistence that it is an economic model, say that you are a racist if you disagree.
So yeah...they want suburban taxpayers to actually vote to fund inner city schools with more money per student than they are taxed for their own suburban students...in the name of equality.
Yeah, in other words...support dumb fvcks who pop out kids and ignore them in order to get extra welfare benefits...and deny your own children, who you are home raising, and working a job to do that, so that the inner city kid, whose parents are absent and don't pay taxes, can compete with your kid.
JFC...and there are some dumb shits, besides the minorities that want that money...who are mostly lonely, ugly, White, and sometimes gay (so they don't have kids, but feel the sting of rejection), that vote to support that fvcked up idea of equality.
But, of course, the peeps in Montana chime in and say that stuff is not possible.
