More often, the game of Monopoly ends in a boring draw, with players holding widely scattered properties, a modest amount of cash, and being too pussyfied to engage in the aggressive property trades that would produce a clear winner.kalm wrote:Of course i replied to it. I find it interesting (as I mentioned)CID1990 wrote:
I hadn't given it much thought -
but now that you ask, I do see similarities... both must by design devolve into authoritarianism - both have government in control of industry, which inevitably leads to one or two people in complete control
but I was actually reveling in thinking, "I bet klam will be the first to pounce on this" and boy did you deliver
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And I also acknowledged similarities too. Without the right checks and balances (co-equal branches, representative democracy, etc) both CAN devolve into authoritarianism. I’m not sure that they must.
And capitalism can do the same without some regulation. Finish a game of monopoly and see how many winners you have.
In other words, kind of like the mixed economy we have now.










