Climate Change Defamation

[kalm]

Say it isn't so! Dipshit fraudsters have to drop the worst climate models because they were bullshit. Hopefully this puts an end to the idiot climate grifters making stupid catastrophic claims and screwing businesses over to meet "implausible" goals.

For those struggling with what that means, if you were peddling climate change doom, you look like a doofus who doesn't understand science.


https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rc ... ially-dead

The international committee responsible for the official scenarios that feed into climate modeling that are the basis for most projective climate research and the assessments of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the next generation of climate scenarios.

Big news: The new framework has eliminated the most extreme scenarios that have dominated climate research over much of the past several decades — specifically, RCP8.5, SSP5-8.5, and SSP3-7.0. This is an absolutely huge development in climate science which will have lasting impacts across research and policy.

“For the 21st century, this range will be smaller than assessed before: on the high-end of the range, the CMIP6 high emission levels (quantified by SSP5-8.5) have become implausible, based on trends in the costs of renewables, the emergence of climate policy and recent emission trends.”

Wait! You mean they’ve adjusted their predictions based on new observable data?

Like science is supposed to do?!?

Those dirty bastards..

[SeattleGriz]

Say it isn't so! Dipshit fraudsters have to drop the worst climate models because they were bullshit. Hopefully this puts an end to the idiot climate grifters making stupid catastrophic claims and screwing businesses over to meet "implausible" goals.

For those struggling with what that means, if you were peddling climate change doom, you look like a doofus who doesn't understand science.


https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/rc ... ially-dead

Wait! You mean they’ve adjusted their predictions based on new observable data?

Like science is supposed to do?!?

Those dirty bastards..

Only you could say that with a straight face. Data Scientists, Climatologist, Physicists, etc. have been telling everyone about how bad the models were YEARS ago, and proving it with data, but you said everyone was a crackpot and now you're trying to act like this was the plan all along? You belonged to a cult and didn't know any better.

How much economic damage was done during those 10+ years? How much stifling of innovation? How many jobs lost?

[kalm]

Wait! You mean they’ve adjusted their predictions based on new observable data?

Like science is supposed to do?!?

Those dirty bastards..

Only you could say that with a straight face. Data Scientists, Climatologist, Physicists, etc. have been telling everyone about how bad the models were YEARS ago, and proving it with data, but you said everyone was a crackpot and now you're trying to act like this was the plan all along? You belonged to a cult and didn't know any better.

How much economic damage was done during those 10+ years? How much stifling of innovation? How many jobs lost?

You’re so lost here as always. I first heard about this a short while back from your bestie, Michael Mann.

What economic damage? The extractors and fossil fuel industry seem none for the worse. And this doesn’t negate the continuing threats of climate change. Just ask the Chinese. You want to talk about economic damage? Wait until we’re still stuck in 120 year old tecnomogyvwhilevggey become the world’s top producer of automobiles and green energy. Courtesy of the fossil fuel paid contrarians whose balls you continue to fondle.

[SeattleGriz]

Only you could say that with a straight face. Data Scientists, Climatologist, Physicists, etc. have been telling everyone about how bad the models were YEARS ago, and proving it with data, but you said everyone was a crackpot and now you're trying to act like this was the plan all along? You belonged to a cult and didn't know any better.

How much economic damage was done during those 10+ years? How much stifling of innovation? How many jobs lost?

You’re so lost here as always. I first heard about this a short while back from your bestie, Michael Mann.

What economic damage? The extractors and fossil fuel industry seem none for the worse. And this doesn’t negate the continuing threats of climate change. Just ask the Chinese. You want to talk about economic damage? Wait until we’re still stuck in 120 year old tecnomogyvwhilevggey become the world’s top producer of automobiles and green energy. Courtesy of the fossil fuel paid contrarians whose balls you continue to fondle.

Are you serious? You've been defending this shit science for 15+ years calling people idiots. Guess we definitively now know who that is.

Michael Mann. The guy who just got his ass handed to him in court for lying to them? Great hero. Climategate wanker. Classic.

Quick recap of a very small portion of your unmoored and incorrect predictive track record:

Climate Change
Covington Catholic
Thomas Sowell is stoopid and you are smarter
Hunter Biden PC Tech guy
Russia Collusion
You're not gay