Trump's Secret Documents. The World awaits.

[AZGrizFan]

Same thing Hillary was going to do with the 33,000 emails she deleted and the hard drives she had destroyed when found out?

Tommy, I love the fact that you proclaim to be free thinker but think that a FPOTUS keeping over 100 Classified docs, in hand; some with the highest classification we have, is the same as a FSOS having 3 classified docs on a compromised server.

How do we know how many she had? She deleted 33,000 emails and destroyed the hard drives.

[houndawg]

Tommy, I love the fact that you proclaim to be free thinker but think that a FPOTUS keeping over 100 Classified docs, in hand; some with the highest classification we have, is the same as a FSOS having 3 classified docs on a compromised server.

How do we know how many she had? She deleted 33,000 emails and destroyed the hard drives.

Z

[AZGrizFan]

How do we know how many she had? She deleted 33,000 emails and destroyed the hard drives.

Z

I know, I know. To quote a known crook, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

[houndawg]

Same thing Hillary was going to do with the 33,000 emails she deleted and the hard drives she had destroyed when found out?

Tommy, I love the fact that you proclaim to be free thinker but think that a FPOTUS and career con man keeping over 100 Classified docs, in hand; some with the highest classification we have, is the same as a FSOS having 3 classified docs on a compromised server.

[houndawg]

Z

I know, I know. To quote a known crook, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

it stopped mattering when you changed the subject to number of documents.....pretty feeble deflection, even for you

[kalm]

Tommy, I love the fact that you proclaim to be free thinker but think that a FPOTUS keeping over 100 Classified docs, in hand; some with the highest classification we have, is the same as a FSOS having 3 classified docs on a compromised server.

How do we know how many she had? She deleted 33,000 emails and destroyed the hard drives.

The Trump DOJ really dropped the ball on that one.

[AZGrizFan]

How do we know how many she had? She deleted 33,000 emails and destroyed the hard drives.

The Trump DOJ really dropped the ball on that one.

Agreed.

[AZGrizFan]

I know, I know. To quote a known crook, “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

it stopped mattering when you changed the subject to number of documents.....pretty feeble deflection, even for you

Well, one has to wonder, why delete them and destroy hard drives if there was nothing incriminating on them?

[houndawg]

it stopped mattering when you changed the subject to number of documents.....pretty feeble deflection, even for you

Well, one has to wonder, why delete them and destroy hard drives if there was nothing incriminating on them?

Thats a good point - why don't you start a thread about it instead trying the "what about" hijack?

[houndawg]

How do we know how many she had? She deleted 33,000 emails and destroyed the hard drives.

The Trump DOJ really dropped the ball on that one.

Ouch!

Z? You OK bro?

[AZGrizFan]

The Trump DOJ really dropped the ball on that one.

Ouch!

Z? You OK bro?

I’m fine. I agree with him. See, it’s possible to not see everything through your partisan blinders.

[houndawg]

it stopped mattering when you changed the subject to number of documents.....pretty feeble deflection, even for you

Well, one has to wonder, why delete them and destroy hard drives if there was nothing incriminating on them?

I agree. She could have made some serious bank - no wonder conks think she's stupid... the Saudis would have coughed up BIG for good stuff, oh, wait.....they DID cough up big for the good stuff

[SeattleGriz]

Trump has this huge RICO lawsuit against Hillary and a slew of FBI guys. It's been proceeding along quite well, but could still never make it to an actual court case. Anyway, the raid just so happens to correlate with his latest filings. Could easily be coincidence, or it could also be the government trying to tie up some of his documents due to "active investigation". He had a whole binder of documents he wanted declassified so everyone could see a little more in depth what Hillary and the FBI were up to.

I didn't understand this post at the time and I don't now. Please look at the link below and let me know how it is relatable.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/09/trump-l ... issed.html

A federal judge dismissed former President Donald Trump’s sprawling lawsuit alleging Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee and many others conspired to spread a false narrative of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential election.

In a searing order Thursday, Judge Donald Middlebrooks said that Trump’s lawsuit was merely “seeking to flaunt a two-hundred-page political manifesto outlining his grievances against those that have opposed him.”

The former president’s claims “are not only unsupported by any legal authority but plainly foreclosed by binding precedent,” Middlebrooks wrote in U.S. District Court in southern Florida.

Same court case.

The timing of the DOJ/FBI urgency into Trump coincided with the movements of the court case. Could easily be coincidence, but made people speculate the documents relate to that case.

I don't know if the judge dropping the case is the end of that avenue.

Anyway, the main question is, how is Trump going to make these documents visible?

[bobbythekidd]

I didn't understand this post at the time and I don't now. Please look at the link below and let me know how it is relatable.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/09/trump-l ... issed.html

Same court case.

The timing of the DOJ/FBI urgency into Trump coincided with the movements of the court case. Could easily be coincidence, but made people speculate the documents relate to that case.

I don't know if the judge dropping the case is the end of that avenue.

Anyway, the main question is, how is Trump going to make these documents visible?

Ah. Same case. thank you

[houndawg]

I didn't understand this post at the time and I don't now. Please look at the link below and let me know how it is relatable.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/09/trump-l ... issed.html

Same court case.

The timing of the DOJ/FBI urgency into Trump coincided with the movements of the court case. Could easily be coincidence, but made people speculate the documents relate to that case.

I don't know if the judge dropping the case is the end of that avenue.

Anyway, the main question is, how is Trump going to make these documents visible?

The Saudis didn't cough up $2,000,000,000 to his family for nothing.

[houndawg]

I didn't understand this post at the time and I don't now. Please look at the link below and let me know how it is relatable.

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/09/trump-l ... issed.html

Same court case.

The timing of the DOJ/FBI urgency into Trump coincided with the movements of the court case. Could easily be coincidence, but made people speculate the documents relate to that case.

I don't know if the judge dropping the case is the end of that avenue.

Anyway, the main question is, how is Trump going to make these documents visible?

..a masterpiece of understatement

[BDKJMU]

Interesting take on this.
DOJ Goes Down to Defeat as Trump Gets Big Win in Special Master Case
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/09 ... se-n628069

[UNI88]

Interesting take on this.
DOJ Goes Down to Defeat as Trump Gets Big Win in Special Master Case
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/09 ... se-n628069

I would think it would be harmful to trump's case to argue that there are documents allegedly "classified" so sensitive that they shouldn't be turned over to the special master. If they're that sensitive they shouldn't have been lying around MAL.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Interesting take on this.
DOJ Goes Down to Defeat as Trump Gets Big Win in Special Master Case
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/09 ... se-n628069

Sounds like this will hold up for sure.

[SeattleGriz]

Interesting take on this.
DOJ Goes Down to Defeat as Trump Gets Big Win in Special Master Case
https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2022/09 ... se-n628069

I would think it would be harmful to trump's case to argue that there are documents allegedly "classified" so sensitive that they shouldn't be turned over to the special master. If they're that sensitive they shouldn't have been lying around MAL.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

The DOJ-NSD is actually trying to say they are above the President by making that claim. Their claim was actually "even IF the documents were declassified, we get to choose who sees them.". Talk about weasel words. Even if...

This is the judge the FBI put a faulty FISA application in front of to get him to sign off on Carter Page.

Hopefully the judge remembers that.

[kalm]

I would think it would be harmful to trump's case to argue that there are documents allegedly "classified" so sensitive that they shouldn't be turned over to the special master. If they're that sensitive they shouldn't have been lying around MAL.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

The DOJ-NSD is actually trying to say they are above the President by making that claim. Their claim was actually "even IF the documents were declassified, we get to choose who sees them.". Talk about weasel words. Even if...

This is the judge the FBI put a faulty FISA application in front of to get him to sign off on Carter Page.

Hopefully the judge remembers that.

The judge admitted in her ruling that Trump is above the law in regards to this. He’s not.

[kalm]

Judge Cannon:

“There has been no actual suggestion by the Government of any identifiable emergency or imminent disclosure of classified information arising from Plaintiff’s allegedly unlawful retention of the seized property.”

But we need a special master to ignore the classified documents that were declassified. Will take a couple of months….

[SeattleGriz]

The DOJ-NSD is actually trying to say they are above the President by making that claim. Their claim was actually "even IF the documents were declassified, we get to choose who sees them.". Talk about weasel words. Even if...

This is the judge the FBI put a faulty FISA application in front of to get him to sign off on Carter Page.

Hopefully the judge remembers that.

The judge admitted in her ruling that Trump is above the law in regards to this. He’s not.

In regards to these documents, how is Trump not above the DOJ-NSD? Do tell!

What do you think the documents are?

[UNI88]

I would think it would be harmful to trump's case to argue that there are documents allegedly "classified" so sensitive that they shouldn't be turned over to the special master. If they're that sensitive they shouldn't have been lying around MAL.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

The DOJ-NSD is actually trying to say they are above the President by making that claim. Their claim was actually "even IF the documents were declassified, we get to choose who sees them.". Talk about weasel words. Even if...

This is the judge the FBI put a faulty FISA application in front of to get him to sign off on Carter Page.

Hopefully the judge remembers that.

It's the trump camp making the claim that the documents shouldn't be seen by the Special Masterbater not the DoJ.

[UNI88]

The judge admitted in her ruling that Trump is above the law in regards to this. He’s not.

In regards to these documents, how is Trump not above the DOJ-NSD? Do tell!

What do you think the documents are?

trump was no longer above the DoJ-NSD on January 20, 2021.