Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

houndawg wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Here we go-

AOC's bullsh1t is OK because she's righteous

She's a Trump figure and she's going to get exactly the same pass from her base that Trump gets from his


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There you go again -


AOC's bullshit hilarious, CID. The way she so deftly skewers pompous windbags like that tired old retread Ed Rollins is absolutely precious. You'll be a proud papa someday if your daughter grows up to have that kind of moxie.

My daughters consider numerous multiple sources and THEN also consider their own emotions before formulating political opinions

Sort of like modern day John Lockes

They are smarter than you and me put together and I am already proud of them

They are also significantly smarter than semi-autodidacts like AOC

CID1990 wrote:

houndawg wrote:
There you go again -


AOC's bullshit hilarious, CID. The way she so deftly skewers pompous windbags like that tired old retread Ed Rollins is absolutely precious. You'll be a proud papa someday if your daughter grows up to have that kind of moxie.

My daughters consider numerous multiple sources and THEN also consider their own emotions before formulating political opinions

Sort of like modern day John Lockes

They are smarter than you and me put together and I am already proud of them

They are also significantly smarter than semi-autodidacts like AOC

Ah... but have they been introduced to the system yet
The School System can turn them / mold them / shrink their minds / break their will / destroy their dreams

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
My daughters consider numerous multiple sources and THEN also consider their own emotions before formulating political opinions

Sort of like modern day John Lockes

They are smarter than you and me put together and I am already proud of them

They are also significantly smarter than semi-autodidacts like AOC

Ah... but have they been introduced to the system yet
The School System can turn them / mold them / shrink their minds / break their will / destroy their dreams

As can the legal system, local politics, life in general.

kalm wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Ah... but have they been introduced to the system yet
The School System can turn them / mold them / shrink their minds / break their will / destroy their dreams

As can the legal system, local politics, life in general.

houndawg wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
Here we go-

AOC's bullsh1t is OK because she's righteous

She's a Trump figure and she's going to get exactly the same pass from her base that Trump gets from his


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There you go again -


AOC's bullshit hilarious, CID. The way she so deftly skewers pompous windbags like that tired old retread Ed Rollins is absolutely precious. You'll be a proud papa someday if your daughter grows up to have that kind of moxie.

Houndy’s got a bad case of #SPS

Chizzang wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
My daughters consider numerous multiple sources and THEN also consider their own emotions before formulating political opinions

Sort of like modern day John Lockes

They are smarter than you and me put together and I am already proud of them

They are also significantly smarter than semi-autodidacts like AOC

Ah... but have they been introduced to the system yet
The School System can turn them / mold them / shrink their minds / break their will / destroy their dreams

There is significantly less Mickey Mouse shenanigans going on in the overseas schools


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CID1990 wrote:

Chizzang wrote:
Ah... but have they been introduced to the system yet
The School System can turn them / mold them / shrink their minds / break their will / destroy their dreams

There is significantly less Mickey Mouse shenanigans going on in the overseas schools


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I hear the same about healthcare.

Grizalltheway wrote:

kalm wrote:
As can the legal system, local politics, life in general.

kalm wrote:

Grizalltheway wrote:

That's a POTY nominee right there, GATW.

HI54UNI wrote:

Love that picture. It’s her “Marty Feldman” look.

She now has a channel of her own!

https://www.theonion.com/fox-news-debut ... e=Facebook

kalm wrote:She now has a channel of her own!

https://www.theonion.com/fox-news-debut ... e=Facebook

The Onion is usually funny

CID1990 wrote:

kalm wrote:She now has a channel of her own!

https://www.theonion.com/fox-news-debut ... e=Facebook

The Onion is usually funny

yeah. That’s way too plausible for it to be funny.

AZGrizFan wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
The Onion is usually funny

yeah. That’s way too plausible for it to be funny.

Looks like another case of AOCDS. It's reaching epidemic levels.

I love this chick!

Biggest Conk trigger since HRC.

houndawg wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
yeah. That’s way too plausible for it to be funny.

Looks like another case of AOCDS. It's reaching epidemic levels.

Says the guy with SPS.

mainejeff wrote:I love this chick!

Biggest Conk trigger since HRC.

Of course you do. Donks don’t give a shit if their politicians are certifiable retards. As long as they “trigger conks”, that’s all that matters.

AZGrizFan wrote:

mainejeff wrote:I love this chick!

Biggest Conk trigger since HRC.

Of course you do. Donks don’t give a shit if their politicians are certifiable retards. As long as they “trigger conks”, that’s all that matters.

The irony. It's too much.

mainejeff wrote:I love this chick!

Biggest Conk trigger since HRC.

I think she's very inexperienced when it comes to substance but she knows presentation. She's very effective. I would love to see Trump in a debate with her. Trump isn't capable of beating anybody on substance so she'd be OK on that front. And I think there is a good chance that she would absolutely humiliate him on the presentation front. She'd take none of his shit and she'd make him look like an old, driveling fool. Trump likes smack talk but he'd be out of his league against THAT chick.

Grizalltheway wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:
Of course you do. Donks don’t give a **** if their politicians are certifiable retards. As long as they “trigger conks”, that’s all that matters.

The irony. It's too much.

Agreed. No need to elaborate.

Just call me the JSO whisperer.

JohnStOnge wrote:

mainejeff wrote:I love this chick!

Biggest Conk trigger since HRC.

I think she's very inexperienced when it comes to substance but she knows presentation. She's very effective. I would love to see Trump in a debate with her. Trump isn't capable of beating anybody on substance so she'd be OK on that front. And I think there is a good chance that she would absolutely humiliate him on the presentation front. She'd take none of his **** and she'd make him look like an old, driveling fool. Trump likes smack talk but he'd be out of his league against THAT chick.

I’d love to see that debate but after seeing the last debates he was in, I don’t think Trump would suffer as much as you think against her

He would drop all kinds of non sequiturs and insults the way he did against the GOP and Hillary and she’d be floundering within 5 minutes

In order to stay on point against Trump in a debate you have to ignore him as if he isn’t in the room and that’s impossible - especially for a sick burnz Twitter millennial whose stock in trade on the Internet is not that far removed from Trump

She’d be screaming “racist white pig motherfvker” at him within ten minutes and getting the same reaction from her base that Trump got from his in the 2016 debates

(Which is why I would watch.... oh yes.... I’d anticipate it like the premiere of Thriller)

CID1990 wrote:

JohnStOnge wrote:
I think she's very inexperienced when it comes to substance but she knows presentation. She's very effective. I would love to see Trump in a debate with her. Trump isn't capable of beating anybody on substance so she'd be OK on that front. And I think there is a good chance that she would absolutely humiliate him on the presentation front. She'd take none of his **** and she'd make him look like an old, driveling fool. Trump likes smack talk but he'd be out of his league against THAT chick.

I’d love to see that debate but after seeing the last debates he was in, I don’t think Trump would suffer as much as you think against her

He would drop all kinds of non sequiturs and insults the way he did against the GOP and Hillary and she’d be floundering within 5 minutes

In order to stay on point against Trump in a debate you have to ignore him as if he isn’t in the room and that’s impossible - especially for a sick burnz Twitter millennial whose stock in trade on the Internet is not that far removed from Trump

She’d be screaming “racist white pig motherfvker” at him within ten minutes and getting the same reaction from her base that Trump got from his in the 2016 debates

(Which is why I would watch.... oh yes.... I’d anticipate it like the premiere of Thriller)

I don't think there's be any "stay on point" at all. I just think that it'd be a smack talk contest. He did great doing that against traditional politicians. That young woman is not a traditional politician. I think he'd find himself outmatched trying to maintain a smack talk contest against her. I think she'd smack him around pretty good.

JohnStOnge wrote:

CID1990 wrote:
I’d love to see that debate but after seeing the last debates he was in, I don’t think Trump would suffer as much as you think against her

He would drop all kinds of non sequiturs and insults the way he did against the GOP and Hillary and she’d be floundering within 5 minutes

In order to stay on point against Trump in a debate you have to ignore him as if he isn’t in the room and that’s impossible - especially for a sick burnz Twitter millennial whose stock in trade on the Internet is not that far removed from Trump

She’d be screaming “racist white pig motherfvker” at him within ten minutes and getting the same reaction from her base that Trump got from his in the 2016 debates

(Which is why I would watch.... oh yes.... I’d anticipate it like the premiere of Thriller)

I don't think there's be any "stay on point" at all. I just think that it'd be a smack talk contest. He did great doing that against traditional politicians. That young woman is not a traditional politician. I think he'd find himself outmatched trying to maintain a smack talk contest against her. I think she'd smack him around pretty good.

And therefore she would win with her base, and he’d win with his base

And how is she not the lefty Trump?