2020 General Election

[UNI88]

Out of date would be incorrect...

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Trump won't admit his mistakes ...

[AZGrizFan]

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Trump won't admit his mistakes ...

it was huuuuuge. Perfect in every way. Best we've ever seen.

[Winterborn]

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Politicians don't admit mistakes ...

FYP

[Ibanez]

Trump won't admit his mistakes ...

it was huuuuuge. Perfect in every way. Best we've ever seen.

[SeattleGriz]

Oh.

No! They over sold the "insurrection"?

My favorite was when they were trying to hold a 60 year old guy without bail because he was supposedly referred to as the Rapid Deployment Force by his group of friends...only to then have it exposed through his communications it was a joke. The guy was never at the Capitol, had a bad knee, was in terrible shape and was the only one labeled Rapid Deployment Force.

When his friends were interviewed, they confirmed it was a joke. Much like calling a fat guy, "slim".

I don't think this charade will have enough gas to make it to the 2022 elections like they had hoped.

[BDKJMU]

Out of date would be incorrect...

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Wrong. Because wiki presents as current. It didn't state "as of 2012". It just stated. Out of date is still not correct. Therefore if wiki is not correct, wiki is incorrect, therefore I am right, therefore you are wrong. Maybe someday you'll be man enough to admit it.

[BDKJMU]

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Trump won't admit his mistakes ...

Neither will Biden

[Ibanez]

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Wrong. Because wiki presents as current. It didn't state "as of 2012". It just stated. Out of date is still not correct. Therefore if wiki is not correct, wiki is incorrect, therefore I am right, therefore you are wrong. Maybe someday you'll be man enough to admit it.

If wiki is incorrect, and you use their data...you're still wrong. I'm not sure how you can think otherwise.

Hubris is a bitch....

[Ibanez]

Trump won't admit his mistakes ...

Neither will Biden

BUT BIDEN!


JFC...

[UNI88]

Neither will Biden

BUT BIDEN!


JFC...

Exactly. This discussion was about Trump, no more need to bring Biden into it than there was to bring Trump into discussions about Cuomo's sexual assaults.

[UNI88]

You using 2012 data in 2021 would be incorrect. It's ok to be wrong. You just have to be a man and admit a mistake. We all make mistakes.

It takes a man to admit his mistakes.

Wrong. Because wiki presents as current. It didn't state "as of 2012". It just stated. Out of date is still not correct. Therefore if wiki is not correct, wiki is incorrect, therefore I am right, therefore you are wrong. Maybe someday you'll be man enough to admit it.

[UNI88]

it was huuuuuge. Perfect in every way. Best we've ever seen.

Quality post AZ!

[AZGrizFan]

Quality post AZ!

fantastic....really, really great.

[Ibanez]

Quality post AZ!

fantastic....really, really great.

Superb.

[Winterborn]

You guys can argue Trump/Biden/Politicans all you want. So many possibilities open up in with that picture and inquiring minds want to know.......

[BDKJMU]

Wrong. Because wiki presents as current. It didn't state "as of 2012". It just stated. Out of date is still not correct. Therefore if wiki is not correct, wiki is incorrect, therefore I am right, therefore you are wrong. Maybe someday you'll be man enough to admit it.

If wiki is incorrect, and you use their data...you're still wrong. I'm not sure how you can think otherwise.

Hubris is a bitch....

I said "according to wiki". So I am not wrong. Because "according to wiki" is correct..

[UNI88]

You guys can argue Trump/Biden/Politicans all you want. So many possibilities open up in with that picture and inquiring minds want to know.......

Let them argue. I'm just going to stare at that photo for a little while and let my mind wander.

[Ibanez]

If wiki is incorrect, and you use their data...you're still wrong. I'm not sure how you can think otherwise.

Hubris is a bitch....

I said "according to wiki". So I am not wrong. Because "according to wiki" is correct..

So using old data is ok as long as you pass the buck.

[kalm]

You guys can argue Trump/Biden/Politicans all you want. So many possibilities open up in with that picture and inquiring minds want to know.......

Let them argue. I'm just going to stare at that photo for a little while and let my mind wander.

It’s a very intriguing pic for sure. No argument here.

[HI54UNI]

Now Who’s Contesting Elections?
The Democratic House could overturn results in Iowa and New York.

Iowa’s state elections board on Monday certified Republican Mariannette Miller-Meeks’s victory in the 2nd district, flipping a seat currently held by a Democrat. But her opponent, Rita Hart, is dusting off a 1969 federal statute to have the House of Representatives pick the winner. That means Democrats in Washington could overrule Iowa voters to seat a co-partisan and grow their majority.

Queen Nancy saw the polling showing the steal wasn't popular so Demorat Rita Hart got her marching orders and withdrew her protest yesterday. MMM will stay as the rep in the 2nd district.

[SDHornet]

Here you go JSO:

Donald Trump's share of the Latino vote surged to nearly 33% in 2020 election - a sharp increase from 2016 when he won just 18%, study finds
Donald Trump received unexpectedly high Latino support in 2020 elections
Analysis shows sharp spike in Latino votes for ex-president this past November
In 2016, Trump received just 18% of Latino vote in his victory over Hillary Clinton
But in 2020, Trump saw his share of Latino vote jump to nearly 33%
Ex-president saw most significant Latino gains in Miami-Dade County, Florida
Trump saw surge in Latino support in Maricopa County, Arizona, and Milwaukee
Growing number of Latino voters said economy was most important factor
November 3 election saw record high Latino turnout of 17 million voters

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ction.html

[AZGrizFan]

Here you go JSO:

Donald Trump's share of the Latino vote surged to nearly 33% in 2020 election - a sharp increase from 2016 when he won just 18%, study finds
Donald Trump received unexpectedly high Latino support in 2020 elections
Analysis shows sharp spike in Latino votes for ex-president this past November
In 2016, Trump received just 18% of Latino vote in his victory over Hillary Clinton
But in 2020, Trump saw his share of Latino vote jump to nearly 33%
Ex-president saw most significant Latino gains in Miami-Dade County, Florida
Trump saw surge in Latino support in Maricopa County, Arizona, and Milwaukee
Growing number of Latino voters said economy was most important factor
November 3 election saw record high Latino turnout of 17 million voters

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ction.html

The texas border counties were significantly higher Trump supporters than in ‘16. Several turned red even.

[SeattleGriz]

Now that Arizona has an actual forensic audit set up, the election board is denying them the ability to perform the audit in the location where the ballots are stored.

They sure have fought this whole process tooth and nail. You'd think they would welcome a forensic audit with open arms.

[kalm]

Now that Arizona has an actual forensic audit set up, the election board is denying them the ability to perform the audit in the location where the ballots are stored.

They sure have fought this whole process tooth and nail. You'd think they would welcome a forensic audit with open arms.

Took them long enough. Wonder if they’ll audit all the races?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.azcent ... 6970122002

[Ibanez]

Now that Arizona has an actual forensic audit set up, the election board is denying them the ability to perform the audit in the location where the ballots are stored.

They sure have fought this whole process tooth and nail. You'd think they would welcome a forensic audit with open arms.

Took them long enough. Wonder if they’ll audit all the races?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.azcent ... 6970122002

Meanwhile, here in Arizona, Fann says she’s not out to overturn the election but merely wants to restore voters’ confidence, never acknowledging her own role in undermining that confidence by insisting on a recount despite any evidence of fraud.


She’s talking about bringing in volunteers to do the counting to save money though she’s steamed that the Democrats have no interest in making this a bipartisan affair.

“It’s too bad the Democratic Party doesn’t believe in getting answers for our constituents,” she told Fischer on Monday. “I think that’s our job.”

Perhaps it’s because the Democrats, along with the Republican-run county Board of Supervisors, are satisfied with the answers they got after pre- and post-election testing showed the machinery delivered an accurate result.

Or perhaps it’s because they’re satisfied with the answers they got when the sample audit required by state law showed a 100% match between the hand and machine counts.

Or perhaps it’s because they’re satisfied with the county’s two independent audits of the Dominion Voting Systems tabulation equipment that turned up no evidence of a problem.

This is about integrity...this time we'll find the fraud!