New York files suit against President Trump, alleging his charity engaged in ‘illegal conduct’

[Ivytalk]

BTW I just took the test at https://www.politicalcompass.org/test and this is how I turned out:



I don't think there's any question that if you look at my positions on various issues I would fall into what we call the "conservative" category.

But that doesn't mean I'm not going to call "conservatives" out when they do something like rally behind an atrocity like Donald Trump. You have to be willing to criticize your own "side" when your own "side' is wrong.

I was center-right.

Spoiler: show

In the left-libertarian box.

So let me get this straight: you got trolled by the response to a troll.

[kalm]

I was center-right.

Spoiler: show

In the left-libertarian box.

So let me get this straight: you got trolled by the response to a troll.

This just shows I’m stronger on the freedom spectrum than JSO. Probably you as well.

[Ivytalk]

So let me get this straight: you got trolled by the response to a troll.

This just shows I’m stronger on the freedom spectrum than JSO. Probably you as well.

Must not yield to temptation to take test! Must...not...yield...!

[CAA Flagship]

This just shows I’m stronger on the freedom spectrum than JSO. Probably you as well.

Must not yield to temptation to take test! Must...not...yield...!

Many questions that don't go deep enough.

Then there is this one:
The only social responsibility of a company should be to deliver a profit to its shareholders.

Is that what you would define as a "social responsibility"?


I'm at +1.25, +0.72. Nearly center cup.

[93henfan]

In the left-libertarian box.

My nigga. This survey obviously didn't get much into guns or immigration. It seemed to focus mostly on corporate responsibility, of which I am an advocate. I guess that makes me a lefty.

[Vidav]

In the left-libertarian box.

My nigga. This survey obviously didn't get much into guns or immigration. It seemed to focus mostly on corporate responsibility, of which I am an advocate. I guess that makes me a lefty.

I ended up pretty close to there.

[Ivytalk]

Sad. Klam, Flaggy, 93, and Russian are all JSO wannabes.

[CID1990]

This test tried to quantify me once, so I ate its liver with fava beans and a nice Chianti


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[93henfan]

This test tried to quantify me once, so I ate its liver with fava beans and a nice Chianti


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You forgot:

[∞∞∞]

You're all authoritarians compared to me.

[CID1990]

You're all authoritarians compared to me.

How are you going to get all your pie in the sky ideas going without force of law, Treep?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ivytalk]

You're all authoritarians compared to me.

How are you going to get all your pie in the sky ideas going without force of law, Treep?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where’s the “anarchist” quadrant?

“We’re an anarcho-syndicalist commune!”

[BDKJMU]

GD double post..

[BDKJMU]

Mine:

As 93 mentioned, 2 big areas it failed to ask about, are guns and immigration. If it did, I would probably move another couple squares right, but down a little, on the libertarian side of the line, since pro gun rights/2A would swing you more libertarian. Obviously anyone who was pro illegal immigration, anti gun rights would be the opposite, moved a little further left, authoritarian

So while the result says right, sleightly authortarian, but I would say due to its flawed nature I would be right, sleightly libertarian .

[Ibanez]

Meh. Have some questions on gun rights and immigration and that goes back towards the center.

[AZGrizFan]

Shocked/not shocked

[Ivytalk]

The JSO troll-a-thon continues...

[JohnStOnge]

The JSO troll-a-thon continues...

If you are talking about you trolling me OK. But if you are talking about me I do not troll. I do not post things for the purpose of making deliberately offensive or provocative online posts with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them. I am just posting what I think and trying to provide arguments for why what I think is correct.

[CAA Flagship]

The JSO troll-a-thon continues...

If you are talking about you trolling me OK. But if you are talking about me I do not troll. I do not post things for the purpose of making deliberately offensive or provocative online posts with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them. I am just posting what I think and trying to provide arguments for why what I think is correct, OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

You forgot something ^^^

[UNI88]

If you are talking about you trolling me OK. But if you are talking about me I do not troll. I do not post things for the purpose of making deliberately offensive or provocative online posts with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them. I am just posting what I think and trying to provide arguments for why what I think is correct, OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

You forgot something ^^^

You're right he did.

[93henfan]

over and over

phpBB [video]

[Ivytalk]

over and over

phpBB [video]

God, I love this place!

No homo....

[kalm]

over and over

phpBB [video]

God, I love this place!

No homo....

The Joan Jett cover was better.

[kalm]

Mine:

As 93 mentioned, 2 big areas it failed to ask about, are guns and immigration. If it did, I would probably move another couple squares right, but down a little, on the libertarian side of the line, since pro gun rights/2A would swing you more libertarian. Obviously anyone who was pro illegal immigration, anti gun rights would be the opposite, moved a little further left, authoritarian

So while the result says right, sleightly authortarian, but I would say due to its flawed nature I would be right, sleightly libertarian .

1). No one is pro illegal immigration.

2). Stronger immigration laws and enforcement would push you further authoritarian.

3). Being a GM, attending various committee/board meetings, and observing HOA meetings has taught me that there’s something to be said for dictatorships.

[HI54UNI]

As 93 mentioned, 2 big areas it failed to ask about, are guns and immigration. If it did, I would probably move another couple squares right, but down a little, on the libertarian side of the line, since pro gun rights/2A would swing you more libertarian. Obviously anyone who was pro illegal immigration, anti gun rights would be the opposite, moved a little further left, authoritarian

So while the result says right, sleightly authortarian, but I would say due to its flawed nature I would be right, sleightly libertarian .

1). No one is pro illegal immigration.

2). Stronger immigration laws and enforcement would push you further authoritarian.

3). Being a GM, attending various committee/board meetings, and observing HOA meetings has taught me that there’s something to be said for dictatorships.

There's nothing wrong with a dictatorship as long as I'm the dictator.