The Russia Investigation Was a Total and Complete.........

[houndawg]

You know there's another thing to consider: It was an investigation into Russian efforts to influence a US election. That's what it was. One charge was to see if anybody in the Trump campaign illegally coordinated with Russians. But the point was to investigate the Russian efforts. Why would you not want the FBI to investigate that?

The first order if the Mueller’s collusion delusion investigation, to investigate:
“(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... atters.pdf

It was an attempt to bring down a duly elected sitting POTUS by a bunch of poeople who didn’t like the result.

Why is he bleating about his full exoneration while he tries to bury the report at the same time?

You'd think he would have published it immediately, especially when its short enough to be read over the weekend.

[CID1990]

The first order if the Mueller’s collusion delusion investigation, to investigate:
“(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... atters.pdf

It was an attempt to bring down a duly elected sitting POTUS by a bunch of poeople who didn’t like the result.

Why is he bleating about his full exoneration while he tries to bury the report at the same time?

You'd think he would have published it immediately, especially when its short enough to be read over the weekend.

Trump is trying to bury the report now?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[houndawg]

Why is he bleating about his full exoneration while he tries to bury the report at the same time?

You'd think he would have published it immediately, especially when its short enough to be read over the weekend.

Trump is trying to bury the report now?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's just my guess as a know-nothing outsider in flyover country about why a report that fully exonerates him isn't already public. You're the informed insider, why do you think a report that fully exonerates our so-called President hasn't already been spread around the world? It's so confusing.

[CID1990]

Trump is trying to bury the report now?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's just my guess as a know-nothing outsider in flyover country about why a report that fully exonerates him isn't already public. You're the informed insider, why do you think a report that fully exonerates our so-called President hasn't already been spread around the world? It's so confusing.

Because the President has nothing to do with its release. The DOJ needs time to redact it for all those things we were discussing before that you obviously skimmed over -

I was kind of asking you for a link but I should have known better




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

You know there's another thing to consider: It was an investigation into Russian efforts to influence a US election. That's what it was. One charge was to see if anybody in the Trump campaign illegally coordinated with Russians. But the point was to investigate the Russian efforts. Why would you not want the FBI to investigate that?

The first order if the Mueller’s collusion delusion investigation, to investigate:
“(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... atters.pdf

It was an attempt to bring down a duly elected sitting POTUS by a bunch of poeople who didn’t like the result.

1) It wasn't some partisan Democrat that began the investigation. It was a Trump appointee. It was Trumps administration.
2) Based of the FACT that we the Russians did try to influence the election and by certain actions of Trump associates, the investigation was looking to see if there was a conspiracy. Trump Tower meeting. Flynn. The supposed request by Trump that Comey go easy on Flynn. Comey's firing.
3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.
4) Trump has a history with Russia. And Putin. He's said it himself, before 2016, that he met Putin.He knew Putin. He was developing a project there. Then suddenly, he reverses himself. You of all people loved to point out Obama's flip flops and lies yet you are giving Trump a pass. Why? B/c you're biased and un-principled.

If there's a "deep state" that initiated this investigation and then has cleared him of conspiracy - what does that logically tell you?

You're so biased that you simply have no objectivity.

[houndawg]

That's just my guess as a know-nothing outsider in flyover country about why a report that fully exonerates him isn't already public. You're the informed insider, why do you think a report that fully exonerates our so-called President hasn't already been spread around the world? It's so confusing.

Because the President has nothing to do with its release. The DOJ needs time to redact it for all those things we were discussing before that you obviously skimmed over -

I was kind of asking you for a link but I should have known better

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Of course he doesn't. I'm sure Barr's son-in-law made that clear to his new boss.

[Chizzang]

1) It wasn't some partisan Democrat that began the investigation. It was a Trump appointee. It was Trumps administration.
2) Based of the FACT that we the Russians did try to influence the election and by certain actions of Trump associates, the investigation was looking to see if there was a conspiracy. Trump Tower meeting. Flynn. The supposed request by Trump that Comey go easy on Flynn. Comey's firing.
3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.
4) Trump has a history with Russia. And Putin. He's said it himself, before 2016, that he met Putin.He knew Putin. He was developing a project there. Then suddenly, he reverses himself. You of all people loved to point out Obama's flip flops and lies yet you are giving Trump a pass. Why? B/c you're biased and un-principled.

If there's a "deep state" that initiated this investigation and then has cleared him of conspiracy - what does that logically tell you?

You're so biased that you simply have no objectivity.

The investigation was obviously necessary...
only Fox News has the balls to suggest it wasn't

Half the conservative press has admitted that the Trump team desperately tried to collude
but were so incompetent they failed repeatedly

But it's easy to lose sight of the good news
that there wasn't a successful collusion pact established and we're good to move forward

[Ibanez]

1) It wasn't some partisan Democrat that began the investigation. It was a Trump appointee. It was Trumps administration.
2) Based of the FACT that we the Russians did try to influence the election and by certain actions of Trump associates, the investigation was looking to see if there was a conspiracy. Trump Tower meeting. Flynn. The supposed request by Trump that Comey go easy on Flynn. Comey's firing.
3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.
4) Trump has a history with Russia. And Putin. He's said it himself, before 2016, that he met Putin.He knew Putin. He was developing a project there. Then suddenly, he reverses himself. You of all people loved to point out Obama's flip flops and lies yet you are giving Trump a pass. Why? B/c you're biased and un-principled.

If there's a "deep state" that initiated this investigation and then has cleared him of conspiracy - what does that logically tell you?

You're so biased that you simply have no objectivity.

The investigation was obviously necessary...
only Fox News has the balls to suggest it wasn't

Half the conservative press has admitted that the Trump team desperately tried to collude
but were so incompetent they failed repeatedly

But it's easy to lose sight of the good news
that there wasn't a successful collusion pact established and we're good to move forward

Yup. That should have everyone happy.

Should.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

The first order if the Mueller’s collusion delusion investigation, to investigate:
“(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... atters.pdf

It was an attempt to bring down a duly elected sitting POTUS by a bunch of poeople who didn’t like the result.

1) It wasn't some partisan Democrat that began the investigation. It was a Trump appointee. It was Trumps administration.
2) Based of the FACT that we the Russians did try to influence the election and by certain actions of Trump associates, the investigation was looking to see if there was a conspiracy. Trump Tower meeting. Flynn. The supposed request by Trump that Comey go easy on Flynn. Comey's firing.
3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.
4) Trump has a history with Russia. And Putin. He's said it himself, before 2016, that he met Putin.He knew Putin. He was developing a project there. Then suddenly, he reverses himself. You of all people loved to point out Obama's flip flops and lies yet you are giving Trump a pass. Why? B/c you're biased and un-principled.

If there's a "deep state" that initiated this investigation and then has cleared him of conspiracy - what does that logically tell you?

You're so biased that you simply have no objectivity.

FBI and DOJ are corrupt who cares if it was a Trump appointee? The only way your idiotic point would be valid is if Trump fired every member of both organizations and then appointed his guys.

Thats not what happened, it was an attempted political hatchet job by the side that lost the election and cant deal with it.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[CitadelGrad]

The first order if the Mueller’s collusion delusion investigation, to investigate:
“(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... atters.pdf

It was an attempt to bring down a duly elected sitting POTUS by a bunch of poeople who didn’t like the result.

3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.

So the insurance policy actually came from GEICO. I understand now.

[BDKJMU]

The first order if the Mueller’s collusion delusion investigation, to investigate:
“(i) any links and/or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald Trump”
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... atters.pdf

It was an attempt to bring down a duly elected sitting POTUS by a bunch of poeople who didn’t like the result.

1) It wasn't some partisan Democrat that began the investigation. It was a Trump appointee. It was Trumps administration.
2) Based of the FACT that we the Russians did try to influence the election and by certain actions of Trump associates, the investigation was looking to see if there was a conspiracy. Trump Tower meeting. Flynn. The supposed request by Trump that Comey go easy on Flynn. Comey's firing.
3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.
4) Trump has a history with Russia. And Putin. He's said it himself, before 2016, that he met Putin.He knew Putin. He was developing a project there. Then suddenly, he reverses himself. You of all people loved to point out Obama's flip flops and lies yet you are giving Trump a pass. Why? B/c you're biased and un-principled.

If there's a "deep state" that initiated this investigation and then has cleared him of conspiracy - what does that logically tell you?

You're so biased that you simply have no objectivity.

Yes it clearly was on the part of the crooked FBI..

[Ibanez]

1) It wasn't some partisan Democrat that began the investigation. It was a Trump appointee. It was Trumps administration.
2) Based of the FACT that we the Russians did try to influence the election and by certain actions of Trump associates, the investigation was looking to see if there was a conspiracy. Trump Tower meeting. Flynn. The supposed request by Trump that Comey go easy on Flynn. Comey's firing.
3) It wasn't an attempt to bring down a POTUS. It was to determine the scope and magnitude of Russian interference in our election.
4) Trump has a history with Russia. And Putin. He's said it himself, before 2016, that he met Putin.He knew Putin. He was developing a project there. Then suddenly, he reverses himself. You of all people loved to point out Obama's flip flops and lies yet you are giving Trump a pass. Why? B/c you're biased and un-principled.

If there's a "deep state" that initiated this investigation and then has cleared him of conspiracy - what does that logically tell you?

You're so biased that you simply have no objectivity.

Yes it clearly was on the part of the crooked FBI..

Crooked FBI or crooked FBI agents?

I'll be sure to keep that in mind the next time you clutch your pearls about federal law enforcement/investigation.

[89Hen]

What a great bump. Sticky, you might want to walk away from this one.

[GannonFan]

What a great bump. Sticky, you might want to walk away from this one.

Skelly didn't even show up in this thread - I think this was during his 4-6 months of self-isolation following the disaster of his Russia thread. Heck, at least the 6.93 guy and the AHO old Guy only had their huge gaffes around a post or two, Skelly has a 100+ page disaster of his own making. Really, in this thread it's JSO who's carrying the Russian collusion water pail, and since JSO is so far gone in terms of sanity I don't think this bump will impact him at all.

[Ibanez]

What a great bump. Sticky, you might want to walk away from this one.

Unlike Skelly, I can admit when I was wrong. No need to walk away.

[89Hen]

What a great bump. Sticky, you might want to walk away from this one.

Unlike Skelly, I can admit when I was wrong. No need to walk away.

You seemingly want to argue semantics with your only post on the bumped thread. That's why I suggested walking away.

[Ibanez]

Unlike Skelly, I can admit when I was wrong. No need to walk away.

You seemingly want to argue semantics with your only post on the bumped thread. That's why I suggested walking away.

Well it was my post that bumped the thread. Besides, I'm not arguing anything. You're reading into that.

Corrupt agents don't necessarily make an organization corrupt. If one of your direct reports is corrupt, does that in turn make your company corrupt? I asked a simple question. Is the FBI itself wholly corrupt or does it employ agents that have become corrupted? It seems to me that the FBI has allowed itself to become corrupt at high levels but I don't believe the organization as a whole is corrupt.


And it's curious that BDK would dig up a post from a year ago. Talk about doing some digging.

[89Hen]

You seemingly want to argue semantics with your only post on the bumped thread. That's why I suggested walking away.

Well it was my post that bumped the thread. Besides, I'm not arguing anything. You're reading into that.

Corrupt agents don't necessarily make an organization corrupt. If one of your direct reports is corrupt, does that in turn make your company corrupt? I asked a simple question. Is the FBI itself wholly corrupt or does it employ agents that have become corrupted? It seems to me that the FBI has allowed itself to become corrupt at high levels but I don't believe the organization as a whole is corrupt.


And it's curious that BDK would dig up a post from a year ago. Talk about doing some digging.

Again... you might want to walk away. Just friendly advice.

[Ibanez]

Well it was my post that bumped the thread. Besides, I'm not arguing anything. You're reading into that.

Corrupt agents don't necessarily make an organization corrupt. If one of your direct reports is corrupt, does that in turn make your company corrupt? I asked a simple question. Is the FBI itself wholly corrupt or does it employ agents that have become corrupted? It seems to me that the FBI has allowed itself to become corrupt at high levels but I don't believe the organization as a whole is corrupt.


And it's curious that BDK would dig up a post from a year ago. Talk about doing some digging.

Again... you might want to walk away. Just friendly advice.

You mudafucka

[SeattleGriz]

This thread didn't age well.

If more of the Trump haters had just read the conservative Treehouse...

To be honest, still unsure if anyone of consequence will go to jail.

[CID1990]

You seemingly want to argue semantics with your only post on the bumped thread. That's why I suggested walking away.

Well it was my post that bumped the thread. Besides, I'm not arguing anything. You're reading into that.

Corrupt agents don't necessarily make an organization corrupt. If one of your direct reports is corrupt, does that in turn make your company corrupt? I asked a simple question. Is the FBI itself wholly corrupt or does it employ agents that have become corrupted? It seems to me that the FBI has allowed itself to become corrupt at high levels but I don't believe the organization as a whole is corrupt.


And it's curious that BDK would dig up a post from a year ago. Talk about doing some digging.

When those corrupt agents are the TOP agent and 2-3 of his TOP lieutenants, the yes, that tars the whole agency

It is unfortunate for the vast majority of honest FBI agents but it is true


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[UNI88]

Well it was my post that bumped the thread. Besides, I'm not arguing anything. You're reading into that.

Corrupt agents don't necessarily make an organization corrupt. If one of your direct reports is corrupt, does that in turn make your company corrupt? I asked a simple question. Is the FBI itself wholly corrupt or does it employ agents that have become corrupted? It seems to me that the FBI has allowed itself to become corrupt at high levels but I don't believe the organization as a whole is corrupt.

nd it's curious that BDK would dig up a post from a year ago. Talk about doing some digging.

When those corrupt agents are the TOP agent and 2-3 of his TOP lieutenants, the yes, that tars the whole agency

It is unfortunate for the vast majority of honest FBI agents but it is true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's true but I do enjoy watching BDKKK get BDKKK'ed (nitpicked over the details).

[BDKJMU]

Well it was my post that bumped the thread. Besides, I'm not arguing anything. You're reading into that.

Corrupt agents don't necessarily make an organization corrupt. If one of your direct reports is corrupt, does that in turn make your company corrupt? I asked a simple question. Is the FBI itself wholly corrupt or does it employ agents that have become corrupted? It seems to me that the FBI has allowed itself to become corrupt at high levels but I don't believe the organization as a whole is corrupt.


And it's curious that BDK would dig up a post from a year ago. Talk about doing some digging.

When those corrupt agents are the TOP agent and 2-3 of his TOP lieutenants, the yes, that tars the whole agency

It is unfortunate for the vast majority of honest FBI agents but it is true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yep..

[BDKJMU]

What a great bump. Sticky, you might want to walk away from this one.

Skelly didn't even show up in this thread - I think this was during his 4-6 months of self-isolation following the disaster of his Russia thread. Heck, at least the 6.93 guy and the AHO old Guy only had their huge gaffes around a post or two, Skelly has a 100+ page disaster of his own making. Really, in this thread it's JSO who's carrying the Russian collusion water pail, and since JSO is so far gone in terms of sanity I don't think this bump will impact him at all.

200+

[BDKJMU]

When those corrupt agents are the TOP agent and 2-3 of his TOP lieutenants, the yes, that tars the whole agency

It is unfortunate for the vast majority of honest FBI agents but it is true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That's true but I do enjoy watching BDKKK get BDKKK'ed (nitpicked over the details).

I not getting nitpicked over anything..Just proven right..