The other obvious thing is elected politicians have to do something now….kalm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:16 amIt’s fine being skeptical. That helps drive better science.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2024 8:13 am I don’t pretend that human activity is not causing some global warming, but there have been so many dire forecast that have just not materialized. And we don’t know how the Earth is going to be able to process this uptick in CO2 in the atmosphere. These warming models predicting future temperatures are very complicated with a lot of guesswork. Some might be motivated to tinker with those unknown variables in the models to manipulate the model in producing that result they want to see
Does anyone know how the deep oceans are playing into this process ?
It could take hundreds and hundreds of years to work itself out. Maybe hundreds of thousands of years
I don’t think it hurts at all to use common sense and try to reduce CO2 emissions, but it just seems to be a lot of rush and panic involved with at all. Thats the part I have a problem with. And let’s not pretend this severe crisis hasn’t generated millions of dollars for people. If it wasn’t severe, there would be no money in it.
is it going to be their best career interest to say we have time to figure this out… of course not
CH just feels like we have the time and Joeys panic mode approach is wrong…. Just as a do nothing approach is not the best answer either