Just make laws that forbid trains breaking down and put up no derailment signs everywhere.89Hen wrote:You're crazy. Trains never break down, derail or are delayed.Ibanez wrote:BDK.not just eliminmate air travel...BUILD A HIGH SPEED RAIL ACROSS THE OCEANS!Who doesn't want take that trip and derail someone where or get stranded/break down during hurricane season.
From comments section in above link:BDKJMU wrote:In a nutshell over the next 10 years:
-Ban affordable energy (eliminating all fossil fuels).
-Eliminate nuclear energy.
-Eliminating most cars (eliminating the internnal combustion engine).
-Gut/rebuild every building in America to make it "Green".
-Eliminate air travel.
-Build high speed rail across the oceans.
-Guaranteed job for everyone.
-"Free" education for life for everyone.
-Housing guaranteed for everyone.
-Income guaranteed for everyone, including those who don't want to work.
-"Healthy" food guaranteed for everyone.
-Banning meat: "because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... cture.html
And every donk candidate will have to sign on to this if they want to win the donk nomination...
This biscuit probably thinks giving a little head will knock her up
Where do i sign up im ready to quit my job
She has a mental issue.
The way she is campaigning her breath must be worse than my fart
AOC. Ass on crack.
I feel sorry for all of the dumb blonde joke writers, they are out of business while this nutcase is in office.
Didn't she once say that Electoral College had its own football team?
Five minutes with her is enough to send Gandhi climb a water tower with a deer rifle.
AOC is the human embodiment of an Onion article
I consider myself a pretty extreme leftist and I think this woman needs a drug test.
First they came for the cows, then they came for me
Well true everywhere outside of Baltimore.89Hen wrote:You're crazy. Trains never break down, derail or are delayed.Ibanez wrote:BDK.not just eliminmate air travel...BUILD A HIGH SPEED RAIL ACROSS THE OCEANS!
Tell us again how you are a conservative who just dislikes Trump.JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
Most smart people are able to look beyond the "show" and squarely at the substance. You are proving to be in a different camp.JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
I said that she said some things I think are incorrect. I'm just talking about how effective she is at presentation. I do not agree with her philosophy of government at all. I'm just telling you she's formidable. That's the first time I've watched her in complete context and saw how she comes off as she handles herself. And she is good. Very good. I don't think the Republicans want to raise her up and make her a figure that gets a bunch of air time so that people in the "middle" will become familiar with her and hear her speak at any length. Yes they can fire up their base with her. But they risk having her end up convincing the "middle" to go the other way. I think they'd be better off ignoring her and trying to make sure she stays as much out of the public eye as possible.CAA Flagship wrote:Most smart people are able to look beyond the "show" and squarely at the substance. You are proving to be in a different camp.JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
Old age and treachery will beat youth and inexperience 99 times out of 100...JohnStOnge wrote:BTW I after watching her for the first time in an extended interview I am even more convinced that if there were a debate between her and Trump she would absolutely annihilate him. It would be quick young brain vs. old buffoon. That's how it would come off. No doubt.
Like middle class Trump voters?CAA Flagship wrote:Most smart people are able to look beyond the "show" and squarely at the substance. You are proving to be in a different camp.JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
FYPCol Hogan wrote:Old age and treachery will beat youth and exuberance 99 times out of 100...JohnStOnge wrote:BTW I after watching her for the first time in an extended interview I am even more convinced that if there were a debate between her and Trump she would absolutely annihilate him. It would be quick young brain vs. old buffoon. That's how it would come off. No doubt.
I don't know if that's true or not. But I am pretty confident that if this woman squared off in a debate against Trump she would destroy him. I really don't know if the "Old vs. Young" idea that "Old" wins holds anyway.Col Hogan wrote:Old age and treachery will beat youth and inexperience 99 times out of 100...JohnStOnge wrote:BTW I after watching her for the first time in an extended interview I am even more convinced that if there were a debate between her and Trump she would absolutely annihilate him. It would be quick young brain vs. old buffoon. That's how it would come off. No doubt.
What do you think is positive about him?UNI88 wrote:Trump is a buffoon but JSO's hatred for all things Trump blinds him from being able to see anything positive about the orange man.
Well, this isn’t necessarily a positive about Trump specifically - but if Hillary had won we would have a significantly more liberal SCOTUSJohnStOnge wrote:What do you think is positive about him?UNI88 wrote:Trump is a buffoon but JSO's hatred for all things Trump blinds him from being able to see anything positive about the orange man.
AZ posted a long list of things that could be considered positive accomplishments. I don't agree with all of them but there are definitely some positive accomplishments on there. I also don't think the trade spat with China is a bad thing for reasons that I've posted before as well.JohnStOnge wrote:What do you think is positive about him?UNI88 wrote:Trump is a buffoon but JSO's hatred for all things Trump blinds him from being able to see anything positive about the orange man.
SCOTUS/ conservative Lower court judgesJohnStOnge wrote:What do you think is positive about him?UNI88 wrote:Trump is a buffoon but JSO's hatred for all things Trump blinds him from being able to see anything positive about the orange man.
kalm wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
She’s young and will have her share of gaffs but she’s clearly smarter than the POTUS and 3/4’s of Congress. (Not that either is saying much).
-Judicial appointmentsJohnStOnge wrote:What do you think is positive about him?UNI88 wrote:Trump is a buffoon but JSO's hatred for all things Trump blinds him from being able to see anything positive about the orange man.
Damn you, BDK.BDKJMU wrote:-Judicial appointmentsJohnStOnge wrote:
What do you think is positive about him?
-Tax cuts
-Getting tougher on illegal immigration
-Nixing the Iran Deal
-Pulling out of the Paris Climate deal.
-Getting deadbeat NATO countries to pledge to pay more.
-Getting tough on China. A trade war is bad, but China we have a massive trade deficit with China, they put tariffs on US goods, they manipulates their currency, and commit economic espionage on a massive scale.
-Pulling out Syria
-Cutting regulations
That's just off the top of my head..
If you're that easily fooled, we are doomed.JohnStOnge wrote:I honestly had never seen much of the woman until I watched her in an interview on Meet the Press Daily this evening. After watching her in that interview I think people who dismiss her do so at their peril. And, no, it's not like Trump. Trump comes off as a buffoon. In that interview I watched, at least, she came off as articulate and quick on her feet. Even her vocabulary was impressive. She said some things I think are incorrect. But she was very persuasive in the way she handled herself.
Maybe the interview I watched was an exception. I don't know. But she handled herself very well. If Republicans are thinking of making her the villain and calling attention to her they may want to rethink that strategy. They do NOT want to give that woman oxygen because she's very effective.
