Real genius, that one.Ibanez wrote:Col Hogan wrote:
So says AOC...apparently, being a Congress Critter is hard work...
https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/aoc-on- ... p-me-busy/What did she think her job was going to be?
She probably didn't know about committee assignments. It's not all junkets and parties at the British Embassy.AZGrizFan wrote:Real genius, that one.Ibanez wrote:
#dumberthanaboxofrocks
maybe she thinks she can sleep her way to the top in congress too, just like how she got her college degree.Ibanez wrote:She probably didn't know about committee assignments. It's not all junkets and parties at the British Embassy.AZGrizFan wrote:
Real genius, that one.
#dumberthanaboxofrocks
Could she sleep her way to the top in your CU?AZGrizFan wrote:maybe she thinks she can sleep her way to the top in congress too, just like how she got her college degree.Ibanez wrote: She probably didn't know about committee assignments. It's not all junkets and parties at the British Embassy.
Then again, she's probably correct there.
Ivytalk wrote:Could she sleep her way to the top in your CU?AZGrizFan wrote:
maybe she thinks she can sleep her way to the top in congress too, just like how she got her college degree.
Then again, she's probably correct there.
Signs point to yes.
Interesting...CID1990 wrote:Sidelong accusations of racism in a debate are just the last gasps of a losing argument. It is merely a strategy to put people on the defensive.
It is juvenile - and should be ignored.
Well, if the debate consists of someone actually being a racist, then yeah - it’s exactly the same thing as calling someone a crybaby (when they are being a crybaby)Chizzang wrote:Interesting...CID1990 wrote:Sidelong accusations of racism in a debate are just the last gasps of a losing argument. It is merely a strategy to put people on the defensive.
It is juvenile - and should be ignored.
is it anything like calling somebody a snowflake or a crybaby..?
CID1990 wrote:Well, if the debate consists of someone actually being a racist, then yeah - it’s exactly the same thing as calling someone a crybaby (when they are being a crybaby)Chizzang wrote:
Interesting...
is it anything like calling somebody a snowflake or a crybaby..?
Complete covfefe and you know itChizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Well, if the debate consists of someone actually being a racist, then yeah - it’s exactly the same thing as calling someone a crybaby (when they are being a crybaby)
It's like you're actually turning into Trump
So there's not just a SJW purity test as CID suggested but there’s now a party purity test?
Black’s can’t be racist? 
Already happening...and it’s delicious to watch unfold.kalm wrote:So there's not just a SJW purity test as CID suggested but there’s now a party purity test?
The establishment couches their control in racism accusations. I’m not sure the Justice Democrats are gonna take that so well. This could get ugly.
Jeezus H Christ...Trump is gonna win in a landslide.AZGrizFan wrote:Already happening...and it’s delicious to watch unfold.kalm wrote:
So there's not just a SJW purity test as CID suggested but there’s now a party purity test?
The establishment couches their control in racism accusations. I’m not sure the Justice Democrats are gonna take that so well. This could get ugly.
The difference is that one word is used to change the subject and stop all rational discussion while the other one used against someone else trying to stop rational discussion.Chizzang wrote:Interesting...CID1990 wrote:Sidelong accusations of racism in a debate are just the last gasps of a losing argument. It is merely a strategy to put people on the defensive.
It is juvenile - and should be ignored.
is it anything like calling somebody a snowflake or a crybaby..?
Oh, it’s already ugly, klam....kalm wrote:So there's not just a SJW purity test as CID suggested but there’s now a party purity test?
The establishment couches their control in racism accusations. I’m not sure the Justice Democrats are gonna take that so well. This could get ugly.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
You could see this coming as soon as Hildabeast lost. They are SO out of touch, instead of realizing they needed to move towards the center, they kneejerked further left.Baldy wrote:Jeezus H Christ...Trump is gonna win in a landslide.AZGrizFan wrote:
Already happening...and it’s delicious to watch unfold.
All they had to do was NOT go bat shit insane, but they just can't help themselves.
AZGrizFan wrote:You could see this coming as soon as Hildabeast lost. They are SO out of touch, instead of realizing they needed to move towards the center, they kneejerked further left.Baldy wrote: Jeezus H Christ...Trump is gonna win in a landslide.
All they had to do was NOT go bat shit insane, but they just can't help themselves.
Yeah! They need to pander to Wall Street, apply interventionist foreign policy, and rekindle the war on drugs even more!AZGrizFan wrote:You could see this coming as soon as Hildabeast lost. They are SO out of touch, instead of realizing they needed to move towards the center, they kneejerked further left.Baldy wrote: Jeezus H Christ...Trump is gonna win in a landslide.
All they had to do was NOT go bat shit insane, but they just can't help themselves.
Still have my twenty bucks in a sock with “Joe ‘20” on it.Chizzang wrote:SO now you're all starting to believe me when I said: Trump 2020
I've even got money on it with Ivy...
who got confused momentarily and thought Joe Biden wouldn't be consumed by the Feminist SJW takeover
I'll repeat it:
Trump 2020
Reading comprehension = 0kalm wrote:Yeah! They need to pander to Wall Street, apply interventionist foreign policy, and rekindle the war on drugs even more!AZGrizFan wrote:
You could see this coming as soon as Hildabeast lost. They are SO out of touch, instead of realizing they needed to move towards the center, they kneejerked further left.
