Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

[Chizzang]

What's in dispute is if the warming trend is indeed a cycle or a problem
That is the debate

What? The debate is whether man can do anything about it. It doesn't take much to determine if sea level rise will be a problem.

Okay... but if it's a cycle we don;t need to "do" anything
sure, the debate is varied
but its certainly not about "IF" the earth is warming

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Um... the Globe is indeed "warming"
That isn't even in dispute its simply a documented fact that nobody is even bothering to argue
except our completely uninformed President...

What's in dispute is if the warming trend is indeed a cycle or a problem
That is the debate

Nobody is debating "if the globe is warming"
because we have these things called thermometers since about 1700

What is also fascinating is that "pockets" of land mass are getting colder in winter and hotter in summer
and being effected by new wind patterns (see: Iowa and Central Europe)
but overall the earth temperatures are rising

Bullshit, it's not a debate there is nothing we are doing to change climate. Our atmosphere is too voluminous for us to effect. The earth does what it does and even setting off nuclear warheads we couldn't tick it in any direction

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

Um... the Globe is indeed "warming"
That isn't even in dispute its simply a documented fact that nobody is even bothering to argue
except our completely uninformed President...

What's in dispute is if the warming trend is indeed a cycle or a problem
That is the debate

Nobody is debating "if the globe is warming"
because we have these things called thermometers since about 1700

What is also fascinating is that "pockets" of land mass are getting colder in winter and hotter in summer
and being effected by new wind patterns (see: Iowa and Central Europe)
but overall the earth temperatures are rising

Bullshit, it's not a debate there is nothing we are doing to change climate. Our atmosphere is too voluminous for us to effect. The earth does what it does and even setting off nuclear warheads we couldn't tick it in any direction

I think we all already know what camp you're in...

I was simply pointing out that your large yellow poster is not correct - the Earth is warming

The debate isn't if its warming
the debate is can we do anything about it

[89Hen]

Nobody is debating "if the globe is warming"

You forget to whom you are talking.

[UNI88]

When someone isn't part of the conversation I try to use they, them, etc. just to be safe. I had it happen at a restaurant on Sunday. I didn't know the gender preference of the waitperson but called them she because I felt that was the most likely choice but I should have used they.

Little Flaggy could have had some fun with it. Put down god/deity or something.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I'm sympathetic to people's feelings. I really am. If I know someone wanted to be called something other than he/she, then I would do it. But if I don't know, and I call a person he/she, that person better not get pissed off at me while correcting me. **** that person for not understanding that the neon **** sign on the top of its head is not lit.

So I asked my wife and son how many nametags did they notice that read something other than he/she. They didn't notice any. Probably only saw 50 of the 500 or so.

I completely agree with you. It's really no skin off my back so I try and accommodate people but I'm going to occasionally get it wrong and I don't really need a snowflake/cupcake getting upset because of a mistake.

[Chizzang]

Nobody is debating "if the globe is warming"

You forget to whom you are talking.

I'm actually trying to be helpful...
I've dialed my SMUG factor down two notches

informing the uninformed as to exactly what the actual debate in global warming is
it's alarming how many are still confused about what we're arguing

Calling it a Chinese hoax isn't particularly helpful either
especially when both opinions on the actual debate are valid
The only invalid position is the "it isn't real" position

[89Hen]

it's alarming how many are still confused about what we're arguing

Yes, but many on the other side consider it settled science and there is no room for debate. Like you and abortion.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

You forget to whom you are talking.

I'm actually trying to be helpful...
I've dialed my SMUG factor down two notches

informing the uninformed as to exactly what the actual debate in global warming is
it's alarming how many are still confused about what we're arguing

Calling it a Chinese hoax isn't particularly helpful either
especially when both opinions on the actual debate are valid
The only invalid position is the "it isn't real" position

It isn't real, (the crisis) the earth will do what it wants when it wants, how it wants.

Pro global warming douchebags have upped their smug prick game to levels you will never attain

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

The problem with “the debate” is that nobody is on the same page but everybody is on the wrong page

The climate hoaxers/deniers/whatever aren’t convinced that climate change is anthropogenic

The climate change proponents/alarmists/whatever are past that and have moved on to the actual effects

But the people trying to tell us what the effects are going to be are as fact challenged as the people who don’t buy into AGW in the first place... and in fact the ignorance of the deniers is reinforced by the ignorance of the hockey stickers

Let’s face it -

Whatever the effects are, we are going to get them full force


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

Let’s face it -

Whatever the effects are, we are going to get them full force

yup..

[Ibanez]

The problem with “the debate” is that nobody is on the same page but everybody is on the wrong page

The climate hoaxers/deniers/whatever aren’t convinced that climate change is anthropogenic

The climate change proponents/alarmists/whatever are past that and have moved on to the actual effects

But the people trying to tell us what the effects are going to be are as fact challenged as the people who don’t buy into AGW in the first place... and in fact the ignorance of the deniers is reinforced by the ignorance of the hockey stickers

Let’s face it -

Whatever the effects are, we are going to get them full force


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Chinese Hoax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

You forget to whom you are talking.

I'm actually trying to be helpful...
I've dialed my SMUG factor down two notches

informing the uninformed as to exactly what the actual debate in global warming is
it's alarming how many are still confused about what we're arguing

Calling it a Chinese hoax isn't particularly helpful either
especially when both opinions on the actual debate are valid
The only invalid position is the "it isn't real" position

Your proof it is warming? Because the global warming community has been caught multiple times "correcting" data.

[CitadelGrad]

I'm actually trying to be helpful...
I've dialed my SMUG factor down two notches

informing the uninformed as to exactly what the actual debate in global warming is
it's alarming how many are still confused about what we're arguing

Calling it a Chinese hoax isn't particularly helpful either
especially when both opinions on the actual debate are valid
The only invalid position is the "it isn't real" position

Your proof it is warming? Because the global warming community has been caught multiple times "correcting" data.

And falsifying data.

[CID1990]

I'm actually trying to be helpful...
I've dialed my SMUG factor down two notches

informing the uninformed as to exactly what the actual debate in global warming is
it's alarming how many are still confused about what we're arguing

Calling it a Chinese hoax isn't particularly helpful either
especially when both opinions on the actual debate are valid
The only invalid position is the "it isn't real" position

Your proof it is warming? Because the global warming community has been caught multiple times "correcting" data.

See my post above ^^^^

I think that covers it already

(but we ARE affecting the climate)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

Your proof it is warming? Because the global warming community has been caught multiple times "correcting" data.

See my post above ^^^^

I think that covers it already

(but we ARE affecting the climate)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh I get that those that believe we are changing the climate have no clue what to do to solve that. One of my favorite questions is to ask, "what can I do about it" and then sit back and listen to the response.

It usually is stuff I have already done or am currently doing, like recycling, weatherproofing my house, etc.

I asked for proof of warming because it's always interesting to see what people come up with. The models are a joke and we seem to be in a holding pattern since 2004 in regards to warming.

[kalm]

See my post above ^^^^

I think that covers it already

(but we ARE affecting the climate)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh I get that those that believe we are changing the climate have no clue what to do to solve that. One of my favorite questions is to ask, "what can I do about it" and then sit back and listen to the response.

It usually is stuff I have already done or am currently doing, like recycling, weatherproofing my house, etc.

I asked for proof of warming because it's always interesting to see what people come up with. The models are a joke and we seem to be in a holding pattern since 2004 in regards to warming.

It has? That would be great news!

[SeattleGriz]

Oh I get that those that believe we are changing the climate have no clue what to do to solve that. One of my favorite questions is to ask, "what can I do about it" and then sit back and listen to the response.

It usually is stuff I have already done or am currently doing, like recycling, weatherproofing my house, etc.

I asked for proof of warming because it's always interesting to see what people come up with. The models are a joke and we seem to be in a holding pattern since 2004 in regards to warming.

It has? That would be great news!

Yep. It's from NOAA. As soon as I get home, I can post the graph.

[Chizzang]

It has? That would be great news!

Yep. It's from NOAA. As soon as I get home, I can post the graph.

No it doesn't
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series

[Chizzang]

[SeattleGriz]

Yep. It's from NOAA. As soon as I get home, I can post the graph.

No it doesn't
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series

This view seems to say that. Continuous average temperature. 2019 is cooling so far and below 2004. Downward trend.

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-prec ... 9&month=12

[Chizzang]

No it doesn't
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/national/time-series

This view seems to say that. Continuous average temperature. 2019 is cooling so far and below 2004. Downward trend.

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-prec ... 9&month=12

No it doesn't

[SeattleGriz]

This view seems to say that. Continuous average temperature. 2019 is cooling so far and below 2004. Downward trend.

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-prec ... 9&month=12

No it doesn't

You can't read graphs, can you.

[kalm]

No it doesn't

You can't read graphs, can you.

I’m no scientist. But something tells me the word anomaly is important here.

[SeattleGriz]

You can't read graphs, can you.

I’m no scientist. But something tells me the word anomaly is important here.

Change.

Change from continuous average temperature.

You can see 2019 has started out under average.

But there is more to the graph. See if anyone knows why.

[CAA Flagship]

I’m no scientist. But something tells me the word anomaly is important here.

Change.

Change from continuous average temperature.

You can see 2019 has started out under average.

But there is more to the graph. See if anyone knows why.

I'm not sure what you are looking at. What filters are you using? Are you looking at annual global average temperature data?