They don’t say anything about Reek, I don’t think they know who he is.kalm wrote:What does Hot Air say about it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They don’t say anything about Reek, I don’t think they know who he is.kalm wrote:What does Hot Air say about it?
Yep. Jelly only parrots the narratives once they are distributed. But he's been doing that for over 4 years on this topic, so why stop now?CID1990 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:51 amA Vanity Fair “splainer” article about a NYT article drops, Hillary points to it, and 2 hrs later Reek pops up with talking points.Ivytalk wrote:Analjelly feels very proprietary about “his” thread.
You’d think the little ankle biter would have learned his lesson by now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In regards to the lawyer recusing themselves, isn't it because that law firm, which Liz Cheney's boobie works, also represents multiple Clinton associated people and they just might choose to sacrifice Sussman to save the higher ups?Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:15 pm Uhhh. Y'all do know Durham made a follow up filing due to the media uproar? He literally said his filing was "misinterpreted" by the media (read: Fox News and the Federalist).![]()
Durham was arguing that one of Sussman's lawyers should recuse himself and that's it.
And, for Ivy: this is hardly "my" thread anymore. Over half of it is about the Deep State conspiracy... which, for some reason has a different standard.
Though, if y'all are right, surely there will be some more juicy indictments coming swiftly behind such a filing.
[ x ] Doubt
Wait, wasn't this supposed to end in Trump Russia collusion being proven?Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:15 pm Uhhh. Y'all do know Durham made a follow up filing due to the media uproar? He literally said his filing was "misinterpreted" by the media (read: Fox News and the Federalist).![]()
Durham was arguing that one of Sussman's lawyers should recuse himself and that's it.
And, for Ivy: this is hardly "my" thread anymore. Over half of it is about the Deep State conspiracy... which, for some reason has a different standard.
Though, if y'all are right, surely there will be some more juicy indictments coming swiftly behind such a filing.
[ x ] Doubt
Hows that Durham investigation going anyway?SDHornet wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 7:23 pmWait, wasn't this supposed to end in Trump Russia collusion being proven?Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 7:15 pm Uhhh. Y'all do know Durham made a follow up filing due to the media uproar? He literally said his filing was "misinterpreted" by the media (read: Fox News and the Federalist).![]()
Durham was arguing that one of Sussman's lawyers should recuse himself and that's it.
And, for Ivy: this is hardly "my" thread anymore. Over half of it is about the Deep State conspiracy... which, for some reason has a different standard.
Though, if y'all are right, surely there will be some more juicy indictments coming swiftly behind such a filing.
[ x ] Doubt
*checks notes*
Yes, yes it was. But yeah you're totally in the clear because of a Durham follow up filing.![]()
Benghazi was a picnic compared to the Bowling Green Massacre and the Battle of Covfefekalm wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:19 pmShhh…quiet. Let them have their jollies. People like Trump and Hillary don’t get in trouble.JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:58 pm
Another bogus right wing conspiracy theory. The filing does not say anybody was spying on Trump or that anybody was "wiretapped." See https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/14/us/p ... ussia.html.
This is not what it's being presented as being by right-wing media.
But Benghazi!?!
![]()
Or the Battle of the sky over New England.
I've heard that the few survivors won't even speak of it..
I think we all know Durham will only go after the low hanging fruit and stay away from government employees. He won't be able to square what Hillary did with what Mueller didn't find, so nobody important will fall. He can't expose Mueller was hired to clean up the surveillance mess and harass Trump.
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Apr 20, 2022 7:21 amI think we all know Durham will only go after the low hanging fruit and stay away from government employees. He won't be able to square what Hillary did with what Mueller didn't find, so nobody important will fall. He can't expose Mueller was hired to clean up the surveillance mess and harass Trump.
Mueller? Guy couldn't find his own ass with both hands even before he started talking like Biden.houndawg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 6:44 amYou mean the obstruction of justice that Mueller let slide because the perp was holding high office ?SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Wed Apr 20, 2022 7:21 am
I think we all know Durham will only go after the low hanging fruit and stay away from government employees. He won't be able to square what Hillary did with what Mueller didn't find, so nobody important will fall. He can't expose Mueller was hired to clean up the surveillance mess and harass Trump.![]()
Hey! Look over there!SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 6:48 amMueller? Guy couldn't find his own ass with both hands even before he started talking like Biden.
Look at what? There was no substance to the "obstruction".houndawg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:03 amHey! Look over there!SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Apr 23, 2022 6:48 am
Mueller? Guy couldn't find his own ass with both hands even before he started talking like Biden.![]()
Here's a little more with names.