Did you read the responding tweets?kalm wrote:
Taibbi is 100x the journalist that Filipkowski is.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you read the responding tweets?kalm wrote:
Well I would hope so, Baldy, considering Filipkowski isn’t a journalist (like most people on Twitter).
Aren't those 12 indicted the ones that they knew would never show up in court? And related they dropped charges against 2 other Russian companies because they decided to fight back and filed for discovery?
Yes. Lieu is not very bright and he's counting on the average low information liberal to buy what he's selling.
8 guilty pleas, one conviction at trial, 37 individuals and companies charged. Not enough evidence for the obstruction charge and the DOJ wouldn’t prosecute a sitting president as per policy.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 11:43 amYes. Lieu is not very bright and he's counting on the average low information liberal to buy what he's selling.
List the pleas and convictions. Let's see how many pertain to Russia collusion.kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:07 pm8 guilty pleas, one conviction at trial, 37 individuals and companies charged. Not enough evidence for the obstruction charge and the DOJ wouldn’t prosecute a sitting president as per policy.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 11:43 am
Yes. Lieu is not very bright and he's counting on the average low information liberal to buy what he's selling.
Are the Russians still crazy about golf? Has Trump condemned Russia yet for bombing civilians?
But hey, thanks for the insult!
That was in the original I posted. The simple point is a lack of indicting/convicting Trump is not proof he wasn’t/isn’t still in bed financially with the Russians. Christ, Forbes is now reporting he made $5.4 million renting a vacant space in Trump Tower to the Chinese and sold a penthouse for $15.8 million to someone with ties to Chinese military intelligence.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 2:03 pmList the pleas and convictions. Let's see how many pertain to Russia collusion.kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 1:07 pm
8 guilty pleas, one conviction at trial, 37 individuals and companies charged. Not enough evidence for the obstruction charge and the DOJ wouldn’t prosecute a sitting president as per policy.
Are the Russians still crazy about golf? Has Trump condemned Russia yet for bombing civilians?
But hey, thanks for the insult!
And this.
kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:12 pmThat was in the original I posted. The simple point is a lack of indicting/convicting Trump is not proof he wasn’t/isn’t still in bed financially with the Russians. Christ, Forbes is now reporting he made $5.4 million renting a vacant space in Trump Tower to the Chinese and sold a penthouse for $15.8 million to someone with ties to Chinese military intelligence.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 2:03 pm
List the pleas and convictions. Let's see how many pertain to Russia collusion.
And this.
I know this might come as a shock but Donald may not be exactly worthy of trust.
Trump can't be trusted, but yet you can read all about his transactions in a national news source? Man is he terrible at being sneaky!kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:12 pmThat was in the original I posted. The simple point is a lack of indicting/convicting Trump is not proof he wasn’t/isn’t still in bed financially with the Russians. Christ, Forbes is now reporting he made $5.4 million renting a vacant space in Trump Tower to the Chinese and sold a penthouse for $15.8 million to someone with ties to Chinese military intelligence.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 2:03 pm
List the pleas and convictions. Let's see how many pertain to Russia collusion.
And this.
I know this might come as a shock but Donald may not be exactly worthy of trust.
SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:57 pmTrump can't be trusted, but yet you can read all about his transactions in a national news source? Man is he terrible at being sneaky!kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:12 pm
That was in the original I posted. The simple point is a lack of indicting/convicting Trump is not proof he wasn’t/isn’t still in bed financially with the Russians. Christ, Forbes is now reporting he made $5.4 million renting a vacant space in Trump Tower to the Chinese and sold a penthouse for $15.8 million to someone with ties to Chinese military intelligence.
I know this might come as a shock but Donald may not be exactly worthy of trust.![]()
Oh, you have inside sources different than your typical sources. Please dish them up.houndawg wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 7:10 pmSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:57 pm
Trump can't be trusted, but yet you can read all about his transactions in a national news source? Man is he terrible at being sneaky!![]()
![]()
FYPSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:57 pmTrump can't be trusted, but yet you can read all about his transactions in a national news source? Man, is he incompetent boob!kalm wrote: ↑Sun Jan 15, 2023 3:12 pm
That was in the original I posted. The simple point is a lack of indicting/convicting Trump is not proof he wasn’t/isn’t still in bed financially with the Russians. Christ, Forbes is now reporting he made $5.4 million renting a vacant space in Trump Tower to the Chinese and sold a penthouse for $15.8 million to someone with ties to Chinese military intelligence.
I know this might come as a shock but Donald may not be exactly worthy of trust.![]()
UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:51 amFYPSeattleGriz wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 1:57 pm
Trump can't be trusted, but yet you can read all about his transactions in a national news source? Man, is he incompetent boob!![]()
Still didn't give a list of how many convictions were due to the Russians colluding with Trump to win the election.
There were no convictions from the Mueller report? Ok.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 9:49 amStill didn't give a list of how many convictions were due to the Russians colluding with Trump to win the election.
I'll help you. Zero.
Correct. No convictions as it relates to Trump colluding with the Russians to steal the election. Hell, Mueller didn't even get to look at the DNC server, so he couldn't even make the claim it was hacked.kalm wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 10:34 amThere were no convictions from the Mueller report? Ok.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 9:49 am
Still didn't give a list of how many convictions were due to the Russians colluding with Trump to win the election.
I'll help you. Zero.
Sure.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 11:08 amCorrect. No convictions as it relates to Trump colluding with the Russians to steal the election. Hell, Mueller didn't even get to look at the DNC server, so he couldn't even make the claim it was hacked.
TDS is strong with you.kalm wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 11:38 amSure.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 11:08 am
Correct. No convictions as it relates to Trump colluding with the Russians to steal the election. Hell, Mueller didn't even get to look at the DNC server, so he couldn't even make the claim it was hacked.![]()
Along with a team of experienced prosecutors and attorneys, the former FBI director has indicted, convicted or gotten guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies, including top advisers to President Trump, Russian spies and hackers with ties to the Kremlin. The charges, which Mueller referenced during his opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee on July 24, range from interfering with the 2016 election and hacking emails to lying to investigators and tampering with witnesses.
But Mueller did not charge or suggest charges for anyone on one of the biggest questions he faced: whether the Trump campaign worked with the Russians to influence the election.
tDS is strong with both of you. kalm has Type I while you suffer from Type II.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 12:31 pmTDS is strong with you.
https://time.com/5556331/mueller-invest ... lty-pleas/
Along with a team of experienced prosecutors and attorneys, the former FBI director has indicted, convicted or gotten guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies, including top advisers to President Trump, Russian spies and hackers with ties to the Kremlin. The charges, which Mueller referenced during his opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee on July 24, range from interfering with the 2016 election and hacking emails to lying to investigators and tampering with witnesses.
But Mueller did not charge or suggest charges for anyone on one of the biggest questions he faced: whether the Trump campaign worked with the Russians to influence the election.
But who's closer to the truth. Klam with his list of process crimes that had nothing to do with collusion between Trump and Russia, or me who pointed out that inconvenient fact?UNI88 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:03 pmtDS is strong with both of you. kalm has Type I while you suffer from Type II.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 12:31 pm
TDS is strong with you.
https://time.com/5556331/mueller-invest ... lty-pleas/
![]()
On Russia collusion, I think you are closer to the truth.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:31 pmBut who's closer to the truth. Klam with his list of process crimes that had nothing to do with collusion between Trump and Russia, or me who pointed out that inconvenient fact?
I'm 100% right. Klam is spreading fake news.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 5:48 pmOn Russia collusion, I think you are closer to the truth.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:31 pm
But who's closer to the truth. Klam with his list of process crimes that had nothing to do with collusion between Trump and Russia, or me who pointed out that inconvenient fact?
WASHINGTON — The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.
Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee's computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system, one US intelligence official told BuzzFeed News.
I’m ok with this.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 5:48 pmOn Russia collusion, I think you are closer to the truth.SeattleGriz wrote: ↑Sat Jan 21, 2023 2:31 pm
But who's closer to the truth. Klam with his list of process crimes that had nothing to do with collusion between Trump and Russia, or me who pointed out that inconvenient fact?