2022 SCOTUS rulings

[HI54UNI]

Now that men can have babies the SC may overturn Roe? That's some bullshit! Why does the SC hate men?

Wait a minute...wasn't the leftist joke for years that if men could have babies, abortions would be legal everywhere?

Spoiler: show

I had that in there when I originally started my post and deleted it hoping someone would remember that.

[kalm]

[Winterborn]

Says the guy who more than likely been aborted in today's society.

Also Germany has restrictions on abortion after 12 weeks.

[kalm]

Says the guy who more than likely been aborted in today's society.

Also Germany has restrictions on abortion after 12 weeks.

Well didn’t Germany lead the 20th century in eugenics?

[Winterborn]

Says the guy who more than likely been aborted in today's society.

Also Germany has restrictions on abortion after 12 weeks.

Well didn’t Germany lead the 20th century in eugenics?

Depends on how you define a human.

[Ibanez]

Says the guy who more than likely been aborted in today's society.

Also Germany has restrictions on abortion after 12 weeks.

Well didn’t Germany lead the 20th century in eugenics?

Yes - but they got the idea from the USA. The Nuremburg Laws used the racial laws of the USA as a model. Didn't the Rockefellers even fund most of Germany's programs?

[Baldy]

i'm fine if this Supreme Court overturns Roe and picks this Summer to do it. i think the Constitution should be interpreted according to an honest effort to apply any Constitutional language as it was generally understood when it was understood when it was generated. i never thought Roe did that. Also, i am a "live begins at conception" person.

Meanwhile, we need something to change the dynamic if we want to avoid having the Republican Party from taking control of the legislative Branch. While we don't know if a Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe would do that, it could. Notably, there are already Republicans in the Federal legislative branch talking about making a national abortion prohibition if they take power. That gives something Democrats can focus on. "If the Republicans gain control, they will outlaw abortion everywhere."

There is at least potential that kind of thing could hurt Republicans in swing States and districts, because the majority of the population does not want Roe overturned and, I think, would not want to have Congress impose a national ban.

This gives Democrats a chance to cast the Republican base as the American Taliban. Might not work. But it's worth a shot.

It certainly won’t hurt Democratic enthusiasm. It will move done moderates left and the far left to the right.

Not really.

According to Gallup, it's basically a toss-up between pro life and pro choice generally. However, only about 30% believe abortion should be legal under any circumstance. This decision will paint the Donks into a corner to the point that they will have to define when life begins and how to frame any law regarding abortion. I see lots of teeth gnashing and tap dancing ahead.

[CAA Flagship]

Wait a minute...wasn't the leftist joke for years that if men could have babies, abortions would be legal everywhere?

Spoiler: show

I had that in there when I originally started my post and deleted it hoping someone would remember that.

I caught the last half of that over the weekend.

[GannonFan]

It certainly won’t hurt Democratic enthusiasm. It will move done moderates left and the far left to the right.

Not really.

According to Gallup, it's basically a toss-up between pro life and pro choice generally. However, only about 30% believe abortion should be legal under any circumstance. This decision will paint the Donks into a corner to the point that they will have to define when life begins and how to frame any law regarding abortion. I see lots of teeth gnashing and tap dancing ahead.

I'm not sure people will really come out for abortion, or at least in enough on one side to sway anything. There are fierce abortion rights voters and they are about equally balanced with fierce pro-life voters, and then there's just everyone else. Even with a Supreme Court ruling I don't really see that changing. The states that will go with the ruling have already made abortions difficult in their states, and have done so over multiple years, and the states that will keep abortion legal already have that baked into their laws anyway. No doubt it's a big deal, I just don't see large enough voting blocs on one side or the other of the issue to make an electoral difference, especially in midterms. Elections are always local, and even more so in midterms. People will be looking at the economy and how they're doing. Abortion isn't going to make inflation go away.

[AZGrizFan]

It certainly won’t hurt Democratic enthusiasm. It will move done moderates left and the far left to the right.

Not really.

According to Gallup, it's basically a toss-up between pro life and pro choice generally. However, only about 30% believe abortion should be legal under any circumstance. This decision will paint the Donks into a corner to the point that they will have to define when life begins and how to frame any law regarding abortion. I see lots of teeth gnashing and tap dancing ahead.

They’ll have to start with defining what a “Woman” is.

[Winterborn]

Not really.

According to Gallup, it's basically a toss-up between pro life and pro choice generally. However, only about 30% believe abortion should be legal under any circumstance. This decision will paint the Donks into a corner to the point that they will have to define when life begins and how to frame any law regarding abortion. I see lots of teeth gnashing and tap dancing ahead.

They’ll have to start with defining what a “Woman” is.

And that will be hilarious to watch on Twitter/MSNBC.

[AZGrizFan]

They’ll have to start with defining what a “Woman” is.

And that will be hilarious to watch on Twitter/MSNBC.

Then, since they’ve determined men can menstruate and have babies, we now get an equal say.

[Winterborn]

And that will be hilarious to watch on Twitter/MSNBC.

Then, since they’ve determined men can menstruate and have babies, we now get an equal say.

Hopefully that means we can get child support from them as well then.

[HI54UNI]

Spoiler: show

I had that in there when I originally started my post and deleted it hoping someone would remember that.

I caught the last half of that over the weekend.

So did I. That's why it was fresh in my head.

[Skjellyfetti]

Then, since they’ve determined men can menstruate and have babies, we now get an equal say.

Hopefully that means we can get child support from them as well then.

And start collecting at conception

[BDKJMU]

Pocahontas calls on people to fight..


People in LA respond:




Looks like Pocahontas should be charged for inciting an insurrection..

[CAA Flagship]

Looks like Pocahontas should be charged for inciting an insurrection..

SHAVE HER HEAD!!!!!

[kalm]

[UNI88]

What if my seminal vesicle self-identifies as a uterus?

[CAA Flagship]

What if my seminal vesicle self-identifies as a uterus?

Rotate the tires, change the oil, start driving, and begin playing Led Zeppelin IV at 3/4 volume.

[AZGrizFan]

Sorry, but when they can’t define a “woman”, and insist men can menstruate and have babies, it’s a whole new world.

[kalm]

Sorry, but when they can’t define a “woman”, and insist men can menstruate and have babies, it’s a whole new world.

Who’s they?

[AZGrizFan]

Sorry, but when they can’t define a “woman”, and insist men can menstruate and have babies, it’s a whole new world.

Who’s they?

Lol. You’re funny.

[kalm]

Who’s they?

Lol. You’re funny.

Seriously…who are you referring to as they?

[kalm]

So I guess this is a thing…