The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Political discussions
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by JohnStOnge »

css75 wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
It's not week to week. This is a trend over a month since the Whistleblower report was released. Yes, one has to be cognizant of the fact that there is noise. But you can indeed see how different things are playing with the public. For example: One could tell from the polls that Trump was losing the PR battle over the late 2018/early 2019 government shutdown. And one can tell from the polls that Trump is losing the PR battle now.

Trump actually beat Clinton among independents in 2016. Right now the majority of independents think he should be impeached and removed from office. He's not doing well.

Of course, things can change. People in the middle swish back and forth all the time. Right now, though, his approach is not working.

You are right,it isn’t week to week, it is any poll out there at anytime that is anti Trump.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not at all. As I wrote long ago: I do not kid myself when the polls something I wish were not true. The quality polls are by far the best information we have on where public opinion is on any particular issue or person at any particular time. Below is a table showing how the Real Clear Politics margins for national races have compared to actual margins 2006 through 2018. "Bias" is the average of the differences (Democrats minus Republicans) indicated by the final Real Clear Politics Average of polls and the actual differences. Perfectly unbiased would be 0 and you can see that the calculated bias is very close to that at -0.01. Simple Average Error is the average of the absolute values of the difference so it gives the average of how far off each polling average was regardless of whether it was negative or positive. You can see that it is 2.01.

Note that the overall national average for the 2016 election was off by 1.2 percentage points, which is LESS than the overall average of 2.01 for the period. That alone tells you that the idea that there was some kind of historically bad poll performance in 2016 is complete nonsense.

Also, you can see that the maximum extent to which the polling average over estimated Democrat performance is 3.2 percentage points (2012) while the maximum extent to which the polling average over estimated Republican performance is 3.6 percentage points (2006). That gives you an idea as to the extremes with respect to how far off the Real Clear Politics average might be.

So when you see something like the situation we have now where Trump is 13.4 percentage points under water in the Real Clear Politics job approval polling average you can take it to the bank that he is clearly underwater to a substantial degree. At least something like 10 percentage points and possibly up to something like 16 percentage points.

Image
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by JohnStOnge »

css75 wrote:You are right,it isn’t week to week, it is any poll out there at anytime that is anti Trump.
As I wrote I don't kid myself. I am confident that I know how to interpret polls and I won't lie to myself if, for instance, the polls appear to indicate that Trump got a bump up due to the US military getting Baghdadi. I am hoping not but if I had to bet I'd bet he will. But if he gets a bump up I'm not going to kid myself and ascribe it to something being wrong with the polls.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25090
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by houndawg »

SDHornet wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:Good lord. Caring what the polls say week to week is absolutely retarded.
Shut up you, it worked for hillary.


Oh wait...
+3,000,000.


Oh, wait...
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Ivytalk »

JohnStOnge wrote:
css75 wrote:You are right,it isn’t week to week, it is any poll out there at anytime that is anti Trump.
As I wrote I don't kid myself. I am confident that I know how to interpret polls and I won't lie to myself if, for instance, the polls appear to indicate that Trump got a bump up due to the US military getting Baghdadi. I am hoping not but if I had to bet I'd bet he will. But if he gets a bump up I'm not going to kid myself and ascribe it to something being wrong with the polls.
I’ll ascribe it to the economy.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
Winterborn
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8812
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:33 pm
I am a fan of: Beer and Diesel Pickups
Location: Wherever I hang my hat

Re: RE: Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Winterborn »

JohnStOnge wrote:
css75 wrote:

You are right,it isn’t week to week, it is any poll out there at anytime that is anti Trump.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Not at all. As I wrote long ago: I do not kid myself when the polls something I wish were not true. The quality polls are by far the best information we have on where public opinion is on any particular issue or person at any particular time. Below is a table showing how the Real Clear Politics margins for national races have compared to actual margins 2006 through 2018. "Bias" is the average of the differences (Democrats minus Republicans) indicated by the final Real Clear Politics Average of polls and the actual differences. Perfectly unbiased would be 0 and you can see that the calculated bias is very close to that at -0.01. Simple Average Error is the average of the absolute values of the difference so it gives the average of how far off each polling average was regardless of whether it was negative or positive. You can see that it is 2.01.

Note that the overall national average for the 2016 election was off by 1.2 percentage points, which is LESS than the overall average of 2.01 for the period. That alone tells you that the idea that there was some kind of historically bad poll performance in 2016 is complete nonsense.

Also, you can see that the maximum extent to which the polling average over estimated Democrat performance is 3.2 percentage points (2012) while the maximum extent to which the polling average over estimated Republican performance is 3.6 percentage points (2006). That gives you an idea as to the extremes with respect to how far off the Real Clear Politics average might be.

So when you see something like the situation we have now where Trump is 13.4 percentage points under water in the Real Clear Politics job approval polling average you can take it to the bank that he is clearly underwater to a substantial degree. At least something like 10 percentage points and possibly up to something like 16 percentage points.

Image
Image
“The best of all things is to learn. Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.” – Louis L’Amour

“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf

"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by AZGrizFan »

JohnStOnge wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:Good lord. Caring what the polls say week to week is absolutely retarded.
It's not week to week. This is a trend over a month since the Whistleblower report was released. Yes, one has to be cognizant of the fact that there is noise. But you can indeed see how different things are playing with the public. For example: One could tell from the polls that Trump was losing the PR battle over the late 2018/early 2019 government shutdown. And one can tell from the polls that Trump is losing the PR battle now.

Trump actually beat Clinton among independents in 2016. Right now the majority of independents think he should be impeached and removed from office. He's not doing well.

Of course, things can change. People in the middle swish back and forth all the time. Right now, though, his approach is not working.
His “disapproval rating” hasn’t moved from between 42-45 for 18 months. What’s the margin of error for this poll?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14677
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Army Officer on White House Staff Reported Concerns on Trump’s Ukraine Dealings

The top Ukraine expert at the White House will tell impeachment investigators he twice reported concerns about President Trump’s pressure tactics on Ukraine, acting out of a “sense of duty.”

A White House national security official who is a decorated Iraq war veteran plans to tell House impeachment investigators on Tuesday that he heard President Trump appeal to Ukraine’s president to investigate one of his leading political rivals, a request the aide considered so damaging to American interests that he reported it to a superior.

Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman of the Army, the top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, twice registered internal objections about how Mr. Trump and his inner circle were treating Ukraine, out of what he called a “sense of duty,” he plans to tell the inquiry, according to a draft of his opening statement obtained by The New York Times.

He will be the first White House official to testify who listened in on the July 25 telephone call between Mr. Trump and President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine that is at the center of the impeachment inquiry, in which Mr. Trump asked Mr. Zelensky to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

“I did not think it was proper to demand that a foreign government investigate a U.S. citizen, and I was worried about the implications for the U.S. government’s support of Ukraine,” Colonel Vindman said in his statement. “I realized that if Ukraine pursued an investigation into the Bidens and Burisma it would likely be interpreted as a partisan play which would undoubtedly result in Ukraine losing the bipartisan support it has thus far maintained.”

Burisma Holdings is an energy company on whose board Mr. Biden’s son served while his father was vice president.

“This would all undermine U.S. national security,” Colonel Vindman added, referring to Mr. Trump’s comments in the call.

The colonel, a Ukrainian-American immigrant who received a Purple Heart after being wounded in Iraq by a roadside bomb and whose statement is full of references to duty and patriotism, could be a more difficult witness to dismiss than his civilian counterparts.

“I am a patriot,” Colonel Vindman plans to tell the investigators, “and it is my sacred duty and honor to advance and defend our country irrespective of party or politics.”

He was to be interviewed privately on Tuesday by the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight and Reform Committees, in defiance of a White House edict not to cooperate with the impeachment inquiry.

The colonel, who is represented by Michael Volkov, a former federal prosecutor, declined to comment for this article.

In his testimony, Colonel Vindman plans to say that he is not the whistle-blower who initially reported Mr. Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine. But he will provide an account that corroborates and fleshes out crucial elements in that complaint, which prompted Democrats to open their impeachment investigation.

“I did convey certain concerns internally to national security officials in accordance with my decades of experience and training, sense of duty, and obligation to operate within the chain of command,” he plans to say.

He will testify that he watched with alarm as “outside influencers” began pushing a “false narrative” about Ukraine that was counter to the consensus view of American national security officials, and harmful to United States interests. According to documents reviewed by The Times on the eve of his congressional testimony, Colonel Vindman was concerned as he discovered that Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, was leading an effort to prod Kiev to investigate Mr. Biden’s son, and to discredit efforts to investigate Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, and his business dealings in Ukraine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/28/us/p ... -ios-share
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Ivytalk »

Peter Venkman > Alexander Vindman
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Ibanez »

Vindman, someone who was on the July call and has been in other meetings, does not paint a pretty picture.

I'm sure Republicans will attack the substance and not the character of the man. Just like they've done all along.


Oh wait...they haven't
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Ibanez »

Ivytalk wrote:Peter Venkman > Alexander Vindman
Venkman was cooler.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30131
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by UNI88 »

Ibanez wrote:
Ivytalk wrote:Peter Venkman > Alexander Vindman
Venkman was cooler.
"Let’s show this prehistoric b!tch how we do things downtown."
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by CitadelGrad »

Ibanez wrote:Vindman, someone who was on the July call and has been in other meetings, does not paint a pretty picture.

I'm sure Republicans will attack the substance and not the character of the man. Just like they've done all along.


Oh wait...they haven't
You know, there is actually a publicly available transcript of the call. Vindman is doing nothing more than talking about his feelings about the call. The actual substance of the call can be found in the aforementioned transcript.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14677
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Skjellyfetti »

It's not a transcript. Says so right on the document.

And, it's about much more than a single phone call.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30131
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: Sailing the Gulf of Mexico

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by UNI88 »

UNI88 wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Venkman was cooler.
"Let’s show this prehistoric b!tch how we do things downtown."
WOW! Venkman predicted Trump's victory over Hillary!
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm

MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.

Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18936
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by SeattleGriz »

Skjellyfetti wrote:It's not a transcript. Says so right on the document.

And, it's about much more than a single phone call.
Definition of transcript
1a: a written, printed, or typed copy
especially : a usually typed copy of dictated or recorded material
b: an official or legal and often published copy
a court reporter's transcript
I again will point out it IS a transcript, even though it says memorandum on the document. You're trying to say it is not word for word.

Just trying to keep this from going where "collusion" went. Was okay at first, even though many pointed out Trump couldn't be brought up on collusion. Then, after the Mueller dud, it wasn't okay to say because Trump couldn't be brought up on collusion.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14677
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Just going off what the document says. I'm sorry if you feel the CAUTION block was unnecessary.
Skjellyfetti wrote:Image
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18936
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by SeattleGriz »

Skjellyfetti wrote:Just going off what the document says. I'm sorry if you feel the CAUTION block was unnecessary.
Skjellyfetti wrote:Image
;)

It's still a transcript, just not a verbatim transcript. :ugeek:
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14677
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Skjellyfetti »

begs the question... why not release the verbatim transcript? :coffee:
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 68746
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by kalm »

SeattleGriz wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:Just going off what the document says. I'm sorry if you feel the CAUTION block was unnecessary.
;)

It's still a transcript, just not a verbatim transcript. :ugeek:
There can be a world of difference between a memorandum and a transcript. Who wrote the memorandum?
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
JohnStOnge
Egalitarian
Egalitarian
Posts: 20316
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
I am a fan of: McNeese State
A.K.A.: JohnStOnge

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by JohnStOnge »

AZGrizFan wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:
It's not week to week. This is a trend over a month since the Whistleblower report was released. Yes, one has to be cognizant of the fact that there is noise. But you can indeed see how different things are playing with the public. For example: One could tell from the polls that Trump was losing the PR battle over the late 2018/early 2019 government shutdown. And one can tell from the polls that Trump is losing the PR battle now.

Trump actually beat Clinton among independents in 2016. Right now the majority of independents think he should be impeached and removed from office. He's not doing well.

Of course, things can change. People in the middle swish back and forth all the time. Right now, though, his approach is not working.
His “disapproval rating” hasn’t moved from between 42-45 for 18 months. What’s the margin of error for this poll?
I don't know what you're talking about. His "disapproval rating" in the Real Clear Politics average of polls has been above 50% since March 19, 2017. The guy is underwater.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?

Deep Purple: No One Came
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by AZGrizFan »

JohnStOnge wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
His “disapproval rating” hasn’t moved from between 42-45 for 18 months. What’s the margin of error for this poll?
I don't know what you're talking about. His "disapproval rating" in the Real Clear Politics average of polls has been above 50% since March 19, 2017. The guy is underwater.
Sorry. His APPROVAL rating has been in the range I mentioned for 18 months. What is the margin of error for this poll?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by CID1990 »

JohnStOnge wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
His “disapproval rating” hasn’t moved from between 42-45 for 18 months. What’s the margin of error for this poll?
I don't know what you're talking about. His "disapproval rating" in the Real Clear Politics average of polls has been above 50% since March 19, 2017. The guy is underwater.
His disapproval rating was pretty bad in 2016 and yet somehow he’s your President

It must have been all those Russian trolls changing everybody’s minds


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 18936
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by SeattleGriz »

kalm wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:
;)

It's still a transcript, just not a verbatim transcript. :ugeek:
There can be a world of difference between a memorandum and a transcript. Who wrote the memorandum?
I don't know. Sure bet they wish they could access the conversation on the super secret drive that only Trump knows about. 4D chess.
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Ibanez »

CitadelGrad wrote:
Ibanez wrote:Vindman, someone who was on the July call and has been in other meetings, does not paint a pretty picture.

I'm sure Republicans will attack the substance and not the character of the man. Just like they've done all along.


Oh wait...they haven't
You know, there is actually a publicly available transcript of the call. Vindman is doing nothing more than talking about his feelings about the call. The actual substance of the call can be found in the aforementioned transcript.
Yeah - where in the text POTUS says
The· President: I would like you to do us a favor though
after being told Ukraine would like weapons. Sounds shady to me.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

Post by Ibanez »

UNI88 wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Venkman was cooler.
"Let’s show this prehistoric b!tch how we do things downtown."
:lol: What a good movie.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Post Reply