We should not be executing those society has abandoned. We are all at fault for crime.
Discuss.



I guess the USA does has limits on who's worth saving.Cap'n Cat wrote:Been a while. I'll start.
We should not be executing those society has abandoned. We are all at fault for crime.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Discuss.


I don't disagree with the premise of this thread...but your reasoning is bat-shit crazy...Cap'n Cat wrote:Been a while. I'll start.
We should not be executing those society has abandoned. We are all at fault for crime.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Discuss.




bobbythekidd wrote:Some people just need killing.


Well if Alphie agrees, I need to change my opinion. The death penalty gives too much power to the state. It doesn't serve as a deterant to crime or else none of the crimes would have been committed in the first place. Boooo death penalty!ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:bobbythekidd wrote:Some people just need killing.
This thread should be locked after the post above.
Epic brilliance

bobbythekidd wrote: The death penalty gives too much power to the state. It doesn't serve as a deterant to crime or else none of the crimes would have been committed in the first place. Boooo death penalty!



You're right, killing unborn innocent babies, killing murdering bastards....its all the same.Cap'n Cat wrote:When we, as a nation stop executing people, then, and only then, might I give some time to the anti-choice mobs. Until then, it's all hypocritical bullsh*t.
![]()
![]()

This is the problem. Plus it costs way too much. Isolation for life sucks way worse.Chizzang wrote:All I gotta say is: DON'T get framed..!!!
University of Texas studies show historically about 6% of death row inmates are not guilty...
Since 1982 Texas has executed about 450 people...
U.T. has surmised that dozens of inmates presently on death row in Texas are actually not guilty of the crime they are scheduled to die for...
I repeat: Do not get framed...


Death is the easy way outslycat wrote: Isolation for life sucks way worse.



+1BlueHen86 wrote:I am against the death penalty. I'd rather see them get life with no chance or parole, they should also have a spartan existance - no weights, no TV or radio, no telephone or mail or communication with the outside world. They can read books, that is about it.

Yeah, it would get rid of the endless appeals that do nothing more than make lawyers rich.HI54UNI wrote:+1BlueHen86 wrote:I am against the death penalty. I'd rather see them get life with no chance or parole, they should also have a spartan existance - no weights, no TV or radio, no telephone or mail or communication with the outside world. They can read books, that is about it.
Doing that would be cheaper for the taxpayers too.

I liked your first post better, bobby. I don't give a rats ass if the death penalty isn't a deterent to crime. Kill those motherfuckers so they can't repeat their acts. Period.Col Hogan wrote:bobbythekidd wrote: The death penalty gives too much power to the state. It doesn't serve as a deterant to crime or else none of the crimes would have been committed in the first place. Boooo death penalty!



Alright, whatever you say, Bob Fuckface.bobbythekidd wrote:It's Bob fuckface.




Love the fetus, hate the child.Cap'n Cat wrote:When we, as a nation stop executing people, then, and only then, might I give some time to the anti-choice mobs. Until then, it's all hypocritical bullsh*t.
![]()
![]()