Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 10:25 pm
Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=10335
Page 1 of 1
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 5:11 am
It shows that the incompetence level of Republicans in NY is still alive and kicking.
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:36 am
Some good news.
So, was THIS a referendum on Obama? On conservatives?
So, was THIS a referendum on Obama? On conservatives?
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:41 am
Sign of a free country, where the people can vote for who they want.dbackjon wrote:Some good news.
So, was THIS a referendum on Obama? On conservatives?
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:46 am
UNHWildCats wrote:
And heavily democratic New Jersey elected a big dolt Rupublican just because everyone hated John Corzine. Sometimes a poor or strong individual can overcome histroical patterns.
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:25 am
New Jersey has a history of electing republican governors. Since 1947 6 of the 13 elected governors of NJ were republicans.Franks Tanks wrote:UNHWildCats wrote:
And heavily democratic New Jersey elected a big dolt Rupublican just because everyone hated John Corzine. Sometimes a poor or strong individual can overcome histroical patterns.
The problem with democrats is they are to blinded to vote out an incumbent in a primary or to pick the stronger candidate because they have some dislike for him or her. NJ voters would have been better served having someone other then Corzine as the democratic nominee. Voters in NJ yesterday wish they had other choices... Unfortunatly for Corzine, more voters disliked him then Christie.
In Virginia, democrats would have been better served nominating McAullife, while he may not have won, he would have had a better chance and would have atleast made it a closer race.
In NYC, democrats could have defeated Bloomberg had John Liu or Anthony Weiner not opted out of the race.
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:29 am
Whoop-de-freakin'-do! This district will likely disappear after reapportionment next year. 
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:42 am
I think like a alot of districts this will maybe come back to the GOP next year.
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:53 am
Gil Dobie wrote:Sign of a free country, where the people can vote for who they want.dbackjon wrote:Some good news.
So, was THIS a referendum on Obama? On conservatives?
We agree, you old fart.
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:54 am
If anything, a referendum on the RNC....dbackjon wrote:Some good news.
So, was THIS a referendum on Obama? On conservatives?
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:54 am
Franks Tanks wrote:UNHWildCats wrote:
And heavily democratic New Jersey elected a big dolt Rupublican just because everyone hated John Corzine. Sometimes a poor or strong individual can overcome histroical patterns.
Agreed, if you're bad, you're out. Shoulda been the case with Reagan and Bush and Jesse Helms, but..............
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:09 pm
Shocking. New York is becoming more liberal.
They're finally figuring out if you elect democrats you don't have to work and you get more free shit.
They're finally figuring out if you elect democrats you don't have to work and you get more free shit.
Re: Democrats Win NY-23 For First Time In 100 Years
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:14 pm
Maybe more of a referendum on the back room county party machinery in New York State.Appaholic wrote:If anything, a referendum on the RNC....dbackjon wrote:Some good news.
So, was THIS a referendum on Obama? On conservatives?
...and probably a cautionary tale for both conservative Republican overreaching and arrogance, and liberal (NOT "moderate") Republican dishonesty and arrogance.