Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Political discussions
Post Reply
hank scorpio
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:55 am
I am a fan of: UM

Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by hank scorpio »

Area Man Passionate Defender Of What He Imagines Constitution To Be

ESCONDIDO, CA—Spurred by an administration he believes to be guilty of numerous transgressions, self-described American patriot Kyle Mortensen, 47, is a vehement defender of ideas he seems to think are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and principles that brave men have fought and died for solely in his head.

Image
Kyle Mortensen would gladly give his life to protect what he says is the Constitution's very clear stance against birth control.

"Our very way of life is under siege," said Mortensen, whose understanding of the Constitution derives not from a close reading of the document but from talk-show pundits, books by television personalities, and the limitless expanse of his own colorful imagination. "It's time for true Americans to stand up and protect the values that make us who we are."

According to Mortensen—an otherwise mild-mannered husband, father, and small-business owner—the most serious threat to his fanciful version of the 222-year-old Constitution is the attempt by far-left "traitors" to strip it of its religious foundation.

"Right there in the preamble, the authors make their priorities clear: 'one nation under God,'" said Mortensen, attributing to the Constitution a line from the Pledge of Allegiance, which itself did not include any reference to a deity until 1954. "Well, there's a reason they put that right at the top."

"Men like Madison and Jefferson were moved by the ideals of Christianity, and wanted the United States to reflect those values as a Christian nation," continued Mortensen, referring to the "Father of the Constitution," James Madison, considered by many historians to be an atheist, and Thomas Jefferson, an Enlightenment-era thinker who rejected the divinity of Christ and was in France at the time the document was written. "The words on the page speak for themselves."

According to sources who have read the nation's charter, the U.S. Constitution and its 27 amendments do not contain the word "God" or "Christ."

Mortensen said his admiration for the loose assemblage of vague half-notions he calls the Constitution has only grown over time. He believes that each detail he has pulled from thin air—from prohibitions on sodomy and flag-burning, to mandatory crackdowns on immigrants, to the right of citizens not to have their hard-earned income confiscated in the form of taxes—has contributed to making it the best framework for governance "since the Ten Commandments."

"And let's not forget that when the Constitution was ratified it brought freedom to every single American," Mortensen said.

Mortensen's passion for safeguarding the elaborate fantasy world in which his conception of the Constitution resides is greatly respected by his likeminded friends and relatives, many of whom have been known to repeat his unfounded assertions verbatim when angered. Still, some friends and family members remain critical.

"Dad's great, but listening to all that talk radio has put some weird ideas into his head," said daughter Samantha, a freshman at Reed College in Portland, OR. "He believes the Constitution allows the government to torture people and ban gay marriage, yet he doesn't even know that it guarantees universal health care."

Mortensen told reporters that he'll fight until the bitter end for what he roughly supposes the Constitution to be. He acknowledged, however, that it might already be too late to win the battle.

"The freedoms our Founding Fathers spilled their blood for are vanishing before our eyes," Mortensen said. "In under a year, a fascist, socialist regime has turned a proud democracy into a totalitarian state that will soon control every facet of American life."

"Don't just take my word for it," Mortensen added. "Try reading a newspaper or watching the news sometime."

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/ar ... efender_of

8-)
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by Appaholic »

It's so funny, because it's so true....
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20856
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by SuperHornet »

As a conservative Christian, I agree that the Constitution guarantees us certain things that liberals are seeking to erode every day through legislation and activist courts stepping into the legislature's role. However, I don't believe that the Constitution says half the things this guy is purporting it to. Nut jobs like this guy give the conservative movement a bad name....
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
hank scorpio
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1878
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:55 am
I am a fan of: UM

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by hank scorpio »

SuperHornet wrote:As a conservative Christian, I agree that the Constitution guarantees us certain things that liberals are seeking to erode every day through legislation and activist courts stepping into the legislature's role. However, I don't believe that the Constitution says half the things this guy is purporting it to. Nut jobs like this guy give the conservative movement a bad name....
:rofl:
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by bandl »

I can't tell.........which part of this thread is a joke and which isn't?
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by mainejeff »

bandl wrote:I can't tell.........which part of this thread is a joke and which isn't?
I can't either. :|
Go Black Bears!
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by CitadelGrad »

Everyone knows that Jesus wrote the Constitution. Jeezus!
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by Ivytalk »

The Onion! I knew it! :lol:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by travelinman67 »

:ohno: SMFH...

The first two sentences in the Declaration of Independence...
hen in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
...no reference to God in the constitution, though referenced in 37 state's constitutions, and the leading sentences in the Declaration of Independence (as well as most of John Locke and Thomas Mason's force du majeur)

...dickhead Dems... :ohno:
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by bandl »

THE ONION!!!!!
GSUAlumniEagle
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:20 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by GSUAlumniEagle »

SuperHornet wrote:As a conservative Christian, I agree that the Constitution guarantees us certain things that liberals are seeking to erode every day through legislation and activist courts stepping into the legislature's role. However, I don't believe that the Constitution says half the things this guy is purporting it to. Nut jobs like this guy give the conservative movement a bad name....
Can't. Stop. Laughing. Please post often. You are my hero!

You do understand that legislature and "activist courts" were created by the Constitution, don't you? Are you really so naive to believe that the framers honestly believed that the Constitution could serve alone as the country's only founding document?
...no reference to God in the constitution, though referenced in 37 state's constitutions, and the leading sentences in the Declaration of Independence (as well as most of John Locke and Thomas Mason's force du majeur)

...dickhead Dems... :ohno:
Too bad the Declaration of Independence was never intended to be a governing document. The Constitution WAS intended to be a governing document. The framers, in their wisdom, declared that we shouldn't have a nationalized religion. http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by dbackjon »

Welcome GSUAlum
:thumb:
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by bandl »

THE ONION GODDAMMIT!
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by BlueHen86 »

GSUAlumniEagle wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:As a conservative Christian, I agree that the Constitution guarantees us certain things that liberals are seeking to erode every day through legislation and activist courts stepping into the legislature's role. However, I don't believe that the Constitution says half the things this guy is purporting it to. Nut jobs like this guy give the conservative movement a bad name....
Can't. Stop. Laughing. Please post often. You are my hero!

You do understand that legislature and "activist courts" were created by the Constitution, don't you? Are you really so naive to believe that the framers honestly believed that the Constitution could serve alone as the country's only founding document?
...no reference to God in the constitution, though referenced in 37 state's constitutions, and the leading sentences in the Declaration of Independence (as well as most of John Locke and Thomas Mason's force du majeur)

...dickhead Dems... :ohno:
Too bad the Declaration of Independence was never intended to be a governing document. The Constitution WAS intended to be a governing document. The framers, in their wisdom, declared that we shouldn't have a nationalized religion. http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html
Good post. :thumb:
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by danefan »

Image
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by andy7171 »

SuperHornet wrote:As a conservative Christian, I agree that the Constitution guarantees us certain things that liberals are seeking to erode every day through legislation and activist courts stepping into the legislature's role. However, I don't believe that the Constitution says half the things this guy is purporting it to. Nut jobs like this guy give the conservative movement a bad name....
:? :?

:rofl:
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by AZGrizFan »

bandl wrote:THE ONION GODDAMMIT!

Give it up, man. They're on a roll. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by BlueHen86 »

AZGrizFan wrote:
bandl wrote:THE ONION GODDAMMIT!

Give it up, man. They're on a roll. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
Would that be an onion roll?
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by bandl »

BlueHen86 wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:

Give it up, man. They're on a roll. :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
Would that be an onion roll?
HEYYYYYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by AZGrizFan »

bandl wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Would that be an onion roll?
HEYYYYYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rimshot! :lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by CitadelGrad »

GSUAlumniEagle wrote:You do understand that legislature and "activist courts" were created by the Constitution, don't you? Are you really so naive to believe that the framers honestly believed that the Constitution could serve alone as the country's only founding document?
You do understand that the authors of the Constitution did not create activist courts, don't you? You do understand that the courts were intended to have very limited powers, don't you? You do understand courts were not intended to legislate or amend the Constitution, don't you? You do understand that the Constitution clearly separates powers between the three branches of the government, don't you? You do understand that there is a clearly described method for amending the Constitution and it is found withing the Constitution, don't you?
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20856
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by SuperHornet »

CitadelGrad wrote:
GSUAlumniEagle wrote:You do understand that legislature and "activist courts" were created by the Constitution, don't you? Are you really so naive to believe that the framers honestly believed that the Constitution could serve alone as the country's only founding document?
You do understand that the authors of the Constitution did not create activist courts, don't you? You do understand that the courts were intended to have very limited powers, don't you? You do understand courts were not intended to legislate or amend the Constitution, don't you? You do understand that the Constitution clearly separates powers between the three branches of the government, don't you? You do understand that there is a clearly described method for amending the Constitution and it is found withing the Constitution, don't you?
#clap
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25486
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by CID1990 »

I think that the portion of the Declaration of Independence that refers to inalienable rights endowed by the Creator serves as a preamble to the idea that would later become the Constitution. The idea is an old one from the Enlightenment and it also has some Masonic roots, as well.

IN short, it means that human rights are neither granted nor guaranteed by government. The U.S. Constitution does not grant us any rights at all. The U.S. Constitution outlines those things that the U.S. Government cannot do. It is literally a document of limitation for our government. Too many people think that our rights are granted by the document itself, but this is a photonegative of the actual purpose and function.

In the 18th century (as well as before and after), certain human rights were considered to be sacrosanct and inviolable. These rights are afforded to us simply by the fact that we exist as human beings. Hence, the "endowed by our Creator" line. By saying that those rights were granted to us by God made them inviolable. This was the most powerful language available to the Founding Fathers. It is a statement of humanity, not religion.

I personally do not believe (as do many conservative constitutional scholars) that the U.S. Constitution is a contract with (or between) the Christian God and the American people. It is a contract that binds our government. Think of it as a "27 Commandments" to the government. With this in mind, I do not think that judicial rulings such as the ones that prohibit the Ten Commandments from being displayed in government buildings is an erosion of the document. Although somewhat miniscule, these rulings ARE in the spirit of the document. I think that it is a petty use of judicial time, but certainly not an attack on what is and always has been a secular Republic. In fact, in many ways, constitutional rulings that appear on the surface to be anti-religion are some of the more constitutionally sound decisions judges make. Quite frankly, if Detroit one day decides to put Koranic verses on courtroom walls (not impossible in say, 100 years given the growing demographics there) I would be raising Hell about it and I would be right. For the same reason that the atheists and the Hindus and the Secular Humanists are right when they raise Hell now.

When it comes to being upset about bending or trashing the COnstitution, I think we have many more glowing examples to worry about than supposed attacks on religion. Consfiscatory taxation, mandatory arrests for certain offenses, racial and gender discrimination through quotas, 'hate' crimes legislation, Federal enforcement of laws created extra-Constitutionally for issues reserved to the States, etc etc etc. These things are much more alarming to me than not being able to stop and ponder a plaque of the Ten Commandments in a courthouse lobby. I'm a practicing Christian, but I don't need a plaque to remind me of how to act, and I don't need revisionist reminders by people who think that the U.S. Constitution is a Christian document. It is Caesar's document.

I think most of the Founding Fathers would agree.


(Oh, and BTW- the article that started the thread is from The Onion.......lol)
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: Area Man Passionate Defender Constitution

Post by BlueHen86 »

CID1990 wrote:I think that the portion of the Declaration of Independence that refers to inalienable rights endowed by the Creator serves as a preamble to the idea that would later become the Constitution. The idea is an old one from the Enlightenment and it also has some Masonic roots, as well.

IN short, it means that human rights are neither granted nor guaranteed by government. The U.S. Constitution does not grant us any rights at all. The U.S. Constitution outlines those things that the U.S. Government cannot do. It is literally a document of limitation for our government. Too many people think that our rights are granted by the document itself, but this is a photonegative of the actual purpose and function.

In the 18th century (as well as before and after), certain human rights were considered to be sacrosanct and inviolable. These rights are afforded to us simply by the fact that we exist as human beings. Hence, the "endowed by our Creator" line. By saying that those rights were granted to us by God made them inviolable. This was the most powerful language available to the Founding Fathers. It is a statement of humanity, not religion.

I personally do not believe (as do many conservative constitutional scholars) that the U.S. Constitution is a contract with (or between) the Christian God and the American people. It is a contract that binds our government. Think of it as a "27 Commandments" to the government. With this in mind, I do not think that judicial rulings such as the ones that prohibit the Ten Commandments from being displayed in government buildings is an erosion of the document. Although somewhat miniscule, these rulings ARE in the spirit of the document. I think that it is a petty use of judicial time, but certainly not an attack on what is and always has been a secular Republic. In fact, in many ways, constitutional rulings that appear on the surface to be anti-religion are some of the more constitutionally sound decisions judges make. Quite frankly, if Detroit one day decides to put Koranic verses on courtroom walls (not impossible in say, 100 years given the growing demographics there) I would be raising Hell about it and I would be right. For the same reason that the atheists and the Hindus and the Secular Humanists are right when they raise Hell now.

When it comes to being upset about bending or trashing the COnstitution, I think we have many more glowing examples to worry about than supposed attacks on religion. Consfiscatory taxation, mandatory arrests for certain offenses, racial and gender discrimination through quotas, 'hate' crimes legislation, Federal enforcement of laws created extra-Constitutionally for issues reserved to the States, etc etc etc. These things are much more alarming to me than not being able to stop and ponder a plaque of the Ten Commandments in a courthouse lobby. I'm a practicing Christian, but I don't need a plaque to remind me of how to act, and I don't need revisionist reminders by people who think that the U.S. Constitution is a Christian document. It is Caesar's document.

I think most of the Founding Fathers would agree.


(Oh, and BTW- the article that started the thread is from The Onion.......lol)
Good post. :thumb:
Post Reply