Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Taxes under Clinton 1999
Single making 30K - tax $8,400
Single making 50K - tax $14,000
Single making 75K - tax $23,250
Married making 60K - tax $16,800
Married making 75K - tax $21,000
Married making 125K - tax $38,750
Taxes under Bush 2008
Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $31,250
If you want to know just how effective the mainstream media is, it is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever, AND that Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton will save them. If any democrat is elected, ALL of them say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen. This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and they don't even know what happened.
Single making 30K - tax $8,400
Single making 50K - tax $14,000
Single making 75K - tax $23,250
Married making 60K - tax $16,800
Married making 75K - tax $21,000
Married making 125K - tax $38,750
Taxes under Bush 2008
Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K - tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $31,250
If you want to know just how effective the mainstream media is, it is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever, AND that Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton will save them. If any democrat is elected, ALL of them say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen. This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and they don't even know what happened.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45610
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Source?
Because honestly, for me, when the Bush "cuts" went into place, my tax bill didn't change by more than a few hundred.
Because honestly, for me, when the Bush "cuts" went into place, my tax bill didn't change by more than a few hundred.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Those are the base tax rates. Obviously, each individual situation is different depending on personal and/or itemized deductions.
Personally, I've seen huge tax returns every year Bush has been in office, beginning in 2000. Prior to that, my tax bill was fairly balanced, and I got back minor refunds or paid minor bills. I'm now up to 11 dependants claimed on my W-4 form, and STILL can't get the tax bill low enough on a per-paycheck basis to avoid $4,000+ returns at the end of the year.
Personally, I've seen huge tax returns every year Bush has been in office, beginning in 2000. Prior to that, my tax bill was fairly balanced, and I got back minor refunds or paid minor bills. I'm now up to 11 dependants claimed on my W-4 form, and STILL can't get the tax bill low enough on a per-paycheck basis to avoid $4,000+ returns at the end of the year.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
11 Dependents? Damn dude, are you Catholic or do you just bone like us?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
MarkCCU wrote:11 Dependents? Damn dude, are you Catholic or do you just bone like us?
I said 11 on my W-4, Einstein.
Try and keep up, will you?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet
- Posts: 20306
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
I understand "overestimating" dependents to keep yourself from giving the feds an interest-free loan. But isn't taking it THAT far at the very least a bit unethical, if not flat-out illegal?AZGrizFan wrote:Those are the base tax rates. Obviously, each individual situation is different depending on personal and/or itemized deductions.
Personally, I've seen huge tax returns every year Bush has been in office, beginning in 2000. Prior to that, my tax bill was fairly balanced, and I got back minor refunds or paid minor bills. I'm now up to 11 dependants claimed on my W-4 form, and STILL can't get the tax bill low enough on a per-paycheck basis to avoid $4,000+ returns at the end of the year.
Wow!
SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
How is it illegal? I say 11 dependents, and I STILL get back almost $3,000. What should be ILLEGAL is those fucks having an interest free loan from me for the entire year----EVERY year. It's complete BS.SuperHornet wrote:I understand "overestimating" dependents to keep yourself from giving the feds an interest-free loan. But isn't taking it THAT far at the very least a bit unethical, if not flat-out illegal?AZGrizFan wrote:Those are the base tax rates. Obviously, each individual situation is different depending on personal and/or itemized deductions.
Personally, I've seen huge tax returns every year Bush has been in office, beginning in 2000. Prior to that, my tax bill was fairly balanced, and I got back minor refunds or paid minor bills. I'm now up to 11 dependants claimed on my W-4 form, and STILL can't get the tax bill low enough on a per-paycheck basis to avoid $4,000+ returns at the end of the year.
Wow!
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- bobbythekidd
- Supporter
- Posts: 4716
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:58 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Southern
- A.K.A.: Bob dammit!!
- Location: Savannah GA
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
http://www.fairtax.orgAZGrizFan wrote:How is it illegal? I say 11 dependents, and I STILL get back almost $3,000. What should be ILLEGAL is those f**k[*] having an interest free loan from me for the entire year----EVERY year. It's complete BS.
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
On the W4 you are not claiming dependents you are claiming the number of withholding allowances you want to take (head of household, dependent, etc...) and if you are trying to lower the amount taken out of your check as you are always giving the money to the government to hold for you for the year then what is unethical about it if he is over paying anyway? He probably has a 401k and several other vehicles (rising property taxes, stock market losses, etc...) that allows him to take more withholding allowances and so forth. If you are in contact with your accountant and have a good estimate of how your taxes are going to work out at year end then taking more allowances would be a good strategy. Also if you pay your taxes at the end of the year even if you end up owing then there is still no harm/no foul as far as my understanding of this goes. The only caveat to all of this is with each withholding allowance that you claim you should have a good reason or explanation for that withholding allowance for when/if you are audited.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
I have a good explanation: I payed $36,000 in mortgage interest this year.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:On the W4 you are not claiming dependents you are claiming the number of withholding allowances you want to take (head of household, dependent, etc...) and if you are trying to lower the amount taken out of your check as you are always giving the money to the government to hold for you for the year then what is unethical about it if he is over paying anyway? He probably has a 401k and several other vehicles (rising property taxes, stock market losses, etc...) that allows him to take more withholding allowances and so forth. If you are in contact with your accountant and have a good estimate of how your taxes are going to work out at year end then taking more allowances would be a good strategy. Also if you pay your taxes at the end of the year even if you end up owing then there is still no harm/no foul as far as my understanding of this goes. The only caveat to all of this is with each withholding allowance that you claim you should have a good reason or explanation for that withholding allowance for when/if you are audited.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 12387
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Holy Shit!AZGrizFan wrote:I have a good explanation: I payed $36,000 in mortgage interest this year.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:On the W4 you are not claiming dependents you are claiming the number of withholding allowances you want to take (head of household, dependent, etc...) and if you are trying to lower the amount taken out of your check as you are always giving the money to the government to hold for you for the year then what is unethical about it if he is over paying anyway? He probably has a 401k and several other vehicles (rising property taxes, stock market losses, etc...) that allows him to take more withholding allowances and so forth. If you are in contact with your accountant and have a good estimate of how your taxes are going to work out at year end then taking more allowances would be a good strategy. Also if you pay your taxes at the end of the year even if you end up owing then there is still no harm/no foul as far as my understanding of this goes. The only caveat to all of this is with each withholding allowance that you claim you should have a good reason or explanation for that withholding allowance for when/if you are audited.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
That would definitely qualify as a good explanation. Since each withholding allowance accounts for $3400 then that one alone puts you up at 10 before anything else.AZGrizFan wrote:I have a good explanation: I payed $36,000 in mortgage interest this year.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:On the W4 you are not claiming dependents you are claiming the number of withholding allowances you want to take (head of household, dependent, etc...) and if you are trying to lower the amount taken out of your check as you are always giving the money to the government to hold for you for the year then what is unethical about it if he is over paying anyway? He probably has a 401k and several other vehicles (rising property taxes, stock market losses, etc...) that allows him to take more withholding allowances and so forth. If you are in contact with your accountant and have a good estimate of how your taxes are going to work out at year end then taking more allowances would be a good strategy. Also if you pay your taxes at the end of the year even if you end up owing then there is still no harm/no foul as far as my understanding of this goes. The only caveat to all of this is with each withholding allowance that you claim you should have a good reason or explanation for that withholding allowance for when/if you are audited.
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
That would definitely qualify as a good explanation. Since each withholding allowance accounts for $3400 then that one alone puts you up at 10 before anything else.AZGrizFan wrote:I have a good explanation: I payed $36,000 in mortgage interest this year.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:On the W4 you are not claiming dependents you are claiming the number of withholding allowances you want to take (head of household, dependent, etc...) and if you are trying to lower the amount taken out of your check as you are always giving the money to the government to hold for you for the year then what is unethical about it if he is over paying anyway? He probably has a 401k and several other vehicles (rising property taxes, stock market losses, etc...) that allows him to take more withholding allowances and so forth. If you are in contact with your accountant and have a good estimate of how your taxes are going to work out at year end then taking more allowances would be a good strategy. Also if you pay your taxes at the end of the year even if you end up owing then there is still no harm/no foul as far as my understanding of this goes. The only caveat to all of this is with each withholding allowance that you claim you should have a good reason or explanation for that withholding allowance for when/if you are audited.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
You're tellin' me....and my wife wonders why we never have any money.HI54UNI wrote:Holy Shit!AZGrizFan wrote: I have a good explanation: I payed $36,000 in mortgage interest this year.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 12387
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
AZGrizFan wrote:You're tellin' me....and my wife wonders why we never have any money.HI54UNI wrote: Holy Shit!
The more you make the more you spend. Just be thankful you're screwing the government by not paying any taxes!
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Oh, I PAY taxes. I just pay IN more than I should, so I end up getting some of it back every year.HI54UNI wrote:AZGrizFan wrote: You're tellin' me....and my wife wonders why we never have any money.
The more you make the more you spend. Just be thankful you're screwing the government by not paying any taxes!
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
It is always interesting to me that there are some ham & egger's that don't really understand the amount of taxes that are paid in by those in the higher tax brackets. I know a feller that was making 16,000/month from a company that he built himself from the ground up. His take home pay after taxes each month was about 1/2 of that. In my eyes people that are forced to pay these kind of astronomical amounts of their income to the government to cover the asses of those of us in the lower tax brackets should be recognized for their efforts due to the fact that they are using no more of the resources that these taxes provide, and in most cases using much less of the resources than those in the lower tax brackets. Many people talk about the rich paying more of their fair share when in reality the masses of us are living a better life with more comfort than we would enjoy if we were only receiving the benefits of what we had contributed to the country's financial well being. Those of us that are in the bottom 50% of wage earners ought to be kissing the asses of those that are in the top 50% of wage earners. The top 50% pays 96% of the taxes in this country while the bottom 50% picks up the tab for the remaining 4%. I wonder why the rich guys are always bitching about the amount of taxes that they have to pay?
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
You're welcome.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:It is always interesting to me that there are some ham & egger's that don't really understand the amount of taxes that are paid in by those in the higher tax brackets. I know a feller that was making 16,000/month from a company that he built himself from the ground up. His take home pay after taxes each month was about 1/2 of that. In my eyes people that are forced to pay these kind of astronomical amounts of their income to the government to cover the asses of those of us in the lower tax brackets should be recognized for their efforts due to the fact that they are using no more of the resources that these taxes provide, and in most cases using much less of the resources than those in the lower tax brackets. Many people talk about the rich paying more of their fair share when in reality the masses of us are living a better life with more comfort than we would enjoy if we were only receiving the benefits of what we had contributed to the country's financial well being. Those of us that are in the bottom 50% of wage earners ought to be kissing the asses of those that are in the top 50% of wage earners. The top 50% pays 96% of the taxes in this country while the bottom 50% picks up the tab for the remaining 4%. I wonder why the rich guys are always bitching about the amount of taxes that they have to pay?
I have $50,000 a year come out of my pay for various taxes....Fed, State, Soc Sec, Medicare.....and that's AFTER I've contributed to my 401k. Over half of that (Soc & Medicare) I won't see for years. And the bulk of the rest I get back a small refund on....we need better stewards of our money....
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Maroon Supporter
- Posts: 21613
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
- A.K.A.: Bill Brasky
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Exactly my point. You are paying more into the general fund of America's well being than most that question your strategy for trying to keep some of the money that is pilfered from you. You should probably be ridiculed for doing so.
- Col Hogan
- Supporter
- Posts: 12230
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
- I am a fan of: William & Mary
- Location: Republic of Texas
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
I really don't care what the tax rate is...I care that my tax dollars are used wisely...
That's where I'm angry...I know there is waste galore...and in some cases outright fraud...
I'll continue to gladly pay my taxes, I just want more controls...yet I see those controls being reduced, not increased...
And the reason for that is simple...tighter controls = more efficient use of tax dollars...More efficient use of tax dollars = lower costs for more services...lower costs for more services = less need for taxes (a cut in tax rates)...
Without the improved efficiency, the only things bureaucrats know is asking for more money...
That's where I'm angry...I know there is waste galore...and in some cases outright fraud...
I'll continue to gladly pay my taxes, I just want more controls...yet I see those controls being reduced, not increased...
And the reason for that is simple...tighter controls = more efficient use of tax dollars...More efficient use of tax dollars = lower costs for more services...lower costs for more services = less need for taxes (a cut in tax rates)...
Without the improved efficiency, the only things bureaucrats know is asking for more money...
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45610
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
BINGO!!! We have a winner!Col Hogan wrote:I really don't care what the tax rate is...I care that my tax dollars are used wisely...
That's where I'm angry...I know there is waste galore...and in some cases outright fraud...
I'll continue to gladly pay my taxes, I just want more controls...yet I see those controls being reduced, not increased...
And the reason for that is simple...tighter controls = more efficient use of tax dollars...More efficient use of tax dollars = lower costs for more services...lower costs for more services = less need for taxes (a cut in tax rates)...
Without the improved efficiency, the only things bureaucrats know is asking for more money...
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
Following your logic, then you DO care what your tax rate is....Col Hogan wrote:I really don't care what the tax rate is...I care that my tax dollars are used wisely...
That's where I'm angry...I know there is waste galore...and in some cases outright fraud...
I'll continue to gladly pay my taxes, I just want more controls...yet I see those controls being reduced, not increased...
And the reason for that is simple...tighter controls = more efficient use of tax dollars...More efficient use of tax dollars = lower costs for more services...lower costs for more services = less need for taxes (a cut in tax rates)...
Without the improved efficiency, the only things bureaucrats know is asking for more money...
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- Col Hogan
- Supporter
- Posts: 12230
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
- I am a fan of: William & Mary
- Location: Republic of Texas
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
You're kinda correct...AZGrizFan wrote:Following your logic, then you DO care what your tax rate is....Col Hogan wrote:I really don't care what the tax rate is...I care that my tax dollars are used wisely...
That's where I'm angry...I know there is waste galore...and in some cases outright fraud...
I'll continue to gladly pay my taxes, I just want more controls...yet I see those controls being reduced, not increased...
And the reason for that is simple...tighter controls = more efficient use of tax dollars...More efficient use of tax dollars = lower costs for more services...lower costs for more services = less need for taxes (a cut in tax rates)...
Without the improved efficiency, the only things bureaucrats know is asking for more money...
I'd agree to pay more for a short period of time to get our rampant waste under control (you have to spend money to make money)...if...IF...there was some plan with assurances of reduced taxes in the end...
Now, I know bureacrats don't know how to reduce budgets and gain efficiencies...that's why we would have to pay to bring in experts to get this mess under control...
Government unions and special interest lobbiests would fight tooth and nail against it...
But, I'm feeling optimistic today...IT CAN BE DONE...
Question is, will either of our political parties and our future president have the stomach for it......I doubt it..... (pessimism sets in.......)
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet
- Posts: 20306
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Tax Rates Under Clinton & Bush
I'd say that's justification enough. Egad!AZGrizFan wrote:I have a good explanation: I payed $36,000 in mortgage interest this year.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:On the W4 you are not claiming dependents you are claiming the number of withholding allowances you want to take (head of household, dependent, etc...) and if you are trying to lower the amount taken out of your check as you are always giving the money to the government to hold for you for the year then what is unethical about it if he is over paying anyway? He probably has a 401k and several other vehicles (rising property taxes, stock market losses, etc...) that allows him to take more withholding allowances and so forth. If you are in contact with your accountant and have a good estimate of how your taxes are going to work out at year end then taking more allowances would be a good strategy. Also if you pay your taxes at the end of the year even if you end up owing then there is still no harm/no foul as far as my understanding of this goes. The only caveat to all of this is with each withholding allowance that you claim you should have a good reason or explanation for that withholding allowance for when/if you are audited.
SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.