Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

coastal89 · Post by **coastal89** » Mon Feb 18, 2008 12:45 pm

I've been saying this for years.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=56494

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:44 am

You know...anything can probably be called a mental disorder. Why stoke the fire?

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:49 am

[quote="MarkCCU"]You know...anything can probably be called a mental disorder. Why stoke the fire?[/quote]

I've heard that exhibiting any desire to attend CCU has been classified as downright retarded.

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:57 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
MarkCCU wrote:You know...anything can probably be called a mental disorder. Why stoke the fire?[/quote]

I've heard that exhibiting any desire to attend CCU has been classified as downright retarded.

[/quote]

That god, I didn't desire to go to Coastal. lol

Post by **dbackjon** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:11 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
MarkCCU wrote:You know...anything can probably be called a mental disorder. Why stoke the fire?[/quote]

I've heard that exhibiting any desire to attend CCU has been classified as downright retarded.

[/quote]

Not to mention coming to Arizona for work and not contacting us...

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:26 am

dbackjon wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:

Not to mention coming to Arizona for work and not contacting us...[/quote]

He did WHAT???

Post by **dbackjon** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:56 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
Not to mention coming to Arizona for work and not contacting us...

He did WHAT???[/quote]

yup - was in Sierra Vista. Claims he was "too busy"...

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:24 am

I was in Sierra Vista for 1 1.2 days. Any of you close by?

Post by **dbackjon** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:35 am

MarkCCU wrote:I was in Sierra Vista for 1 1.2 days. Any of you close by?

about 2 1/2 hours away (close, in Arizona!)

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:39 am

2 1/2 hours is close for you?! How close are you to Phoenix?

Post by **dbackjon** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:44 am

MarkCCU wrote:2 1/2 hours is close for you?! How close are you to Phoenix?

in a Phoenix suburb - about 20 minutes (or 40 minutes if I was stupid enough to drive during rush hour) to downtown Phoenix.

I can be in Tucson in an hour and a half from my house.

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:46 am

i may be back in Az. I'm not sure, it depends on a few people and if they continue to screw up.

Post by **dbackjon** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:52 am

MarkCCU wrote:i may be back in Az. I'm not sure, it depends on a few people and if they continue to screw up.

let us know!!

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:43 pm

I will definetly let you all know.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 12:13 am

Ibanez wrote:I will definetly let you all know.

*definitely

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 3:18 am

Gotta like an 11 year bump

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Post by **andy7171** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 4:40 am

Is this thread to the prequel to Raul getting pissed off he wasn't dbacks type?

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 4:50 am

andy7171 wrote:Is this thread to the prequel to Raul getting pissed off he wasn't dbacks type?

I was never upset over that. It was jokes...

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 4:50 am

If its not it should be

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:21 am

CID1990 wrote:
Ibanez wrote:I will definetly let you all know.
*definitely

EPIC fucking bump, CID. Just EPIC.

Post by **Ivytalk** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:53 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
*definitely
EPIC **** bump, CID. Just EPIC.

I guess CID doesn’t have much to do in Thailand but drink local beer and read old threads.

Chizzang · Post by **Chizzang** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:54 am

necro posting

Post by **kalm** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 8:28 am

1) This country was founded on liberalism.

2) Worldnetdaily....

(necro response)

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:27 am

Ivytalk wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
EPIC **** bump, CID. Just EPIC.
I guess CID doesn’t have much to do in Thailand but drink local beer and read old threads.

Well I checked the board at your usual wakey wakey time and you hadn’t posted.... so I started surfing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JohnStOnge · Post by **JohnStOnge** » Thu Mar 28, 2019 4:31 pm

Something tells me his opinion is not going to be embraced by the field of psychiatry. I am guessing we are not going to see "Liberalism" indicated as a disorder in the American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

The irony of this to me is, to me, that I think the realm in which he operates is generally liberal. I would be very willing to bet that an overwhelming majority of psychiatrists are liberal.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder

Re: Top psychiatrist concludes liberalism is mental disorder