Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

I laughed when I saw that..............let the guy move his crap to Washington first.....my god

danefan wrote:I laughed when I saw that..............let the guy move his crap to Washington first.....my god

reminiscent of Obama... The presidential talk was around him even before his senate election in 2004.

But I agree. They should let him atleast pack his pickup.

Also shows just how lean the field is for Republican presidential candidates

By the time his term comes up for re-election (2012) he will be more experienced in governance than Obama was when he ran for President. That's just an observation of fact, not any kind of endorsement, since I don't think he will yet have the experience to be President. I would much prefer to see the other Massachusetts politician not named John Kerry get the nod.

I don't know enough about the guy to make any predictions about how I would vote if he was on a national ticket yet. Some of his past behaviors in the Mass. state Senate make me think he is something of a centrist. His tone has certainly been one of openness to bipartisanship. He stayed on that message even when Coakley and Obama were throwing some pretty unfair darts. (I won't even get into moonbat Olbermann).

I'd agree that we need to at least let him get to Washington and do his job first.

CID1990 wrote:By the time his term comes up for re-election (2012) he will be more experienced in governance than Obama was when he ran for President. That's just an observation of fact, not any kind of endorsement, since I don't think he will yet have the experience to be President. I would much prefer to see the other Massachusetts politician not named John Kerry get the nod.

I don't know enough about the guy to make any predictions about how I would vote if he was on a national ticket yet. Some of his past behaviors in the Mass. state Senate make me think he is something of a centrist. His tone has certainly been one of openness to bipartisanship. He stayed on that message even when Coakley and Obama were throwing some pretty unfair darts. (I won't even get into moonbat Olbermann).

I'd agree that we need to at least let him get to Washington and do his job first.

Barney?

UNHWildCats wrote:

CID1990 wrote:By the time his term comes up for re-election (2012) he will be more experienced in governance than Obama was when he ran for President. That's just an observation of fact, not any kind of endorsement, since I don't think he will yet have the experience to be President. I would much prefer to see the other Massachusetts politician not named John Kerry get the nod.

I don't know enough about the guy to make any predictions about how I would vote if he was on a national ticket yet. Some of his past behaviors in the Mass. state Senate make me think he is something of a centrist. His tone has certainly been one of openness to bipartisanship. He stayed on that message even when Coakley and Obama were throwing some pretty unfair darts. (I won't even get into moonbat Olbermann).

I'd agree that we need to at least let him get to Washington and do his job first.

Barney?

Hah! You know that's not who I meant.

I don't know about President but he might be the ideal choice to deliver the opposition statement after the State of the Union next week, due to the fact that he's in he public eye more than any GOP'er right now and he has carried a populist message to his win yesterday.

blueballs wrote:I don't know about President but he might be the ideal choice to deliver the opposition statement after the State of the Union next week, due to the fact that he's in he public eye more than any GOP'er right now and he has carried a populist message to his win yesterday.

I wish we had the equivalent of the British parliament's "question time," rather than an opposition statement that sets out partisan points without direct interaction. Let someone cross-examine that brilliant attorney and former Harvard Law Review president on the Congressional floor about the substance of his policies, and see how Barry reacts.

Ivytalk wrote:

blueballs wrote:I don't know about President but he might be the ideal choice to deliver the opposition statement after the State of the Union next week, due to the fact that he's in he public eye more than any GOP'er right now and he has carried a populist message to his win yesterday.

I wish we had the equivalent of the British parliament's "question time," rather than an opposition statement that sets out partisan points without direct interaction. Let someone cross-examine that brilliant attorney and former Harvard Law Review president on the Congressional floor about the substance of his policies, and see how Barry reacts.

if we had that Bush might have declined Congresses invitation each year but I agree, you want to be the most powerful man in the world, you should face the heat every once in awhile.

blueballs wrote:I don't know about President but he might be the ideal choice to deliver the opposition statement after the State of the Union next week, due to the fact that he's in he public eye more than any GOP'er right now and he has carried a populist message to his win yesterday.

He should be on a shortlist of potential speakers for the GOP next week

OL FU wrote:Also shows just how lean the field is for Republican presidential candidates

This.

If the Republican Party had any sense at all the rebuttal speech would be given by Mitt Romney.

saw that Brown2012 and BrownforPresident etc... were already registered domains.

dgreco wrote:saw that Brown2012 and BrownforPresident etc... were already registered domains.

Citdog would freak.

We'd be going from a half black to a Brown President.

Ivytalk wrote:

blueballs wrote:I don't know about President but he might be the ideal choice to deliver the opposition statement after the State of the Union next week, due to the fact that he's in he public eye more than any GOP'er right now and he has carried a populist message to his win yesterday.

I wish we had the equivalent of the British parliament's "question time," rather than an opposition statement that sets out partisan points without direct interaction. Let someone cross-examine that brilliant attorney and former Harvard Law Review president on the Congressional floor about the substance of his policies, and see how Barry reacts.

He won Ted Kennedy's seat from the Democrats, I'd say he had a shot. Brown vs Palin would be just as epic as Hilary vs Obama. Two very different candidates who are about as far as two people could be in the same party.