-Scott Brown
Quoted in a superb op-ed piece by Peggy Noonan in the Wall Street Journal
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... LEFTSecond



Nuts and Creeps. I love it!If you were a normal human sitting at home having a beer and watching national politics peripherally, as normal people do until they focus on an election, chances are pretty good you came to see the two major parties not as the Dems versus the Reps, or the blue versus the red, but as the Nuts versus the Creeps. The Nuts were for high spending and taxing and the expansion of government no matter what. The Creeps were hypocrites who talked one thing and did another, who went along on the spending spree while lecturing on fiscal solvency.



You sure you posted this in the right forum? Where, in this article, is this issue addressed?Grizalltheway wrote:We've already seen the kind of damage "free", under-regulated financial markets can do to the economy. Socialism isn't the answer, but neither is free-for-all corporatism.


Are you referring to the "free-for-all-corporatism" imposed in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by socialists like Barney Frank and acceded to by liberal Republicans like the Bushes?Grizalltheway wrote:We've already seen the kind of damage "free", under-regulated financial markets can do to the economy. Socialism isn't the answer, but neither is free-for-all corporatism.

Did you read the quote from Brown?AZGrizFan wrote:You sure you posted this in the right forum? Where, in this article, is this issue addressed?Grizalltheway wrote:We've already seen the kind of damage "free", under-regulated financial markets can do to the economy. Socialism isn't the answer, but neither is free-for-all corporatism.

native wrote:Are you referring to the "free-for-all-corporatism" imposed in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by socialists like Barney Frank and acceded to by liberal Republicans like the Bushes?Grizalltheway wrote:We've already seen the kind of damage "free", under-regulated financial markets can do to the economy. Socialism isn't the answer, but neither is free-for-all corporatism.
Absurd.

I'm talking about the notion that businesses (especially corporations) ALWAYS do what's best for the economy, and the government ALWAYS fucks it up. A careful balance between the two is needed.native wrote:Are you referring to the "free-for-all-corporatism" imposed in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by socialists like Barney Frank and acceded to by liberal Republicans like the Bushes?Grizalltheway wrote:We've already seen the kind of damage "free", under-regulated financial markets can do to the economy. Socialism isn't the answer, but neither is free-for-all corporatism.
Absurd.

The markets were not truly "free." Government propping up banks by letting them print money, then turning a blind eye to clear corruption, as long as they played by government's rules is not ideal either. There were many components to what caused the economic collapse, supposed "free" markets was one of them. But, so was Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and CRA. Keep in mind, if the markets were truly "free," we wouldn't need free trade agreements.Grizalltheway wrote:We've already seen the kind of damage "free", under-regulated financial markets can do to the economy. Socialism isn't the answer, but neither is free-for-all corporatism.

Grizalltheway wrote:Did you read the quote from Brown?AZGrizFan wrote:
You sure you posted this in the right forum? Where, in this article, is this issue addressed?


They aren't. It's just that you, and other conkholes, have some trouble with the definition of socialism:AZGrizFan wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
Did you read the quote from Brown?![]()
Sorry. I stopped reading at "not bailouts".
![]()
Question: If socialism isn't the answer, why are Congress and the President pushing us so hard in that direction?![]()
Socialism refers to the various theories of economic organization advocating public or direct worker ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with a method of compensation based on the amount of labor expended

I am not a lover of corporate power, but government screws up far more than corporations. At least corporate screw ups are eventually self-correcting.Grizalltheway wrote:I'm talking about the notion that businesses (especially corporations) ALWAYS do what's best for the economy, and the government ALWAYS **** it up. A careful balance between the two is needed.native wrote:
Are you referring to the "free-for-all-corporatism" imposed in the form of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by socialists like Barney Frank and acceded to by liberal Republicans like the Bushes?
Absurd.


There are plenty of places in America where neighbors care about each other!mainejeff wrote:Corporations had a conscience.
Government had a backbone.
Americans cared about their neighbors.
Sadly, none of those exist anymore.
Tell that to General Motors and Chrysler.Grizalltheway wrote:
They aren't. It's just that you, and other conkholes, have some trouble with the definition of socialism:
Socialism refers to the various theories of economic organization advocating public or direct worker ownership and administration of the means of production and allocation of resources, and a society characterized by equal access to resources for all individuals with a method of compensation based on the amount of labor expended

MT is one of them.native wrote:There are plenty of places in America where neighbors care about each other!mainejeff wrote:Corporations had a conscience.
Government had a backbone.
Americans cared about their neighbors.
Sadly, none of those exist anymore.

In gated religious compounds???........native wrote:There are plenty of places in America where neighbors care about each other!mainejeff wrote:Corporations had a conscience.
Government had a backbone.
Americans cared about their neighbors.
Sadly, none of those exist anymore.

We give ourselves too much credit.Grizalltheway wrote:MT is one of them.native wrote:
There are plenty of places in America where neighbors care about each other!But I think he's right about the other two.

mainejeff wrote:In gated religious compounds???........native wrote:
There are plenty of places in America where neighbors care about each other!

That was all warm and fuzzy! We all know that stuff like this happens everyday......as well as bad stories to match every good one. Still doesn't change my view on what has happened to Americans and what made America "great" at one time............native wrote:mainejeff wrote:
In gated religious compounds???........
![]()
![]()
Probably in those places, too.
Let me tell you about my neighborhood in San Diego. On New Year's eve, I was at a local strip mall when I passed an elderly man grasping a walker and standing near a handicapped parking place with a worried look on his face. A middle aged fellow with a young son had joined the old man. I asked them if something was wrong, if they needed any help. It turns out they were standing guard over a wallet someone had dropped near that parking place. They said they had seen a lady with a purple blouse walking away from that parking place. Perhaps it was her wallet? I remembered walking past a lady in a purple blouse, so I picked up the wallet and rushed into the store and found the lady in the purple blouse, but she said the wallet was not hers. She also mentioned that she had seen a lady with a car full of party balloons leaving that parking place as she was driving up. So I gave the wallet to the store manager. Going back to the parking pace, I saw a car full of party balloons double parked near the place where we originally found the wallet and stood there looking around for its owner. Pretty soon, a lady with tears in hers eyes, who resembled the picture in the driver's license inside the wallet, walked up to me and asked, "was it you?" I told her about the old man and chasing he lady with the purple blouse, and gave her a big old hug as she said "thank you."
Five strangers each did the right thing that day. As a result, the lady who lost her wallet found it. Each of the five strangers had the opportunity to steal the wallet, but each did the right thing.
Don't tell me no one cares.

The Mennonites where I grew up still build homes and barns for each other, and donate lots of time and money for those less fortunate.mainejeff wrote:That was all warm and fuzzy! We all know that stuff like this happens everyday......as well as bad stories to match every good one. Still doesn't change my view on what has happened to Americans and what made America "great" at one time............native wrote:
![]()
![]()
Probably in those places, too.
Let me tell you about my neighborhood in San Diego. On New Year's eve, I was at a local strip mall when I passed an elderly man grasping a walker and standing near a handicapped parking place with a worried look on his face. A middle aged fellow with a young son had joined the old man. I asked them if something was wrong, if they needed any help. It turns out they were standing guard over a wallet someone had dropped near that parking place. They said they had seen a lady with a purple blouse walking away from that parking place. Perhaps it was her wallet? I remembered walking past a lady in a purple blouse, so I picked up the wallet and rushed into the store and found the lady in the purple blouse, but she said the wallet was not hers. She also mentioned that she had seen a lady with a car full of party balloons leaving that parking place as she was driving up. So I gave the wallet to the store manager. Going back to the parking pace, I saw a car full of party balloons double parked near the place where we originally found the wallet and stood there looking around for its owner. Pretty soon, a lady with tears in hers eyes, who resembled the picture in the driver's license inside the wallet, walked up to me and asked, "was it you?" I told her about the old man and chasing he lady with the purple blouse, and gave her a big old hug as she said "thank you."
Five strangers each did the right thing that day. As a result, the lady who lost her wallet found it. Each of the five strangers had the opportunity to steal the wallet, but each did the right thing.
Don't tell me no one cares.

Maybe you should try living in a red state.mainejeff wrote:That was all warm and fuzzy! We all know that stuff like this happens everyday......as well as bad stories to match every good one. Still doesn't change my view on what has happened to Americans and what made America "great" at one time............native wrote:
![]()
![]()
Probably in those places, too.
Let me tell you about my neighborhood in San Diego. On New Year's eve, I was at a local strip mall when I passed an elderly man grasping a walker and standing near a handicapped parking place with a worried look on his face. A middle aged fellow with a young son had joined the old man. I asked them if something was wrong, if they needed any help. It turns out they were standing guard over a wallet someone had dropped near that parking place. They said they had seen a lady with a purple blouse walking away from that parking place. Perhaps it was her wallet? I remembered walking past a lady in a purple blouse, so I picked up the wallet and rushed into the store and found the lady in the purple blouse, but she said the wallet was not hers. She also mentioned that she had seen a lady with a car full of party balloons leaving that parking place as she was driving up. So I gave the wallet to the store manager. Going back to the parking pace, I saw a car full of party balloons double parked near the place where we originally found the wallet and stood there looking around for its owner. Pretty soon, a lady with tears in hers eyes, who resembled the picture in the driver's license inside the wallet, walked up to me and asked, "was it you?" I told her about the old man and chasing he lady with the purple blouse, and gave her a big old hug as she said "thank you."
Five strangers each did the right thing that day. As a result, the lady who lost her wallet found it. Each of the five strangers had the opportunity to steal the wallet, but each did the right thing.
Don't tell me no one cares.

Unless you live next door to manegeffnative wrote:There are plenty of places in America where neighbors care about each other!mainejeff wrote:Corporations had a conscience.
Government had a backbone.
Americans cared about their neighbors.
Sadly, none of those exist anymore.
