Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Award five-year demonstration grants to
states to develop, implement, and evaluate
alternatives to current tort litigations.
Preference will be given to states that have
developed alternatives in consultation with
relevant stakeholders and that have proposals
that are likely to enhance patient safety by
reducing medical errors and adverse events
and are likely to improve access to liability
insurance.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yes. But, left up to states:

Award five-year demonstration grants to
states to develop, implement, and evaluate
alternatives to current tort litigations.
Preference will be given to states that have
developed alternatives in consultation with
relevant stakeholders and that have proposals
that are likely to enhance patient safety by
reducing medical errors and adverse events
and are likely to improve access to liability
insurance.

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/ ... _final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

native wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yes. But, left up to states:



http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/ ... _final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That thar is not even good spin. It's just pure Grade A bullshit.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yes. But, left up to states:

Award five-year demonstration grants to
states to develop, implement, and evaluate
alternatives to current tort litigations.
Preference will be given to states that have
developed alternatives in consultation with
relevant stakeholders and that have proposals
that are likely to enhance patient safety by
reducing medical errors and adverse events
and are likely to improve access to liability
insurance.

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/ ... _final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

D1B wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yes. But, left up to states:



http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/ ... _final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Jelly, I'll preface my opinion by admitting to currently being high as a motherfucking kite, but the above does sound like a load of shit - a vague and open ended plan. Fuck I need to go to bed.

native wrote:

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yes. But, left up to states:



http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/ ... _final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

That thar is not even good spin. It's just pure Grade A bullshit.

OSBF wrote:In the interest of keeping the Govt the fuck out of my personal life, I don't want them to mandate what my arm, leg, eye, or life is worth.

Chizzang wrote:

OSBF wrote:In the interest of keeping the Govt the fuck out of my personal life, I don't want them to mandate what my arm, leg, eye, or life is worth.

what's your stand on abortion..?

OSBF wrote:In the interest of keeping the Govt the fuck out of my personal life, I don't want them to mandate what my arm, leg, eye, or life is worth.

D1B wrote:malpractice relief, tort reform or whatever the fuck you call it. I certainly wish the democratic part would wisen up on certain issues, primarily the proper role of government, but I'm truly and utterly embarrassed that the party I voted for would not put this at the top of the fucking list for welfare reform.

Fuck, I'm stoned, but that is some horrifyingly scary shit.

Skjellyfetti wrote:Yes. But, left up to states:

Award five-year demonstration grants to
states to develop, implement, and evaluate
alternatives to current tort litigations.
Preference will be given to states that have
developed alternatives in consultation with
relevant stakeholders and that have proposals
that are likely to enhance patient safety by
reducing medical errors and adverse events
and are likely to improve access to liability
insurance.

http://www.kff.org/healthreform/upload/ ... _final.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;